Reflecting on Practice in Christian Schools: Challenging the Epistemic Default toward Integrated Knowing

Nathan Stevens
{"title":"Reflecting on Practice in Christian Schools: Challenging the Epistemic Default toward Integrated Knowing","authors":"Nathan Stevens","doi":"10.1080/10656219.2022.2075571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The impact of western philosophy, with a particular focus on the Enlightenment, formed an epistemic default that elevated the intellectual ways of knowing at the expense of any other forms of knowing. This paper used John David Trentham’s hermeneutical approach, the Inverse Consistency Protocol, as the framework for exploring the what and the why of this epistemic default. Trentham’s first step, “envision redemptive maturity,” was used to frame the doctrinal presuppositions that undergird a call for combating the limits of the isolating and dichotomous nature of the epistemic default. The second and third steps, “read for receptivity” and “employ reflective discernment,” revealed the need for an integrated knowing that recognizes the holistic nature of the imago Dei and the impact of Jesus Christ as the truth. The work in the first three steps of Trentham’s protocol set the stage for Christian schools to make application to their particular context as they engage in Trentham’s fourth interpretive step, “identify appropriate outlets.” By using Trentham’s four steps, Christian schools may reflect on their practices and move toward an epistemology of integrated knowing that serves as the foundation for developing a culture focused on learning as formation.","PeriodicalId":38970,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on Christian Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research on Christian Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10656219.2022.2075571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The impact of western philosophy, with a particular focus on the Enlightenment, formed an epistemic default that elevated the intellectual ways of knowing at the expense of any other forms of knowing. This paper used John David Trentham’s hermeneutical approach, the Inverse Consistency Protocol, as the framework for exploring the what and the why of this epistemic default. Trentham’s first step, “envision redemptive maturity,” was used to frame the doctrinal presuppositions that undergird a call for combating the limits of the isolating and dichotomous nature of the epistemic default. The second and third steps, “read for receptivity” and “employ reflective discernment,” revealed the need for an integrated knowing that recognizes the holistic nature of the imago Dei and the impact of Jesus Christ as the truth. The work in the first three steps of Trentham’s protocol set the stage for Christian schools to make application to their particular context as they engage in Trentham’s fourth interpretive step, “identify appropriate outlets.” By using Trentham’s four steps, Christian schools may reflect on their practices and move toward an epistemology of integrated knowing that serves as the foundation for developing a culture focused on learning as formation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反思基督教学校的实践:挑战对整合认识的认知默认
西方哲学的影响,特别是对启蒙运动的影响,形成了一种认识论的默认,这种默认以牺牲任何其他形式的认识为代价,提高了知识的认识方式。本文使用了约翰·大卫·特伦瑟姆的解释学方法,即逆一致性协议,作为探索这种认知默认的内容和原因的框架。特伦瑟姆的第一步,“设想救赎的成熟”,被用来框定教义上的前提,这些前提支撑着与认知默认的孤立和二分性的局限性作斗争的呼吁。第二步和第三步,“阅读接受能力”和“运用反思辨别能力”,揭示了需要一种综合的认识,认识到上帝形象的整体本质和耶稣基督作为真理的影响。特伦特姆协议的前三个步骤为基督教学校在特伦特姆的第四个解释步骤“确定适当的出口”中应用其特定环境奠定了基础。通过使用特伦瑟姆的四个步骤,基督教学校可能会反思他们的实践,并走向一种综合知识的认识论,这种认识论是发展一种以学习作为形成的文化的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Research on Christian Education
Journal of Research on Christian Education Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The Journal of Research on Christian Education (JRCE) provides a vehicle for the scholarly interchange of research findings relative to every level of Christian education. Particular emphasis is given to Christian schooling within the Protestant tradition as well as to research findings from other traditions which have implications for such schools.
期刊最新文献
Servant Leadership and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Indonesian Christian Higher Education: Direct and Indirect Effects A Framework for the Heart-Orientation Dimension of Worldview The CASEL Framework and Christian Schools: Using a Hermeneutical Tool to Determine Worldview Alignment “That Would Be Undemocratic”: Individuality and Educational Differentiation in C. S. Lewis’s “Screwtape Proposes a Toast” (1961) Parables, Pedagogies and Purpose: A Comparison of the Use of Parables within Godly Play and Examples of UK Evangelical Children’s Ministry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1