"Can We Talk?"

IF 0.2 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Shofar: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Jewish Studies Pub Date : 2022-04-19 DOI:10.1353/sho.2022.0006
B. Rosenstock
{"title":"\"Can We Talk?\"","authors":"B. Rosenstock","doi":"10.1353/sho.2022.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Universities are places where many students will feel uncomfortably challenged in their cherished identities, if those are identities of privilege. On December 11, 2019, Jewish identity was singled out for special protection against harassment and discrimination under Title VI by President Trump's executive order, with anti-Jewish harassment defined as including statements such as \"the Jewish people do not have a right to self-determination\" and \"Israel is a racist endeavor.\" Singling out Jewish identity for protection by a centralized authority, regardless of what one thinks about the Jewish state, has been a favored tactic of Jewish survival, as Benzion Netanyahu long ago pointed out, and it is dangerous because it makes all Jews the target of resentment by other, lesser protected groups, and because it leaves Jews without political allies if the centralized power abandons them. Furthermore, it runs against the political principles of the pluralistic democracies in which Jews are best able to flourish when they live outside the ethnonational majoritarian Jewish state. Weaponizing Title VI by creating a special protection for Jews, whatever one's views of the Jewish state, is not a long-term strategy for Jewish communal flourishing in America. The American and Israeli Jewish communities should recognize that there are two kinds of Jewish politics: one that fits Jewish life in a pluralistic democracy, and another that fits life in a ethnonational majoritarian democracy. It is best not to mix these two forms of politics, even if in the Trump era they seemed to have become united.","PeriodicalId":21809,"journal":{"name":"Shofar: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Jewish Studies","volume":"40 1","pages":"133 - 145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shofar: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Jewish Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sho.2022.0006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Universities are places where many students will feel uncomfortably challenged in their cherished identities, if those are identities of privilege. On December 11, 2019, Jewish identity was singled out for special protection against harassment and discrimination under Title VI by President Trump's executive order, with anti-Jewish harassment defined as including statements such as "the Jewish people do not have a right to self-determination" and "Israel is a racist endeavor." Singling out Jewish identity for protection by a centralized authority, regardless of what one thinks about the Jewish state, has been a favored tactic of Jewish survival, as Benzion Netanyahu long ago pointed out, and it is dangerous because it makes all Jews the target of resentment by other, lesser protected groups, and because it leaves Jews without political allies if the centralized power abandons them. Furthermore, it runs against the political principles of the pluralistic democracies in which Jews are best able to flourish when they live outside the ethnonational majoritarian Jewish state. Weaponizing Title VI by creating a special protection for Jews, whatever one's views of the Jewish state, is not a long-term strategy for Jewish communal flourishing in America. The American and Israeli Jewish communities should recognize that there are two kinds of Jewish politics: one that fits Jewish life in a pluralistic democracy, and another that fits life in a ethnonational majoritarian democracy. It is best not to mix these two forms of politics, even if in the Trump era they seemed to have become united.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我们能谈谈吗?”
摘要:大学是一个让许多学生感到不安的地方,他们所珍视的身份受到挑战,如果这些身份是特权身份的话。2019年12月11日,美国总统特朗普发布行政命令,将犹太人身份列为美国民权法第六章中针对骚扰和歧视的特别保护对象,其中对反犹太人骚扰的定义包括“犹太人没有自决权”、“以色列是种族主义国家”等言论。就像本泽恩·内塔尼亚胡(Benzion Netanyahu)很久以前指出的那样,把犹太人的身份挑出来,让一个中央政府来保护,不管人们对这个犹太国家的看法如何,这一直是犹太人生存的一种有利策略。这种做法很危险,因为它会让所有犹太人成为其他受保护程度较低的群体怨恨的目标,还因为如果中央政府抛弃犹太人,犹太人就会失去政治盟友。此外,它违背了多元民主的政治原则,在这种原则下,犹太人生活在民族占多数的犹太国家之外,才最有可能繁荣昌盛。无论一个人对犹太国家的看法如何,通过为犹太人提供特殊保护来武器化第六章,并不是美国犹太社区繁荣的长期战略。美国和以色列的犹太社区应该认识到,有两种犹太政治:一种适合犹太人在多元化民主中的生活,另一种适合少数民族多数民主的生活。最好不要把这两种政治形式混为一谈,即使在特朗普时代,它们似乎已经团结在一起了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Ladin in Lineage: Through the Doors of Jewish Gendered Life at Yeshiva University's Stern College for Women Un-Settled Questions: Frontier Logic and Satmar Political Theology A Specter Haunting Holocaust Studies: The Muselmann Did Jews Die as Muslims in Auschwitz? Specters of the Muselmann Transmatriation? Avishag the Shunammite in Three Contemporary Israeli Novels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1