Conceptualizing the multispecies triad: Toward a multispecies intersectionality

Andrea Petitt
{"title":"Conceptualizing the multispecies triad: Toward a multispecies intersectionality","authors":"Andrea Petitt","doi":"10.1002/fea2.12099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Feminist and multispecies anthropologies have decentered those most visible to appreciate the perspectives of those othered in society—but also to better understand society at large. This article goes beyond decentering the human toward decentering another analytical focus: the species dyad. Building on previous work on gender–species intersectionality and multispecies ethnography, as well as drawing on a set of five ethnographic and multispecies fieldwork studies involving gendered relations between humans, cattle, and horses on three continents, this article offers a conceptualization of the <i>multispecies triad</i> by outlining a <i>multispecies intersectionality</i> theory. This entails acknowledging the intersectionality of five sets of relations: (1) species as a power relation beyond biology; (2) intersecting power relations of humans (such as gender and ethnicity as well as local categories); (3) humans’ organization of nonhumans into intraspecies categories (by for example sex, breed, age as well as local categories); (4) nonhumans’ own intraspecies power relations; and (5) nonhumans’ relations to intraspecies groups of other species (including human subgroups). By situating a multispecies triad in this multispecies intersectionality, the article shows how relations of power intersect within and across species with consequences for individuals and groups of all species involved. Multispecies intersectionality can thus be of interest even to scholars primarily interested in humans.</p>","PeriodicalId":73022,"journal":{"name":"Feminist anthropology","volume":"4 1","pages":"23-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fea2.12099","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fea2.12099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Feminist and multispecies anthropologies have decentered those most visible to appreciate the perspectives of those othered in society—but also to better understand society at large. This article goes beyond decentering the human toward decentering another analytical focus: the species dyad. Building on previous work on gender–species intersectionality and multispecies ethnography, as well as drawing on a set of five ethnographic and multispecies fieldwork studies involving gendered relations between humans, cattle, and horses on three continents, this article offers a conceptualization of the multispecies triad by outlining a multispecies intersectionality theory. This entails acknowledging the intersectionality of five sets of relations: (1) species as a power relation beyond biology; (2) intersecting power relations of humans (such as gender and ethnicity as well as local categories); (3) humans’ organization of nonhumans into intraspecies categories (by for example sex, breed, age as well as local categories); (4) nonhumans’ own intraspecies power relations; and (5) nonhumans’ relations to intraspecies groups of other species (including human subgroups). By situating a multispecies triad in this multispecies intersectionality, the article shows how relations of power intersect within and across species with consequences for individuals and groups of all species involved. Multispecies intersectionality can thus be of interest even to scholars primarily interested in humans.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
概念化多物种三位一体:走向多物种交叉性
女权主义和多物种人类学让那些最显眼的人去欣赏社会中其他人的观点,同时也更好地理解整个社会。这篇文章超越了对人类的去中心化,转向了对另一个分析焦点的去中心化:物种二分体。基于先前关于性别-物种交叉性和多物种人种学的工作,以及在三大洲进行的涉及人类、牛和马之间性别关系的五项人种学和多物种实地研究,本文通过概述多物种交叉性理论,提出了多物种三位一体的概念化。这需要承认五组关系的交叉性:(1)物种作为一种超越生物学的权力关系;(2)人类的交叉权力关系(如性别和种族以及地方类别);(3)人类将非人类组织为种内类别(例如性别、品种、年龄以及当地类别);(4)非人类自身的种内权力关系;(5)非人类与其他物种(包括人类亚群)种内群体的关系。通过将多物种三位一体置于这种多物种交叉性中,文章展示了权力关系如何在物种内部和物种之间交叉,并对所有物种的个人和群体产生影响。因此,即使是主要对人类感兴趣的学者,也会对多物种的交叉性感兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Finding Wang Tonghui: The life and after‐life of a pioneer female Chinese anthropologist Gender violence, emotion, and the state symposium commentary The politics of emotion and domestic violence in northern Vietnam Introduction to the gender violence, emotion, and the state symposium
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1