{"title":"An analysis of bacteriuria rates after endourological procedures","authors":"Nethravathy Billava Seenappa MSc, Maneesh Sinha MS, MCh, DNB, Thyagaraj Krishna Prasad MS, DNB, Venkatesh Krishnamoorthy MS, MCh, FRCS","doi":"10.1111/ijun.12331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Medical literature on infection rates for certain specific endourological procedures is available. However, literature is lacking in providing a comprehensive view of the overall post endoscopic infection rates and their risk factors. This article attempts to provide an understanding of overall bacteriuria rate and discuss the contributory factors for common endourological procedures performed in a dedicated urology unit. This was a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent endourological procedures at our Institute between January 2019 and December 2019. The following factors were assessed as contributors to post-operative bacteriuria: gluteraldehyde versus plasma sterilization of endoscopic equipments, elective versus emergency procedures, age group, the presence of pre-operative foreign bodies, post-operative stent, chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetes mellitus (DM), procedure time and American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) grades. The overall post-operative bacteriuria rate was 17.85% in our total study population, 6.37% had symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI). Chronic kidney disease (OR 3.5, <i>p</i> < 0.003) and higher ASA grade (OR 1.92, <i>P</i> < 0.002) appear to confer the highest risk of bacteriuria. The factors which were associated with a trend towards a higher incidence of UTI without reaching statistical significance included: the use of gluteraldehyde versus plasma sterilization, pre-operative implants (Foley and ureteric stents), diabetes, advanced age, endoscopy time, post-operative stent emergency surgeries and a clinical decision against the use of prophylactic antibiotics. The overall rate of bacteriuria in all endourological procedures was 17.8%, 6.37% had symptomatic UTI. Chronic kidney disease and higher ASA grades were the most important contributing factors to develop post-operative bacteriuria.</p>","PeriodicalId":50281,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urological Nursing","volume":"17 1","pages":"45-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urological Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijun.12331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Medical literature on infection rates for certain specific endourological procedures is available. However, literature is lacking in providing a comprehensive view of the overall post endoscopic infection rates and their risk factors. This article attempts to provide an understanding of overall bacteriuria rate and discuss the contributory factors for common endourological procedures performed in a dedicated urology unit. This was a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent endourological procedures at our Institute between January 2019 and December 2019. The following factors were assessed as contributors to post-operative bacteriuria: gluteraldehyde versus plasma sterilization of endoscopic equipments, elective versus emergency procedures, age group, the presence of pre-operative foreign bodies, post-operative stent, chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetes mellitus (DM), procedure time and American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) grades. The overall post-operative bacteriuria rate was 17.85% in our total study population, 6.37% had symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI). Chronic kidney disease (OR 3.5, p < 0.003) and higher ASA grade (OR 1.92, P < 0.002) appear to confer the highest risk of bacteriuria. The factors which were associated with a trend towards a higher incidence of UTI without reaching statistical significance included: the use of gluteraldehyde versus plasma sterilization, pre-operative implants (Foley and ureteric stents), diabetes, advanced age, endoscopy time, post-operative stent emergency surgeries and a clinical decision against the use of prophylactic antibiotics. The overall rate of bacteriuria in all endourological procedures was 17.8%, 6.37% had symptomatic UTI. Chronic kidney disease and higher ASA grades were the most important contributing factors to develop post-operative bacteriuria.
关于某些特定泌尿道手术的感染率的医学文献是可用的。然而,文献缺乏提供整体内镜后感染率及其危险因素的综合观点。本文试图提供总体细菌率的理解,并讨论在专门的泌尿科单位进行的常见泌尿道手术的影响因素。这是对2019年1月至2019年12月期间在我们研究所接受泌尿系统手术的所有患者的回顾性分析。以下因素被评估为术后细菌尿的影响因素:内窥镜设备的gluter醛与血浆灭菌,选择性与紧急手术,年龄组,术前异物的存在,术后支架,慢性肾脏疾病(CKD),糖尿病(DM),手术时间和美国麻醉学会(ASA)分级。总研究人群术后细菌率为17.85%,有症状性尿路感染(UTI)为6.37%。慢性肾脏疾病(OR 3.5, p < 0.003)和较高的ASA分级(OR 1.92, p < 0.002)似乎具有最高的细菌尿风险。与尿路感染发生率升高趋势相关但未达到统计学意义的因素包括:使用谷戊醛与血浆灭菌、术前植入物(Foley和输尿管支架)、糖尿病、高龄、内镜检查时间、术后支架紧急手术和临床决定不使用预防性抗生素。所有泌尿系统手术中细菌尿的总发生率为17.8%,有症状性尿路感染的发生率为6.37%。慢性肾脏疾病和较高的ASA分级是发生术后细菌尿的最重要因素。
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Urological Nursing is an international peer-reviewed Journal for all nurses, non-specialist and specialist, who care for individuals with urological disorders. It is relevant for nurses working in a variety of settings: inpatient care, outpatient care, ambulatory care, community care, operating departments and specialist clinics. The Journal covers the whole spectrum of urological nursing skills and knowledge. It supports the publication of local issues of relevance to a wider international community to disseminate good practice.
The International Journal of Urological Nursing is clinically focused, evidence-based and welcomes contributions in the following clinical and non-clinical areas:
-General Urology-
Continence care-
Oncology-
Andrology-
Stoma care-
Paediatric urology-
Men’s health-
Uro-gynaecology-
Reconstructive surgery-
Clinical audit-
Clinical governance-
Nurse-led services-
Reflective analysis-
Education-
Management-
Research-
Leadership
The Journal welcomes original research papers, practice development papers and literature reviews. It also invites shorter papers such as case reports, critical commentary, reflective analysis and reports of audit, as well as contributions to regular sections such as the media reviews section. The International Journal of Urological Nursing supports the development of academic writing within the specialty and particularly welcomes papers from young researchers or practitioners who are seeking to build a publication profile.