Examining the Potential Use of a Novel Radiographic Scoring System for Determining Surgical Intervention in Diabetic Charcot Arthropathy

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Foot and Ankle Specialist Pub Date : 2017-06-01 DOI:10.1177/1938640016675407
R. Bijlani, L. Lomasney, M. Pinzur, Katherine E Dux
{"title":"Examining the Potential Use of a Novel Radiographic Scoring System for Determining Surgical Intervention in Diabetic Charcot Arthropathy","authors":"R. Bijlani, L. Lomasney, M. Pinzur, Katherine E Dux","doi":"10.1177/1938640016675407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Although Eichenholtz and the Schon systems are commonly used to evaluate foot Charcot arthropathy on radiographs, a novel system with expanded characterization may have added benefit. Methods. Patients with Charcot arthropathy and foot radiographs were grouped in nonsurgical group 1 (imaging sets at minimum 2-year interval) and surgical group 2 (imaging preceding fusion and/or amputation). Radiographs were scored with Eichenholtz and Schon systems, and a novel scoring system (summation of 0-3 rank for bone density, distention/swelling, debris, disorganization, and dislocation/subluxation). Summative scores of the 2 groups were compared. Differences in scores of each system from serial images of group 1 were compared and average scores from each of the systems for preoperative imaging sets of group 2 were compared. Results. A total of 111 patients were included (group 1, 19 patients; group 2, 92 patients). The novel system provided a broad numerical characterization of the radiographs (range 1-15). Summative scores of the novel system for groups 1 and 2 were statistically different with lower median score in the nonsurgical group (nonsurgical median score 6 vs surgical median score 9). Individual characteristic scores from 4 (distention, debris, disorganization, and dislocation) of 5 categories for the novel system were statistically different, with lower scores for the nonoperative group. The narrower numerical scores from the Eichenholtz and Schon systems did not yield statistically significant results. Conclusion. The novel scoring system provides a broad numerical description of radiographic findings in Charcot arthropathy of the foot and has potential advantage for surgical predictive value. Levels of Evidence: Level IV: Retrospective","PeriodicalId":39271,"journal":{"name":"Foot and Ankle Specialist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1938640016675407","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot and Ankle Specialist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1938640016675407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction. Although Eichenholtz and the Schon systems are commonly used to evaluate foot Charcot arthropathy on radiographs, a novel system with expanded characterization may have added benefit. Methods. Patients with Charcot arthropathy and foot radiographs were grouped in nonsurgical group 1 (imaging sets at minimum 2-year interval) and surgical group 2 (imaging preceding fusion and/or amputation). Radiographs were scored with Eichenholtz and Schon systems, and a novel scoring system (summation of 0-3 rank for bone density, distention/swelling, debris, disorganization, and dislocation/subluxation). Summative scores of the 2 groups were compared. Differences in scores of each system from serial images of group 1 were compared and average scores from each of the systems for preoperative imaging sets of group 2 were compared. Results. A total of 111 patients were included (group 1, 19 patients; group 2, 92 patients). The novel system provided a broad numerical characterization of the radiographs (range 1-15). Summative scores of the novel system for groups 1 and 2 were statistically different with lower median score in the nonsurgical group (nonsurgical median score 6 vs surgical median score 9). Individual characteristic scores from 4 (distention, debris, disorganization, and dislocation) of 5 categories for the novel system were statistically different, with lower scores for the nonoperative group. The narrower numerical scores from the Eichenholtz and Schon systems did not yield statistically significant results. Conclusion. The novel scoring system provides a broad numerical description of radiographic findings in Charcot arthropathy of the foot and has potential advantage for surgical predictive value. Levels of Evidence: Level IV: Retrospective
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探讨一种新的影像学评分系统在确定糖尿病性关节炎手术干预中的潜在应用
介绍。虽然Eichenholtz和Schon系统通常用于在x线片上评估足部Charcot关节病,但一种扩展表征的新系统可能会带来额外的好处。方法。Charcot关节病患者和足部x线片分为非手术1组(至少间隔2年进行影像学检查)和手术2组(融合和/或截肢前影像学检查)。x线片采用Eichenholtz和Schon评分系统,以及一种新的评分系统(骨密度、膨胀/肿胀、碎片、组织紊乱和脱位/半脱位的0-3级评分总和)。比较两组患者的综合评分。比较第1组连续影像中各系统评分的差异,比较第2组术前影像集各系统评分的平均值。结果。共纳入111例患者(第1组,19例;第二组92例)。新系统提供了x线片的广泛数值表征(范围1-15)。新系统1组和2组的总得分有统计学差异,非手术组的中位得分较低(非手术中位得分6 vs手术中位得分9)。新系统5个类别中4个(膨胀、碎片、组织紊乱、脱位)的个体特征得分有统计学差异,非手术组得分较低。来自Eichenholtz和Schon系统的较窄的数值分数没有产生统计上显著的结果。结论。新的评分系统为足部Charcot关节病的影像学表现提供了广泛的数值描述,并具有外科预测价值的潜在优势。证据级别:IV级:回顾性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Foot and Ankle Specialist
Foot and Ankle Specialist Health Professions-Podiatry
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
100
期刊最新文献
Outcomes Following Repeat Ankle Arthroscopy and Microfracture for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus. A Cadaveric Study Verifying the Potential of a Rotational Biplanar Chevron Osteotomy to Correct the 3-Dimensional Hallux Valgus Deformity. Sleep Apnea and Postoperative Medical Complications and Health Care Expenditures Following Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Bimalleolar Ankle Fractures. An Operational Definition of First Ray Hypermobility Calendar for June 2022
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1