Teaching a culture of care: Why it matters

Q3 Social Sciences Revista de Bioetica y Derecho Pub Date : 2021-02-17 DOI:10.1344/RBD2021.51.31130
J. Tremoleda, A. Kerton
{"title":"Teaching a culture of care: Why it matters","authors":"J. Tremoleda, A. Kerton","doi":"10.1344/RBD2021.51.31130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of animal in biomedical research remains a critical compromise. Research and higher education institutions play a major role in educating on the use of animal and such training is expected to translate into the development of a culture of care practice across all staff working with animals. But nurturing a “culture of care” and impacting in professional attitudes in the field of animal research remains challenging due to its social, ethical and different institutional frameworks. From an educational perspective, current practice remains challenged by the need for better integration of inter-cultural perceptions on animal welfare, supported by more cross disciplinary integration in educational curriculum including the relevance of the 3Rs principles and promoting reflective practice strategies.  Institutional support is crucial to provide a safe, and supportive framework to promote such caring ethos. Our aim is to discuss practical actions to implement and assess culture of care, highlighting its direct impact on the professional integrity of staff which is directly linked to research and education excellence. Seeking a global welfare for all the beings involved and supporting individual and team reflective practice will provide better tools to guarantee the best care of the animals.","PeriodicalId":52269,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Bioetica y Derecho","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Bioetica y Derecho","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1344/RBD2021.51.31130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of animal in biomedical research remains a critical compromise. Research and higher education institutions play a major role in educating on the use of animal and such training is expected to translate into the development of a culture of care practice across all staff working with animals. But nurturing a “culture of care” and impacting in professional attitudes in the field of animal research remains challenging due to its social, ethical and different institutional frameworks. From an educational perspective, current practice remains challenged by the need for better integration of inter-cultural perceptions on animal welfare, supported by more cross disciplinary integration in educational curriculum including the relevance of the 3Rs principles and promoting reflective practice strategies.  Institutional support is crucial to provide a safe, and supportive framework to promote such caring ethos. Our aim is to discuss practical actions to implement and assess culture of care, highlighting its direct impact on the professional integrity of staff which is directly linked to research and education excellence. Seeking a global welfare for all the beings involved and supporting individual and team reflective practice will provide better tools to guarantee the best care of the animals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
培养关怀文化:为什么它很重要
在生物医学研究中使用动物仍然是一个关键的妥协。研究机构和高等教育机构在动物利用教育方面发挥着重要作用,预计这种培训将转化为所有与动物打交道的工作人员的护理实践文化的发展。但是,由于其社会、伦理和不同的制度框架,培育一种“关怀文化”并影响动物研究领域的专业态度仍然具有挑战性。从教育的角度来看,目前的实践仍然面临挑战,需要更好地整合跨文化对动物福利的看法,并得到教育课程中更多跨学科整合的支持,包括3r原则的相关性和促进反思实践策略。机构的支持对于提供一个安全和支持性的框架来促进这种关怀精神至关重要。我们的目的是讨论实施和评估关怀文化的实际行动,强调其对员工职业诚信的直接影响,这与卓越的研究和教育直接相关。为所有相关生物寻求全球福利,支持个人和团队的反思实践,将提供更好的工具来保证对动物的最佳照顾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de Bioetica y Derecho
Revista de Bioetica y Derecho Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Accreditation of research ethics committees in Paraguay: An ethical imperative. Una mirada bioética a la representación social de la discapacidad psicosocial Inteligencia artificial y administración de justicia: desafíos derivados del contexto latinoamericano Derechos y deberes de información: el rol de la atención primaria de salud en la implementación de la ley que despenaliza la interrupción voluntaria del embarazo en tres causales en Chile Bioética en contextos pluriculturales: problemas epistemológicos y su relación con los derechos humanos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1