Ryan Helcoski, A. Tepley, Jennifer C. Mcgarvey, E. Gonzalez-Akre, V. Meakem, Jonathan R. Thompson, K. Anderson‐Teixeira
{"title":"NO SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN TREE MORTALITY FOLLOWING CORING IN A TEMPERATE HARDWOOD FOREST","authors":"Ryan Helcoski, A. Tepley, Jennifer C. Mcgarvey, E. Gonzalez-Akre, V. Meakem, Jonathan R. Thompson, K. Anderson‐Teixeira","doi":"10.3959/1536-1098-75.1.67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The collection of tree-ring data from living trees is widespread and highly valuable in ecological and dendro-climatological research, yet there is concern that coring injures trees, potentially contributing to mortality. Unlike resinous conifers that can quickly compartmentalize wounds, less decay-resistant angiosperms may face more pronounced risk of injury from coring. To test if coring increases mortality rates in temperate hardwood trees, we leverage a unique dataset tracking the mortality of cored and uncored hardwood trees representing 19 species from 10 genera in a 26-ha plot in Virginia, USA. We compare mortality rates between 935 cored trees and 8605 uncored trees for seven years following coring. Annual mortality rates did not differ between cored trees (1.71% yr–1; 95% CI 1.40 to 2.20) and uncored trees (1.85% yr–1; 95% CI 1.70 to 2.28) across the full dataset, nor were there differences by genus or size class. These results indicate that the risk of hardwood mortality caused by increment coring is probably lower than previously assumed. However, these results cannot rule out the possibility that coring elevates hardwood mortality in other climates or when trees face multiple additional stressors that were not influential over the course of our study.","PeriodicalId":54416,"journal":{"name":"Tree-Ring Research","volume":"75 1","pages":"67 - 72"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tree-Ring Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3959/1536-1098-75.1.67","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
ABSTRACT The collection of tree-ring data from living trees is widespread and highly valuable in ecological and dendro-climatological research, yet there is concern that coring injures trees, potentially contributing to mortality. Unlike resinous conifers that can quickly compartmentalize wounds, less decay-resistant angiosperms may face more pronounced risk of injury from coring. To test if coring increases mortality rates in temperate hardwood trees, we leverage a unique dataset tracking the mortality of cored and uncored hardwood trees representing 19 species from 10 genera in a 26-ha plot in Virginia, USA. We compare mortality rates between 935 cored trees and 8605 uncored trees for seven years following coring. Annual mortality rates did not differ between cored trees (1.71% yr–1; 95% CI 1.40 to 2.20) and uncored trees (1.85% yr–1; 95% CI 1.70 to 2.28) across the full dataset, nor were there differences by genus or size class. These results indicate that the risk of hardwood mortality caused by increment coring is probably lower than previously assumed. However, these results cannot rule out the possibility that coring elevates hardwood mortality in other climates or when trees face multiple additional stressors that were not influential over the course of our study.
活树年轮数据的收集在生态学和树木气候学研究中非常广泛和有价值,但人们担心取心会伤害树木,可能导致死亡。不像树脂针叶树,可以迅速分隔伤口,较不耐腐的被子植物可能面临更大的风险,从心脏受伤。为了测试取样是否会增加温带阔叶树的死亡率,我们利用了一个独特的数据集,跟踪了美国弗吉尼亚州26公顷地块中10属19种的取样和未取样阔叶树的死亡率。我们比较了935棵有芯树和8605棵没有芯树在取芯后7年内的死亡率。有芯树的年死亡率无显著差异(1.71% - 1;95% CI 1.40 - 2.20)和未覆盖树木(1.85%,年- 1;95% CI 1.70至2.28),在整个数据集中也没有属或大小类的差异。这些结果表明,增量取心导致硬木死亡的风险可能比先前假设的要低。然而,这些结果不能排除在其他气候条件下,或者当树木面临多个额外的压力时,这些压力在我们的研究过程中没有影响时,取芯会提高硬木死亡率的可能性。
期刊介绍:
Tree-Ring Research (TRR) is devoted to papers dealing with the growth rings of trees and the applications of tree-ring research in a wide variety of fields, including but not limited to archaeology, geology, ecology, hydrology, climatology, forestry, and botany. Papers involving research results, new techniques of data acquisition or analysis, and regional or subject-oriented reviews or syntheses are considered for publication.
Scientific papers usually fall into two main categories. Articles should not exceed 5000 words, or approximately 20 double-spaced typewritten pages, including tables, references, and an abstract of 200 words or fewer. All manuscripts submitted as Articles are reviewed by at least two referees. Research Reports, which are usually reviewed by at least one outside referee, should not exceed 1500 words or include more than two figures. Research Reports address technical developments, describe well-documented but preliminary research results, or present findings for which the Article format is not appropriate. Book or monograph Reviews of 500 words or less are also considered. Other categories of papers are occasionally published. All papers are published only in English. Abstracts of the Articles or Reports may be printed in other languages if supplied by the author(s) with English translations.