Gentrification, Health, and Intermediate Pathways: How Distinct Inequality Mechanisms Impact Health Disparities

IF 2.8 3区 经济学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Housing Policy Debate Pub Date : 2022-09-27 DOI:10.1080/10511482.2022.2123249
H. S. Versey
{"title":"Gentrification, Health, and Intermediate Pathways: How Distinct Inequality Mechanisms Impact Health Disparities","authors":"H. S. Versey","doi":"10.1080/10511482.2022.2123249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Gentrification yields a variety of effects, yet the mechanisms linking gentrification to health are unclear. Although quantitative research has helped to identify some patterns, the processes whereby neighborhood dynamics impact health are layered and span multiple levels of health—individual, family, and community. According to research describing large-scale drivers of health, inequality (e.g., income and social) is a significant risk factor for worse health, morbidity, and mortality. Drawing from an inequality-health framework, this paper explores how inequality created by gentrification (e.g., segregated pockets of wealth alongside relative deprivation) harms health and well-being. The current study presents findings from lower-income African American women across 20 U.S. cities, and examines pathways by which gentrification increases inequality and stress for residents living in gentrifying areas. Results indicate that gentrification contributes to both direct (e.g., material scarcity) and indirect (e.g., displacement, distrust, lack of belonging) pathways that impact health, supporting mediation via four major pathways. Implications for further research, theorization, and policy are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47744,"journal":{"name":"Housing Policy Debate","volume":"33 1","pages":"6 - 29"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Housing Policy Debate","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2022.2123249","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Abstract Gentrification yields a variety of effects, yet the mechanisms linking gentrification to health are unclear. Although quantitative research has helped to identify some patterns, the processes whereby neighborhood dynamics impact health are layered and span multiple levels of health—individual, family, and community. According to research describing large-scale drivers of health, inequality (e.g., income and social) is a significant risk factor for worse health, morbidity, and mortality. Drawing from an inequality-health framework, this paper explores how inequality created by gentrification (e.g., segregated pockets of wealth alongside relative deprivation) harms health and well-being. The current study presents findings from lower-income African American women across 20 U.S. cities, and examines pathways by which gentrification increases inequality and stress for residents living in gentrifying areas. Results indicate that gentrification contributes to both direct (e.g., material scarcity) and indirect (e.g., displacement, distrust, lack of belonging) pathways that impact health, supporting mediation via four major pathways. Implications for further research, theorization, and policy are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中产阶级化、健康和中间途径:不同的不平等机制如何影响健康差异
中产阶级化产生了各种各样的影响,但将中产阶级化与健康联系起来的机制尚不清楚。虽然定量研究有助于确定一些模式,但邻里动态影响健康的过程是分层的,跨越了个人、家庭和社区的多个健康水平。根据描述健康的大规模驱动因素的研究,不平等(例如收入和社会不平等)是健康状况、发病率和死亡率恶化的一个重要风险因素。从不平等-健康的框架出发,本文探讨了士绅化(例如,财富与相对剥夺分开)造成的不平等如何损害健康和福祉。目前的研究展示了来自美国20个国家的低收入非洲裔美国妇女的调查结果城市,并研究了中产阶级化增加生活在中产阶级化地区的居民的不平等和压力的途径。结果表明,中产阶级化有助于影响健康的直接(如物质稀缺)和间接(如流离失所、不信任、缺乏归属感)途径,支持通过四个主要途径进行调解。讨论了进一步研究、理论化和政策的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
17.20%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Housing Policy Debate provides a venue for original research on U.S. housing policy. Subjects include affordable housing policy, fair housing policy, land use regulations influencing housing affordability, metropolitan development trends, and linkages among housing policy and energy, environmental, and transportation policy. Housing Policy Debate is published quarterly. Most issues feature a Forum section and an Articles section. The Forum, which highlights a current debate, features a central article and responding comments that represent a range of perspectives. All articles in the Forum and Articles sections undergo a double-blind peer review process.
期刊最新文献
Retraction: The Effect of Rent Control Status on Eviction Filing Rates: Causal Evidence from San Francisco The Effect of Rent Control Status on Eviction Filing Rates: Causal Evidence From San Francisco Game of Homes: Carrots, Sticks, and the Puzzle of Housing Vacancies “This Voicemail Box Is Full”: Landlord Perceptions of Communication Issues as a Key Challenge to Participating in the Housing Choice Voucher Program “Especially Being Homeless, They Just Think You’re Infected with COVID or Something”: A Qualitative Exploration of the COVID-19 Pandemic’s Impact on People Experiencing Homelessness With a History of Injection Drug Use in Baltimore, Maryland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1