Impacts of climate pact on global oil and gas sector stocks

IF 2.3 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Studies in Economics and Finance Pub Date : 2023-07-11 DOI:10.1108/sef-03-2023-0149
V. Kumari, Rima Assaf, Faten Moussa, Dharen Kumar Pandey
{"title":"Impacts of climate pact on global oil and gas sector stocks","authors":"V. Kumari, Rima Assaf, Faten Moussa, Dharen Kumar Pandey","doi":"10.1108/sef-03-2023-0149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this study is to examine the impacts of the Glasgow Climate Pact on global oil and gas sector stocks. Further, this study also examines if the nations' Climate Change Performance Index (CCPI) and World Energy Trilemma Index (WETI) drive the abnormal returns around the event.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors apply the event study analysis to 691 global oil and gas firms across 52 countries. Further, they apply the cross-sectional examination of cumulative abnormal returns (CARs) across 502 firms.\n\n\nFindings\nThe emerging markets experienced significant negative abnormal returns on the event day. The CCPI negatively affects longer pre-event CARs, while WETI significantly negatively associates with CARs during longer pre- and post-event windows. Volatility is negatively related to pre- and post-event abnormal returns, while past returns positively drive pre-event period CARs but negatively drive post-event window CARs. This study finds an interesting association between liquidity (CACL) and CARs, as CACL positively drives pre-event CARs, but post-event CARs are negatively associated with CACL. The CARs do not significantly correlate with leverage, size and book-to-market ratio.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis study's findings on the impact of climate risks on financial markets have significant implications for global regulatory bodies. Policymakers should reduce stock volatility and enhance environmental disclosures by publicly traded companies to accurately price and assess the potential impacts of climate risks. Governments should examine the effects of environmental restrictions on investor behavior, especially in developing countries with limited access to capital. Therefore, policymakers need to consider the far-reaching impacts of environmental regulations while introducing them.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nClimate risks are expected to impact the global financial market significantly. Prior studies provide limited evidence on how such climate pacts impact the oil and gas sector. Hence, this study, while bridging this gap, provides important implications for policymakers and stakeholders, particularly the emerging markets that are more sensitive.\n","PeriodicalId":45607,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Economics and Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sef-03-2023-0149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine the impacts of the Glasgow Climate Pact on global oil and gas sector stocks. Further, this study also examines if the nations' Climate Change Performance Index (CCPI) and World Energy Trilemma Index (WETI) drive the abnormal returns around the event. Design/methodology/approach The authors apply the event study analysis to 691 global oil and gas firms across 52 countries. Further, they apply the cross-sectional examination of cumulative abnormal returns (CARs) across 502 firms. Findings The emerging markets experienced significant negative abnormal returns on the event day. The CCPI negatively affects longer pre-event CARs, while WETI significantly negatively associates with CARs during longer pre- and post-event windows. Volatility is negatively related to pre- and post-event abnormal returns, while past returns positively drive pre-event period CARs but negatively drive post-event window CARs. This study finds an interesting association between liquidity (CACL) and CARs, as CACL positively drives pre-event CARs, but post-event CARs are negatively associated with CACL. The CARs do not significantly correlate with leverage, size and book-to-market ratio. Practical implications This study's findings on the impact of climate risks on financial markets have significant implications for global regulatory bodies. Policymakers should reduce stock volatility and enhance environmental disclosures by publicly traded companies to accurately price and assess the potential impacts of climate risks. Governments should examine the effects of environmental restrictions on investor behavior, especially in developing countries with limited access to capital. Therefore, policymakers need to consider the far-reaching impacts of environmental regulations while introducing them. Originality/value Climate risks are expected to impact the global financial market significantly. Prior studies provide limited evidence on how such climate pacts impact the oil and gas sector. Hence, this study, while bridging this gap, provides important implications for policymakers and stakeholders, particularly the emerging markets that are more sensitive.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
气候协议对全球油气行业股票的影响
目的本研究的目的是考察《格拉斯哥气候公约》对全球石油和天然气行业存量的影响。此外,本研究还考察了各国的气候变化绩效指数(CCPI)和世界能源三重困境指数(WETI)是否推动了该事件的异常回报。设计/方法/方法作者将事件研究分析应用于52个国家的691家全球石油和天然气公司。此外,他们对502家公司的累积异常回报率(CAR)进行了横断面检查。发现新兴市场在活动当天出现了显著的负异常回报。CCPI对较长的事件前CAR产生负面影响,而WETI在较长的事件前后窗口期间与CAR显著负相关。波动性与事件前和事件后的异常回报呈负相关,而过去的回报正驱动事件前时段CAR,但负驱动事件后窗口CAR。本研究发现,流动性(CACL)与CAR之间存在有趣的关联,因为CACL正驱动事件前的CAR,但事件后的CAR与CACL负相关。CAR与杠杆率、规模和账面市值比率没有显著相关性。实际意义这项关于气候风险对金融市场影响的研究结果对全球监管机构具有重要意义。政策制定者应减少股票波动,并加强上市公司的环境披露,以准确定价和评估气候风险的潜在影响。各国政府应研究环境限制对投资者行为的影响,特别是在获得资本机会有限的发展中国家。因此,政策制定者在引入环境法规时需要考虑其深远影响。原创性/价值气候风险预计将对全球金融市场产生重大影响。先前的研究对此类气候协议如何影响石油和天然气行业提供了有限的证据。因此,这项研究在弥合这一差距的同时,为政策制定者和利益相关者,特别是更敏感的新兴市场,提供了重要的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Topics addressed in the journal include: ■corporate finance, ■financial markets, ■money and banking, ■international finance and economics, ■investments, ■risk management, ■theory of the firm, ■competition policy, ■corporate governance.
期刊最新文献
Unraveling exogenous shocks, financial stress and US economic performance Influence of Ukrainian refugees on the exchange rate and stock market in neighboring countries How do commodity futures respond to Ukraine–Russia, Taiwan Strait and Hamas–Israel crises? – An analysis using event study approach How do commodity futures respond to Ukraine–Russia, Taiwan Strait and Hamas–Israel crises? – An analysis using event study approach The ups and downs of oil prices: asymmetric impacts of oil price volatility on corporate environmental responsibility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1