Acceptance of Influenza Vaccination among Pregnant Women attending the Antenatal Care Clinic, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital

Teeranuch Leewongtrakul, Y. Kunpalin, T. Ingviya, S. Chaithongwongwatthana
{"title":"Acceptance of Influenza Vaccination among Pregnant Women attending the Antenatal Care Clinic, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital","authors":"Teeranuch Leewongtrakul, Y. Kunpalin, T. Ingviya, S. Chaithongwongwatthana","doi":"10.14456/TJOG.2017.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To determine the acceptance rate and associated factors of influenza vaccination among Thai pregnant women. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital from November 2014 to March 2015. Pregnant women were asked to complete self-administered questionnaires that collected data on acceptance of vaccination, knowledge, attitude and practice regarding to influenza vaccination during pregnancy. The associated factors were determined by logistic regression analysis. Results: A total of 412 women completed the questionnaires. Acceptance rate of influenza vaccination among the participants was 40.5% (95% CI 35.9-45.3). Most participants (320 women, 77.7%) had good knowledge about influenza and the vaccine. Factors positively associated with the acceptance were ‘advice from physicians’ (adjusted OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.55-4.39), ‘notification about vaccination in current pregnancy’ (adjusted OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.17-2.89), ‘protection of newborn’ (adjusted OR 2.83, 95% CI 1.74-4.62) and ‘cost of vaccination’ (adjusted OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.46-3.82). Negatively associated factors included ‘experience of side effects following past vaccination’ (adjusted OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.74), ‘belief that vaccination is unnecessary’ (adjusted OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.21-0.86), and ‘unsafe during the first trimester’ (adjusted OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.34-0.90). Conclusion: Acceptance rate of influenza vaccination during pregnancy among women in King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital was 40.5%. To increase vaccination rate, health care providers should advise or mention on influenza vaccination and provide information to support that the immunization can protect their newborns and is safe at any trimester.","PeriodicalId":36742,"journal":{"name":"Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"25 1","pages":"75-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14456/TJOG.2017.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the acceptance rate and associated factors of influenza vaccination among Thai pregnant women. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital from November 2014 to March 2015. Pregnant women were asked to complete self-administered questionnaires that collected data on acceptance of vaccination, knowledge, attitude and practice regarding to influenza vaccination during pregnancy. The associated factors were determined by logistic regression analysis. Results: A total of 412 women completed the questionnaires. Acceptance rate of influenza vaccination among the participants was 40.5% (95% CI 35.9-45.3). Most participants (320 women, 77.7%) had good knowledge about influenza and the vaccine. Factors positively associated with the acceptance were ‘advice from physicians’ (adjusted OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.55-4.39), ‘notification about vaccination in current pregnancy’ (adjusted OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.17-2.89), ‘protection of newborn’ (adjusted OR 2.83, 95% CI 1.74-4.62) and ‘cost of vaccination’ (adjusted OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.46-3.82). Negatively associated factors included ‘experience of side effects following past vaccination’ (adjusted OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.74), ‘belief that vaccination is unnecessary’ (adjusted OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.21-0.86), and ‘unsafe during the first trimester’ (adjusted OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.34-0.90). Conclusion: Acceptance rate of influenza vaccination during pregnancy among women in King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital was 40.5%. To increase vaccination rate, health care providers should advise or mention on influenza vaccination and provide information to support that the immunization can protect their newborns and is safe at any trimester.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在朱拉隆功国王纪念医院产前保健诊所接受流感疫苗接种的孕妇
目的:了解泰国孕妇流感疫苗接种率及相关因素。材料与方法:2014年11月至2015年3月在朱拉隆功国王纪念医院进行横断面描述性研究。孕妇被要求完成自我填写的问卷,收集关于接受疫苗接种、怀孕期间流感疫苗接种的知识、态度和做法的数据。通过logistic回归分析确定相关因素。结果:共有412名女性完成了问卷调查。流感疫苗接种率为40.5% (95% CI 35.9-45.3)。大多数参与者(320名妇女,77.7%)对流感和疫苗有良好的了解。与接受度呈正相关的因素是“医生建议”(调整后的OR为2.61,95% CI为1.55-4.39)、“妊娠期疫苗接种通知”(调整后的OR为1.84,95% CI为1.17-2.89)、“新生儿保护”(调整后的OR为2.83,95% CI为1.74-4.62)和“疫苗接种成本”(调整后的OR为2.36,95% CI为1.46-3.82)。负相关因素包括“过去接种疫苗后的副作用经历”(调整后的OR为0.19,95% CI为0.05-0.74)、“认为没有必要接种疫苗”(调整后的OR为0.42,95% CI为0.21-0.86)和“妊娠早期不安全”(调整后的OR为0.55,95% CI为0.34-0.90)。结论:朱拉隆功国王纪念医院孕妇流感疫苗接种率为40.5%。为了提高疫苗接种率,卫生保健提供者应建议或提及流感疫苗接种,并提供信息支持免疫接种可以保护新生儿,并且在任何妊娠期都是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Incidence and Risk Factors of Surgical Site Infections after Abdominal Hysterectomy for Benign Diseases Cannabis (Gan-ja): Relevant Issues in Obstetrics and Gynecology Efficacy of Music Therapy on Immediate Postpartum Episiotomy Pain: A randomized controlled trial Spot Urine Albumin to Creatinine Ratio versus Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio for the Diagnosis of Proteinuria in Pregnancy Prevalence of Hypothyroidism in Peri-/Post-Menopausal Thai Women
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1