“Nicht mitmachen!” and “Weitermachen!”: Rereading Adorno and Marcuse on Theory and Praxis

Bruna Furlan Miranda Della Torre, Eduardo Altheman
{"title":"“Nicht mitmachen!” and “Weitermachen!”: Rereading Adorno and Marcuse on Theory and Praxis","authors":"Bruna Furlan Miranda Della Torre, Eduardo Altheman","doi":"10.1080/08935696.2022.2026752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay discusses the relation between Theodor W. Adorno and Herbert Marcuse, with their dialogue on the political events of the 1960s student movements as its main axis. While these two critical theorists are usually taken as antithetical in their positions regarding this issue, the essay problematizes such a dualist conception by resorting not only to their theoretical works but also to their unpublished correspondence and other public interventions. The aim is to contextualize such texts and letters to present a more complex view of the debate in question.","PeriodicalId":45610,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2022.2026752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay discusses the relation between Theodor W. Adorno and Herbert Marcuse, with their dialogue on the political events of the 1960s student movements as its main axis. While these two critical theorists are usually taken as antithetical in their positions regarding this issue, the essay problematizes such a dualist conception by resorting not only to their theoretical works but also to their unpublished correspondence and other public interventions. The aim is to contextualize such texts and letters to present a more complex view of the debate in question.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“永远mitmachen !和“谢谢!”——重读《阿多诺与马尔库塞论理论与实践》
本文以阿多诺与马尔库塞对20世纪60年代学生运动中的政治事件的对话为主轴,探讨了阿多诺与马尔库塞的关系。虽然这两位批判理论家在这个问题上的立场通常是对立的,但这篇文章不仅通过诉诸他们的理论著作,还通过诉诸他们未发表的通信和其他公开干预,对这种二元论概念提出了质疑。其目的是将这些文本和信件置于背景中,以便对有关辩论提出更复杂的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
The Vulgar (in) Marxism: Vacillating between Exchange and Production Toward a Vulgar Transgender Marxism Vulgar, Crude, Foolish: Brecht, Teaching, Fascism Airbrushing Out Revolutionary Social Democracy: Lenin, Stalin, and Potresov on the Second International Editors’ Introduction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1