Machiavellian Individuals’ Reciprocation Tend to be Smaller in a Trust Game

Linda Szíjjártó, Ferenc Kocsor, T. Bereczkei
{"title":"Machiavellian Individuals’ Reciprocation Tend to be Smaller in a Trust Game","authors":"Linda Szíjjártó, Ferenc Kocsor, T. Bereczkei","doi":"10.22330/HEB/331/039-048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Machiavellianism is a combination of a behavioral strategy characterized by the tendency to manipulate and exploit others, and a worldview resting upon cynicism and opportunism. The aim of our study was to explore the extent to which highly Machiavellian people tend to trust others and reciprocate favors. To model everyday relationships, we used the so-called Trust Game: a two-person experimental situation in which participants took part with a stranger as a partner. Eighty university students participated in the study, and played for real money. Their inclination to Machiavellian behavior was measured by the Mach IV questionnaire. Our results showed that there was no significant difference in the deposits made by the first players between high and low Machs; as first players, high Machs tended to trust the other player to the same degree than low Mach participants. We also found that high Machs as second players are less likely than low Mach participants to reciprocate the favors of the other player. From the results, it might be inferred that Machiavellians make decisions in cold blood; they do not trust others and reciprocate rather moderately, regardless of the amount of money they have received from the partner.","PeriodicalId":91082,"journal":{"name":"Human ethology bulletin","volume":"33 1","pages":"39-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human ethology bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22330/HEB/331/039-048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Machiavellianism is a combination of a behavioral strategy characterized by the tendency to manipulate and exploit others, and a worldview resting upon cynicism and opportunism. The aim of our study was to explore the extent to which highly Machiavellian people tend to trust others and reciprocate favors. To model everyday relationships, we used the so-called Trust Game: a two-person experimental situation in which participants took part with a stranger as a partner. Eighty university students participated in the study, and played for real money. Their inclination to Machiavellian behavior was measured by the Mach IV questionnaire. Our results showed that there was no significant difference in the deposits made by the first players between high and low Machs; as first players, high Machs tended to trust the other player to the same degree than low Mach participants. We also found that high Machs as second players are less likely than low Mach participants to reciprocate the favors of the other player. From the results, it might be inferred that Machiavellians make decisions in cold blood; they do not trust others and reciprocate rather moderately, regardless of the amount of money they have received from the partner.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信任博弈中马基雅维利式个体的互惠趋向于较小
马基雅维利主义是一种行为策略的结合,其特征是倾向于操纵和利用他人,以及基于玩世不恭和机会主义的世界观。我们研究的目的是探索高度马基雅维利主义的人倾向于信任他人和回报他人的程度。为了模拟日常关系,我们使用了所谓的信任游戏:一个两个人的实验情境,参与者与一个陌生人作为合作伙伴。80名大学生参加了这项研究,并进行了真钱游戏。他们对马基雅维利行为的倾向是通过马赫IV问卷来测量的。结果表明:高、低马赫数的第一玩家的存款没有显著差异;作为第一玩家,高马赫参与者倾向于信任其他玩家的程度与低马赫参与者相同。我们还发现,作为第二玩家的高马赫参与者比低马赫参与者更不可能回报其他玩家的恩惠。从结果可以推断,马基雅维利主义者是冷血地做决定的;他们不相信别人,不管从对方那里得到多少钱,他们的回报都相当温和。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ISHE Travels to Amazon: A Narrative of a Special Issue Based on the XXII ISHE Conference, 5-9 August 2014 in Belém, Brazil The Ethologist’s Corner The Trouble With Certainty in the Study of Human Evolution Women at the “Sight” of Evolution A Lost Idea in Psychology: Observation as Starting Point for the Scientific Investigation of Human Behavior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1