CHARACTERISTICS OF INNOVATION ECOSYSTEMS’ GOVERNANCE: AN INTEGRATIVE LITERATURE REVIEW

Micheline Gaia Hoffmann, Elizabeth Murad, Dannyela DA CUNHA LEMOS, Josivania Silva Farias, Beatriz Lancellotti Sanches
{"title":"CHARACTERISTICS OF INNOVATION ECOSYSTEMS’ GOVERNANCE: AN INTEGRATIVE LITERATURE REVIEW","authors":"Micheline Gaia Hoffmann, Elizabeth Murad, Dannyela DA CUNHA LEMOS, Josivania Silva Farias, Beatriz Lancellotti Sanches","doi":"10.1142/s1363919622500621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research aims to systematise governance characteristics of innovation ecosystems (IE) through an integrative literature review from SciELO, Scopus, and WOS since there is little research discussing governance applied to IE. The following categories emerged from the content analysis: governance approach; actors and roles; the relationship among actors; coordination mechanisms; common objective and value cocreation; goals and evaluation. The results show that governance is approached from different theoretical lenses, with the predominance of literature on network governance. There is also an emphasis on the orchestration concept. Furthermore, results suggest that IE governance is related to practices that align actors with roles and responsibilities oriented to common objectives, leading to value creation. The involvement of actors who collaboratively develop trust and capabilities, share knowledge and information, and generate innovations, technologies, and solutions, stands out. These collaborations may be organic and self-organised or deliberate and orchestrated.","PeriodicalId":47711,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovation Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Innovation Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s1363919622500621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The research aims to systematise governance characteristics of innovation ecosystems (IE) through an integrative literature review from SciELO, Scopus, and WOS since there is little research discussing governance applied to IE. The following categories emerged from the content analysis: governance approach; actors and roles; the relationship among actors; coordination mechanisms; common objective and value cocreation; goals and evaluation. The results show that governance is approached from different theoretical lenses, with the predominance of literature on network governance. There is also an emphasis on the orchestration concept. Furthermore, results suggest that IE governance is related to practices that align actors with roles and responsibilities oriented to common objectives, leading to value creation. The involvement of actors who collaboratively develop trust and capabilities, share knowledge and information, and generate innovations, technologies, and solutions, stands out. These collaborations may be organic and self-organised or deliberate and orchestrated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创新生态系统治理特征:综合文献综述
由于目前关于创新生态系统治理的研究较少,本研究旨在通过SciELO、Scopus和WOS的综合文献综述,将创新生态系统(IE)的治理特征系统化。从内容分析中可以得出以下类别:治理方法;演员和角色;行动者之间的关系;协调机制;共同目标与价值共创;目标和评估。结果表明,从不同的理论视角来探讨治理,以网络治理文献为主。还有一个重点是编排概念。此外,结果表明,IE治理与使参与者与面向共同目标的角色和责任保持一致的实践有关,从而导致价值创造。合作发展信任和能力、共享知识和信息、产生创新、技术和解决方案的参与者的参与是突出的。这些合作可能是有机的、自我组织的,也可能是深思熟虑的、精心策划的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Innovation (IJIM) is the official journal of the International Society of Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM). Both the IJIM and ISPIM adopt a multi-disciplinary approach to addressing the many challenges of managing innovation, rather than a narrow focus on a single aspect such as technology, R&D or new product development. Both are also international, inclusive & practical, and encourage active interaction between academics, managers and consultants.
期刊最新文献
CULTURAL TENSIONS AND VALUES-ACTION GAPS IN SUSTAINABILITY-ORIENTED INNOVATION: AN ETHNOGRAPHIC INQUIRY BIG DATA GOVERNANCE AND INNOVATION PERFORMANCE: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF BIG DATA ANALYTIC CAPABILITIES AND ORGANISATIONAL AGILITY MOTIVATING FOR INNOVATING: EXAMINING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN REGULATORY FOCUS AND WORKPLACE INNOVATION HUMAN JUDGMENT IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR BUSINESS DECISION-MAKING: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY REPUTATION AND TRUST OF PRINCIPALS AND AGENTS IN INTERORGANISATIONAL RELATIONS — THE CASE OF INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH COOPERATION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1