It’s not only about the leader. Oligarchized personalization and preference voting in Belgium

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Party Politics Pub Date : 2023-05-05 DOI:10.1177/13540688231172339
Jérémy Dodeigne, J. Pilet
{"title":"It’s not only about the leader. Oligarchized personalization and preference voting in Belgium","authors":"Jérémy Dodeigne, J. Pilet","doi":"10.1177/13540688231172339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on the electoral personalization of politics has stressed a trend towards a greater role of top prominent political figures (party leaders and ministers). This trend was described as centralized electoral personalization. Yet, this trend is merely one side of a more complex story. No leader attracts all voters’ support, and other candidates manage to stand out despite lower resources and visibility. Using a unique dataset of 47,239 actual ballot papers cast for the 2018 Belgian local elections, we show that candidates-level, lists-level and districts-level factors result in distinct preference voting behaviour. While these factors lead to unmistakable forms of (de-)centralized personalized forms of elections, we, furthermore, show that intermediary situations distinctively emerge. A significant number of ‘subtop’ candidates stand out among candidates, by attracting support from voters who do not support the mere leader of the list. This ‘oligarchized personalization’ would deserve greater attention in the literature.","PeriodicalId":48122,"journal":{"name":"Party Politics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Party Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688231172339","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on the electoral personalization of politics has stressed a trend towards a greater role of top prominent political figures (party leaders and ministers). This trend was described as centralized electoral personalization. Yet, this trend is merely one side of a more complex story. No leader attracts all voters’ support, and other candidates manage to stand out despite lower resources and visibility. Using a unique dataset of 47,239 actual ballot papers cast for the 2018 Belgian local elections, we show that candidates-level, lists-level and districts-level factors result in distinct preference voting behaviour. While these factors lead to unmistakable forms of (de-)centralized personalized forms of elections, we, furthermore, show that intermediary situations distinctively emerge. A significant number of ‘subtop’ candidates stand out among candidates, by attracting support from voters who do not support the mere leader of the list. This ‘oligarchized personalization’ would deserve greater attention in the literature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
这不仅仅关乎领导者。比利时寡头化的个性化和偏好投票
对政治选举个性化的研究强调了最高知名政治人物(政党领导人和部长)发挥更大作用的趋势。这种趋势被描述为集中的选举个性化。然而,这一趋势只是一个更为复杂的故事的一个侧面。没有一位领导人能吸引所有选民的支持,尽管资源和知名度较低,但其他候选人仍能脱颖而出。使用一个由47239张2018年比利时地方选举实际选票组成的独特数据集,我们发现候选人级别、名单级别和地区级别的因素会导致不同的偏好投票行为。虽然这些因素导致了明确无误的(去)集中的个性化选举形式,但我们进一步表明,中介情况明显出现。有相当多的“小标题”候选人在候选人中脱颖而出,因为他们吸引了不支持名单中唯一领导人的选民的支持。这种“寡头化的个性化”值得在文学中给予更多关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Party Politics
Party Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
137
期刊介绍: Political parties are intrinsic to every democratic political system, and with the dramatic changes that regularly sweep the political landscape, the study of their function and form is one of the most dynamic areas within contemporary scholarship. Party Politics is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the study of this integral component within political science. This major international journal provides a forum for the analysis of political parties, including their historical development, structure, policy programmes, ideology, electoral and campaign strategies, and their role within the various national and international political systems of which they are a part.
期刊最新文献
Common sense, populism, and reactionary politics on Twitter: An analysis of populist far-right common sense narratives between 2008 and 2022 ‘Party position, electoral incentives, and attention to European Union issues in the 2019 European Parliament election’ Book Review: The closed partisan mind – A new psychology of American polarization Book Review: The Republican Evolution: From Governing Party to Antigovernment Party, 1860-2020 State government control and partisan happiness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1