Sociality, Seriousness, and Cynicism

IF 0.3 0 PHILOSOPHY Sartre Studies International Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.3167/ssi.2020.260106
J. Webber
{"title":"Sociality, Seriousness, and Cynicism","authors":"J. Webber","doi":"10.3167/ssi.2020.260106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is a clarification and development of my interpretation of Sartre’s theory of bad faith in response to Ronald Santoni’s sophisticated critique, published in this issue. It begins by clarifying Sartre’s conception of a project and explaining his claim that one project is fundamental, thereby elucidating the idea that bad faith is a fundamental project. This forms the groundwork of my responses to Santoni’s critique of my interpretation, which comprises four arguments: Sartre does not consider us to be ontologically and congenitally disposed to bad faith; Santoni is right that social pressure cannot explain the prevalence of bad faith, but this is a problem with Sartre’s theory rather than a problem for my interpretation of it; Sartre’s conception of seriousness is merely an optional strategy of bad faith; and Sartre is right to deny that bad faith is an inherently cynical project.","PeriodicalId":41680,"journal":{"name":"Sartre Studies International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sartre Studies International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/ssi.2020.260106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is a clarification and development of my interpretation of Sartre’s theory of bad faith in response to Ronald Santoni’s sophisticated critique, published in this issue. It begins by clarifying Sartre’s conception of a project and explaining his claim that one project is fundamental, thereby elucidating the idea that bad faith is a fundamental project. This forms the groundwork of my responses to Santoni’s critique of my interpretation, which comprises four arguments: Sartre does not consider us to be ontologically and congenitally disposed to bad faith; Santoni is right that social pressure cannot explain the prevalence of bad faith, but this is a problem with Sartre’s theory rather than a problem for my interpretation of it; Sartre’s conception of seriousness is merely an optional strategy of bad faith; and Sartre is right to deny that bad faith is an inherently cynical project.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会性、严肃性和犬儒主义
这篇文章是我对萨特恶意理论的解释的澄清和发展,以回应罗纳德·桑托尼在本期发表的复杂批评。它首先阐明了萨特对一个项目的概念,并解释了他关于一个项目是根本的主张,从而阐明了恶意是根本项目的观点。这构成了我对桑托尼对我的解释的批评的回应的基础,该批评包括四个论点:萨特并不认为我们在本体论上天生就有恶意;桑托尼说得对,社会压力无法解释恶意的普遍性,但这是萨特理论的问题,而不是我对它的解释的问题;萨特的严肃观念只是一种可选的恶意策略;萨特否认恶意本质上是一个愤世嫉俗的项目,这是正确的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Tortured Freedom Philosophical Fiction as World Literature Towards a Phenomenology of Reflective Identification Jazz Improvisation and Creolizing Phenomenology Self-Consciousness and Self-Knowledge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1