Monitoring the safety of influenza A/H1N1 pandemic and seasonal vaccines in Morocco

A. Tebaa, R. Benkirane, L. Alj, I. Cherkaoui, R. Soulaymani-Bencheikh
{"title":"Monitoring the safety of influenza A/H1N1 pandemic and seasonal vaccines in Morocco","authors":"A. Tebaa, R. Benkirane, L. Alj, I. Cherkaoui, R. Soulaymani-Bencheikh","doi":"10.1177/25151355221088157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: A vaccination campaign against pandemic influenza A/H1N1 was implemented in Morocco between November 2009 and April 2010. Overall, 705,883 subjects were vaccinated by Pandemrix, Arepanrix, and Panenza. The adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) data comparison was made with the 2014/2015 seasonal influenza vaccination campaign that was specifically investigated. Aim: To evaluate the safety of the 2009 pandemic influenza A/H1N1 vaccine and to compare it to that of 2014 seasonal influenza vaccine. Methods: During the pandemic vaccination campaign, the Morocco Pharmacovigilance Centre reinforced passive AEFI surveillance with an active and prospective monitoring programme of 1000 immunized people over 6 months at 10 randomly selected vaccination centres. For the 2014/2015 seasonal vaccination campaign, AEFI data were collected from spontaneous notifications. Results: Active monitoring of 2009 pandemic collected 771 AEFI reports, corresponding to an AEFI incidence rate of 77.1% with vaccination by either Pandemrix or Arepanrix vaccine in 95% of cases. Reported AEFI were most frequently local (37.7%), general (29.5%), and neurological reactions (20.3%). Most of the AEFI (95.5%) were observed during the first 48 hours after vaccination, and the remainder within 2 weeks. None of the reported AEFI were serious case. The highest rate of notification was documented for health professionals, followed by patients with diabetes or chronic respiratory diseases. Concerning passive surveillance, the AEFI notification rate was significantly higher for the 2009/2010 pandemic vaccine (3.1 vs 1.2 per 10,000). However, there was no significant difference between pandemic and seasonal vaccination with regards to the serious adverse events (SAE) notification rate (0.3 vs 0.2 per 10,000). Conclusion: Data analysis indicates that the vaccines used against 2009 pandemic influenza in Morocco have a satisfactory safety profile, similar to the seasonal influenza vaccine with the exception of local reactions as observed previously in other countries.","PeriodicalId":33285,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25151355221088157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A vaccination campaign against pandemic influenza A/H1N1 was implemented in Morocco between November 2009 and April 2010. Overall, 705,883 subjects were vaccinated by Pandemrix, Arepanrix, and Panenza. The adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) data comparison was made with the 2014/2015 seasonal influenza vaccination campaign that was specifically investigated. Aim: To evaluate the safety of the 2009 pandemic influenza A/H1N1 vaccine and to compare it to that of 2014 seasonal influenza vaccine. Methods: During the pandemic vaccination campaign, the Morocco Pharmacovigilance Centre reinforced passive AEFI surveillance with an active and prospective monitoring programme of 1000 immunized people over 6 months at 10 randomly selected vaccination centres. For the 2014/2015 seasonal vaccination campaign, AEFI data were collected from spontaneous notifications. Results: Active monitoring of 2009 pandemic collected 771 AEFI reports, corresponding to an AEFI incidence rate of 77.1% with vaccination by either Pandemrix or Arepanrix vaccine in 95% of cases. Reported AEFI were most frequently local (37.7%), general (29.5%), and neurological reactions (20.3%). Most of the AEFI (95.5%) were observed during the first 48 hours after vaccination, and the remainder within 2 weeks. None of the reported AEFI were serious case. The highest rate of notification was documented for health professionals, followed by patients with diabetes or chronic respiratory diseases. Concerning passive surveillance, the AEFI notification rate was significantly higher for the 2009/2010 pandemic vaccine (3.1 vs 1.2 per 10,000). However, there was no significant difference between pandemic and seasonal vaccination with regards to the serious adverse events (SAE) notification rate (0.3 vs 0.2 per 10,000). Conclusion: Data analysis indicates that the vaccines used against 2009 pandemic influenza in Morocco have a satisfactory safety profile, similar to the seasonal influenza vaccine with the exception of local reactions as observed previously in other countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
监测摩洛哥甲型H1N1流感大流行疫苗和季节性疫苗的安全性
背景:摩洛哥于2009年11月至2010年4月期间开展了针对甲型H1N1大流行性流感的疫苗接种运动。总体而言,705,883名受试者接种了Pandemrix、Arepanrix和Panenza疫苗。免疫接种后不良事件(AEFIs)数据与2014/2015年季节性流感疫苗接种运动进行了比较。目的:评价2009年甲型H1N1流感大流行疫苗的安全性,并与2014年季节性流感疫苗进行比较。方法:在大流行疫苗接种运动期间,摩洛哥药物警戒中心加强了被动AEFI监测,在10个随机选择的疫苗接种中心开展了为期6个月的主动和前瞻性监测计划,对1000名接种者进行了免疫接种。对于2014/2015年季节性疫苗接种运动,AEFI数据是从自发通报中收集的。结果:2009年大流行的主动监测收集了771份AEFI报告,对应的AEFI发病率为77.1%,95%的病例接种了Pandemrix或Arepanrix疫苗。报告的AEFI最常见的是局部(37.7%),一般(29.5%)和神经反应(20.3%)。大多数AEFI(95.5%)发生在接种后48小时内,其余发生在2周内。报告的急性呼吸道感染无严重病例。报告率最高的是卫生专业人员,其次是糖尿病或慢性呼吸系统疾病患者。在被动监测方面,2009/2010年大流行性流感疫苗的AEFI通报率要高得多(3.1 vs 1.2 / 10,000)。然而,在严重不良事件(SAE)通报率方面,大流行疫苗和季节性疫苗之间没有显著差异(0.3 vs 0.2 / 10,000)。结论:数据分析表明,摩洛哥用于预防2009年大流行性流感的疫苗具有令人满意的安全性,与季节性流感疫苗类似,但以前在其他国家观察到的局部反应除外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy
Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Knowledge, attitude, and acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine in pregnant women. Comparative 60-day effectiveness of bivalent versus monovalent mRNA vaccines in Shelby County: a population-level analysis. Vaccination practices and knowledge among adults with hemoglobinopathies in Greece: a nationwide survey. Media literacy: exploring the key to social media influences for wise parental decision-making on vaccines. Monoclonal IgY antibodies: advancements and limitations for immunodiagnosis and immunotherapy applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1