The End of Carbon Capitalism (as We Knew It)

IF 0.4 Q1 HISTORY Critical Historical Studies Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1086/716341
Brett Christophers
{"title":"The End of Carbon Capitalism (as We Knew It)","authors":"Brett Christophers","doi":"10.1086/716341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the nineteenth century, Karl Marx theorized the listed public company as the apogee of the capitalist mode of production, its “highest developed” form. A century later, in establishing shareholder-centric frameworks of corporate governance, Western policy makers effectively institutionalized this conceptualization, inasmuch as it was assumed that listed-public entities was indeed what most significant corporations either were or would become. During the long period when it was dominated by a handful of publicly listed Western “supermajors,” global fossil-fuel (coal, oil and gas) production, or what I term “carbon capitalism,” broadly conformed to type. Yet, beginning with the rise of the OPEC producing powers from the 1960s, the dominance of the listed public company model inexorably started to wane. That waning has accelerated, and taken new forms, in the new millennium, heralding the end of carbon capitalism as we knew it. This article examines the nature and implications of this ongoing transformation.","PeriodicalId":43410,"journal":{"name":"Critical Historical Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Historical Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/716341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In the nineteenth century, Karl Marx theorized the listed public company as the apogee of the capitalist mode of production, its “highest developed” form. A century later, in establishing shareholder-centric frameworks of corporate governance, Western policy makers effectively institutionalized this conceptualization, inasmuch as it was assumed that listed-public entities was indeed what most significant corporations either were or would become. During the long period when it was dominated by a handful of publicly listed Western “supermajors,” global fossil-fuel (coal, oil and gas) production, or what I term “carbon capitalism,” broadly conformed to type. Yet, beginning with the rise of the OPEC producing powers from the 1960s, the dominance of the listed public company model inexorably started to wane. That waning has accelerated, and taken new forms, in the new millennium, heralding the end of carbon capitalism as we knew it. This article examines the nature and implications of this ongoing transformation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
碳资本主义的终结(正如我们所知)
19世纪,卡尔·马克思将上市公司理论化为资本主义生产模式的顶点,即其“最高发展”的形式。一个世纪后,在建立以股东为中心的公司治理框架时,西方决策者有效地将这种概念化制度化,因为人们认为上市的公共实体确实是最重要的公司,要么是,要么将成为。在由少数公开上市的西方“超级大国”主导的漫长时期里,全球化石燃料(煤炭、石油和天然气)生产,或者我所说的“碳资本主义”,大致符合这一类型。然而,从20世纪60年代欧佩克生产大国的崛起开始,上市上市公司模式的主导地位开始无情地减弱。在新的千年里,这种衰退加速了,并采取了新的形式,预示着我们所知道的碳资本主义的终结。本文探讨了这种正在进行的转变的性质和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Colonialism, Surplus Population, and the Marxian Critique of Political Economy Hayek against Malthus: Julian Simon’s Neoliberal Critique of Environmentalism Temporalities of Emancipation: Women, Work, and Time in 1970s America Reactionaries Marching Forward: On Worldmaking and Its Enemies Enclosed Futures: Oil Extraction in the Republic of Congo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1