Challenges and Enablers to Integrate Land-Sea-Interactions in Cross-Border Marine and Coastal Planning: Experiences from the Pan Baltic Scope Collaboration

IF 2 Q3 REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING Planning Practice and Research Pub Date : 2022-05-04 DOI:10.1080/02697459.2022.2074112
A. Morf, J. Moodie, Elin Cedergren, S. Eliasen, K. Gee, M. Kull, Sarah Mahadeo, S. Husa, M. Vološina
{"title":"Challenges and Enablers to Integrate Land-Sea-Interactions in Cross-Border Marine and Coastal Planning: Experiences from the Pan Baltic Scope Collaboration","authors":"A. Morf, J. Moodie, Elin Cedergren, S. Eliasen, K. Gee, M. Kull, Sarah Mahadeo, S. Husa, M. Vološina","doi":"10.1080/02697459.2022.2074112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper analyses challenges and enablers for integrating a transboundary land-sea interaction (LSI) perspective into marine spatial planning (MSP) practice as experienced in the Baltic Sea Region. Collaborative research results from the Pan Baltic Scope project indicate that LSI remains an amorphous concept, particularly within a transboundary MSP context. Difficulty lies in bridging planning practices across land and sea and between varying uses, administrative settings and governance functions. Addressing LSI requires capacity, time, resources, awareness, reflection, and forums for collaborative learning across sectors and governance levels.","PeriodicalId":54201,"journal":{"name":"Planning Practice and Research","volume":"37 1","pages":"333 - 354"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Planning Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2022.2074112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper analyses challenges and enablers for integrating a transboundary land-sea interaction (LSI) perspective into marine spatial planning (MSP) practice as experienced in the Baltic Sea Region. Collaborative research results from the Pan Baltic Scope project indicate that LSI remains an amorphous concept, particularly within a transboundary MSP context. Difficulty lies in bridging planning practices across land and sea and between varying uses, administrative settings and governance functions. Addressing LSI requires capacity, time, resources, awareness, reflection, and forums for collaborative learning across sectors and governance levels.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨国界海洋和沿海规划中整合陆海相互作用的挑战和推动因素:来自泛波罗的海范围合作的经验
摘要本文分析了将跨界陆海相互作用(LSI)视角纳入波罗的海地区海洋空间规划(MSP)实践的挑战和促成因素。泛波罗的海范围项目的合作研究结果表明,LSI仍然是一个无定形的概念,特别是在跨界MSP背景下。困难在于将陆地和海洋之间以及不同用途、行政环境和治理职能之间的规划实践联系起来。解决LSI问题需要跨部门和治理级别的协作学习能力、时间、资源、意识、反思和论坛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Planning Practice and Research
Planning Practice and Research REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Over the last decade, Planning Practice & Research (PPR) has established itself as the source for information on current research in planning practice. It is intended for reflective, critical academics, professionals and students who are concerned to keep abreast of and challenge current thinking. PPR is committed to: •bridging the gaps between planning research, practice and education, and between different planning systems •providing a forum for an international readership to discuss and review research on planning practice
期刊最新文献
Scenario planning and planning support systems tested in a graduate-level planning studio in Bogotá The (unprivileged) polluter pays: Conflict of Rights in Delhi’s stormwater drain-adjacent ‘informal’ settlements Civilizing practices and created spaces: resistance processes in the San Francisco (Paraguay) and Ismael Silva-Zé Keti (Brazil) housing projects Shifts in planning tradition amid an economic crisis and in light of a planning reform: the case of Greece ‘What planners don’t do is plan’: recovering the English strategic spatial planning imagination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1