Victims of Political Choice

IF 0.2 Q2 HISTORY East Central Europe Pub Date : 2020-04-11 DOI:10.30965/18763308-04701007
Sobiesław Szybkowski
{"title":"Victims of Political Choice","authors":"Sobiesław Szybkowski","doi":"10.30965/18763308-04701007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The political history of the small territory of Dobrzyń Land became much more complex at the beginning of Władysław Jagiełło’s rule (1386–1434). Władysław of Opole pledged part of Dobrzyń Land (the castle of Złotoria, 1391) to the Teutonic Knights. Then in 1392, after a short war against the king of Poland, Władysław of Opole pawned the entirety of Dobrzyń Land to the Teutonic knights. Neither King Władysław Jagiełło nor the Polish political elite recognized the legality of the pledge. However, the rule of the Teutonic Knights in Dobrzyń Land led to the polarization of political attitudes among the local noblemen. A faction of local noble elites, the so-called Teutonic party, accepted the rule of the Order and collaborated eagerly with the temporary rulers of the land. Another faction, the so-called the royal party, did not agree to the rule of the Order and chose to emigrate to territories ruled directly by Władysław Jagiełło. Their domains in Dobrzyń Land were confiscated by the Order. The Polish king in response gave them temporary possessions within the territory of the kingdom. The situation reversed in 1405 when Dobrzyń Land was redeemed by Władysław Jagiełło. As a consequence, the refugees returned and redeemed land confiscated by the Order. Repression in turn by the Polish ruler induced some of the Teutonic party to seek the protection of the Order in Prussia. A few years later, as a result of the Polish-Lithuanian–Teutonic war (1409–1411), Dobrzyń Land was again occupied by the Teutonic Knights. Once more, some of the nobles fled from their homeland to territories unoccupied by the Teutonic Knights, while some of the Teutonic party returned to Dobrzyń Land. In the end, as a result of the Teutonic Knights’s defeat at the Battle of Grunwald (1410) and decisions of the First Peace of Toruń (1411), Dobrzyń Land came again under the long-term rule of Polish kings. That meant the return of refugees from the royal party and again forced the Teutonic Knights’ supporters to go into exile. In the end, some of the latter reconciled with the Polish king and came back to their homeland. Some, however, remained in the Teutonic State, where they were given domains.","PeriodicalId":40651,"journal":{"name":"East Central Europe","volume":"47 1","pages":"89-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East Central Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30965/18763308-04701007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The political history of the small territory of Dobrzyń Land became much more complex at the beginning of Władysław Jagiełło’s rule (1386–1434). Władysław of Opole pledged part of Dobrzyń Land (the castle of Złotoria, 1391) to the Teutonic Knights. Then in 1392, after a short war against the king of Poland, Władysław of Opole pawned the entirety of Dobrzyń Land to the Teutonic knights. Neither King Władysław Jagiełło nor the Polish political elite recognized the legality of the pledge. However, the rule of the Teutonic Knights in Dobrzyń Land led to the polarization of political attitudes among the local noblemen. A faction of local noble elites, the so-called Teutonic party, accepted the rule of the Order and collaborated eagerly with the temporary rulers of the land. Another faction, the so-called the royal party, did not agree to the rule of the Order and chose to emigrate to territories ruled directly by Władysław Jagiełło. Their domains in Dobrzyń Land were confiscated by the Order. The Polish king in response gave them temporary possessions within the territory of the kingdom. The situation reversed in 1405 when Dobrzyń Land was redeemed by Władysław Jagiełło. As a consequence, the refugees returned and redeemed land confiscated by the Order. Repression in turn by the Polish ruler induced some of the Teutonic party to seek the protection of the Order in Prussia. A few years later, as a result of the Polish-Lithuanian–Teutonic war (1409–1411), Dobrzyń Land was again occupied by the Teutonic Knights. Once more, some of the nobles fled from their homeland to territories unoccupied by the Teutonic Knights, while some of the Teutonic party returned to Dobrzyń Land. In the end, as a result of the Teutonic Knights’s defeat at the Battle of Grunwald (1410) and decisions of the First Peace of Toruń (1411), Dobrzyń Land came again under the long-term rule of Polish kings. That meant the return of refugees from the royal party and again forced the Teutonic Knights’ supporters to go into exile. In the end, some of the latter reconciled with the Polish king and came back to their homeland. Some, however, remained in the Teutonic State, where they were given domains.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政治选择的受害者
在瓦迪斯瓦夫·贾吉沃统治初期(1386-1434),多布日兰这片小领土的政治历史变得更加复杂。奥波莱的瓦迪斯瓦夫向条顿骑士团承诺将多布日恩地(1391年,Złotoria城堡)的一部分交给条顿骑士。1392年,在与波兰国王进行了一场短暂的战争后,奥波莱的瓦迪斯瓦夫将整个多布津地区典当给了条顿骑士。瓦迪斯瓦夫·贾吉沃国王和波兰政治精英都不承认这一承诺的合法性。然而,条顿骑士团在多布日兰的统治导致了当地贵族政治态度的两极分化。一个由当地贵族精英组成的派系,即所谓的条顿党,接受了骑士团的统治,并热切地与该国的临时统治者合作。另一个派别,即所谓的皇家党,不同意骑士团的统治,并选择移民到瓦迪斯瓦夫·贾吉沃直接统治的领土。骑士团没收了他们在多布日兰的领地。作为回应,波兰国王给了他们在王国领土内的临时财产。1405年,多布日兰被瓦迪斯瓦夫·贾吉沃赎回,情况发生了逆转。因此,难民返回并赎回了骑士团没收的土地。波兰统治者的镇压反过来促使条顿党的一些人寻求普鲁士骑士团的保护。几年后,由于波兰-立陶宛-条顿战争(1409–1411),多布津再次被条顿骑士团占领。又一次,一些贵族从他们的祖国逃到了条顿骑士团未占领的领土,而条顿党的一些人则回到了多布津。最终,由于条顿骑士团在格伦瓦尔德战役(1410年)中的失败和托伦第一次和平(1411年)的决定,多布津再次受到波兰国王的长期统治。这意味着来自皇室的难民返回,并再次迫使条顿骑士团的支持者流亡海外。最后,后者中的一些人与波兰国王和解,回到了自己的祖国。然而,有些人仍然留在条顿州,在那里他们被授予了领地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Liberation, Resettlement, and Looting in Postwar Memoirs from Poland Unmaking Détente: Yugoslavia, the United States, and the Global Cold War, 1968–1980, written by Lazic, Milorad The Postsocialist Contemporary: The Institutionalization of Artistic Practice in Eastern Europe after 1989, written by Octavian, Esanu Empty Signs, Historical Imaginaries: The Entangled Nationalization of Names and Naming in a Late Habsburg Borderland, written by Ágoston, Berecz List of Peer-Reviewers of Volume 47 (2020)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1