Disaster Preparedness and Housing Tenure: How Do Subsidized Renters Fare?

IF 2.8 3区 经济学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Housing Policy Debate Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-04 DOI:10.1080/10511482.2023.2224309
Sarah McCarthy, Samantha Friedman
{"title":"Disaster Preparedness and Housing Tenure: How Do Subsidized Renters Fare?","authors":"Sarah McCarthy, Samantha Friedman","doi":"10.1080/10511482.2023.2224309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Homeowners are significantly more prepared for disasters than renters. However, disaster preparedness among subsidized renters is an understudied topic despite their increased vulnerability to negative disaster outcomes. Previous research shows that one in three subsidized units is at risk for exposure to disasters, relative to one in four unsubsidized rental units, and one in seven owner-occupied units. Subsidized housing residents often fall into many vulnerable statuses that would make them less prepared than renters and owners. Using 2017 American Housing Survey data, we examine differences in household disaster preparedness by housing tenure, with and without controls for such factors. Logistic regression analyses indicate that subsidized renters are significantly less prepared than unsubsidized renters, and both renter types are significantly less prepared than homeowners, controlling for demographic and neighborhood characteristics. The policy implications of this research are considered as they relate to the location and management of subsidized housing in an era of climate change.</p>","PeriodicalId":47744,"journal":{"name":"Housing Policy Debate","volume":"33 1","pages":"1100-1123"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10846867/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Housing Policy Debate","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2023.2224309","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Homeowners are significantly more prepared for disasters than renters. However, disaster preparedness among subsidized renters is an understudied topic despite their increased vulnerability to negative disaster outcomes. Previous research shows that one in three subsidized units is at risk for exposure to disasters, relative to one in four unsubsidized rental units, and one in seven owner-occupied units. Subsidized housing residents often fall into many vulnerable statuses that would make them less prepared than renters and owners. Using 2017 American Housing Survey data, we examine differences in household disaster preparedness by housing tenure, with and without controls for such factors. Logistic regression analyses indicate that subsidized renters are significantly less prepared than unsubsidized renters, and both renter types are significantly less prepared than homeowners, controlling for demographic and neighborhood characteristics. The policy implications of this research are considered as they relate to the location and management of subsidized housing in an era of climate change.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
备灾与住房保有权:补贴租房者的价格如何?
房主比租房者对灾难的准备要充分得多。然而,尽管受补贴的租房者更容易受到负面灾难后果的影响,但他们的备灾能力仍未得到充分研究。先前的研究表明,三分之一的补贴单位面临遭受灾害的风险,而四分之一的无补贴租赁单位和七分之一的自住单位则面临风险。保障性住房的居民往往处于许多弱势地位,这将使他们比租房者和房主准备得更少。利用2017年美国住房调查数据,我们研究了住房使用权在家庭备灾方面的差异,并对这些因素进行了控制。Logistic回归分析表明,在控制了人口统计和社区特征后,有补贴的租房者的准备程度明显低于无补贴的租房者,两种租房者的准备程度都明显低于自有住房者。本研究的政策含义被认为与气候变化时代补贴住房的定位和管理有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
17.20%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Housing Policy Debate provides a venue for original research on U.S. housing policy. Subjects include affordable housing policy, fair housing policy, land use regulations influencing housing affordability, metropolitan development trends, and linkages among housing policy and energy, environmental, and transportation policy. Housing Policy Debate is published quarterly. Most issues feature a Forum section and an Articles section. The Forum, which highlights a current debate, features a central article and responding comments that represent a range of perspectives. All articles in the Forum and Articles sections undergo a double-blind peer review process.
期刊最新文献
Retraction: The Effect of Rent Control Status on Eviction Filing Rates: Causal Evidence from San Francisco The Effect of Rent Control Status on Eviction Filing Rates: Causal Evidence From San Francisco Game of Homes: Carrots, Sticks, and the Puzzle of Housing Vacancies “This Voicemail Box Is Full”: Landlord Perceptions of Communication Issues as a Key Challenge to Participating in the Housing Choice Voucher Program “Especially Being Homeless, They Just Think You’re Infected with COVID or Something”: A Qualitative Exploration of the COVID-19 Pandemic’s Impact on People Experiencing Homelessness With a History of Injection Drug Use in Baltimore, Maryland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1