Communicating with back burners among college students according to relationship status and love styles

IF 1.9 Q2 COMMUNICATION Communication Research Reports Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/08824096.2023.2165487
Jayson L. Dibble, Narissra Maria Punyanunt-Carter, M. Drouin
{"title":"Communicating with back burners among college students according to relationship status and love styles","authors":"Jayson L. Dibble, Narissra Maria Punyanunt-Carter, M. Drouin","doi":"10.1080/08824096.2023.2165487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Back burner relationships are prospective sexual/romantic partners that individuals communicate with for purposes of developing a sexual and/or romantic relationship. This study analyzed 762 college students with regard to sex, relationship status, love styles, and numbers of back burners. Men reported more back burners with whom they sometimes communicated in a romantic/sexual way than did women, and singles and casual daters averaged more of these back burners than did those in committed relationships. Numbers of back burners with whom participants communicated with in a strictly platonic way did not differ by sex or relationship status. Having a more ludic love style corresponded to having more total back burners, while increased storge corresponded to fewer romantic/sexual back burners. Sex and/or relationship status may matter less to the wholesale practice of maintaining back burners and more to the nature of the communication with one’s back burners.","PeriodicalId":47084,"journal":{"name":"Communication Research Reports","volume":"40 1","pages":"30 - 39"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Research Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2023.2165487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Back burner relationships are prospective sexual/romantic partners that individuals communicate with for purposes of developing a sexual and/or romantic relationship. This study analyzed 762 college students with regard to sex, relationship status, love styles, and numbers of back burners. Men reported more back burners with whom they sometimes communicated in a romantic/sexual way than did women, and singles and casual daters averaged more of these back burners than did those in committed relationships. Numbers of back burners with whom participants communicated with in a strictly platonic way did not differ by sex or relationship status. Having a more ludic love style corresponded to having more total back burners, while increased storge corresponded to fewer romantic/sexual back burners. Sex and/or relationship status may matter less to the wholesale practice of maintaining back burners and more to the nature of the communication with one’s back burners.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从恋爱状况和恋爱方式看大学生与“爱的人”的沟通
摘要次要关系是指个人为了发展性关系和/或浪漫关系而与之交往的潜在性/浪漫伴侣。这项研究分析了762名大学生的性别、关系状况、恋爱方式和“回头客”数量。男性报告称,他们有时会以浪漫/性的方式与之交流,而男性则比女性更多,单身和随意约会的人平均比那些处于承诺关系中的人更喜欢这种背后的人。参与者以严格的柏拉图式方式与之交流的“回头客”数量没有因性别或关系状况而不同。拥有一种更荒唐的爱情风格就意味着拥有更多的全面背景,而故事的增加则意味着更少的浪漫/性背景。性和/或关系状态可能对保持低调的大规模做法不那么重要,而对与低调者沟通的性质更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Extending the communication during sexual activity model: what role does sexual communication self-efficacy play? Conflict styles within individualistic, low power distance, and low context nations: a four nation comparison Science terms elicit ideological differences in message processing Development and validation of the commitment to social activism scale using the Thurstone scaling procedure Patient perceptions of healthcare provider (un)helpful approaches to explaining health information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1