Organizational readiness for restorative justice to address campus sexual harm: ‘The messy world of creation’

Q2 Social Sciences Contemporary Justice Review Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI:10.1080/10282580.2021.1995718
C. Burke
{"title":"Organizational readiness for restorative justice to address campus sexual harm: ‘The messy world of creation’","authors":"C. Burke","doi":"10.1080/10282580.2021.1995718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Recent scholarly attention has focused on the possibilities of using restorative justice to address campus sexual harm. Scholars and advocates have noted gaps in current responses to campus sexual harm, highlighting restorative justice as an additional approach to better address the needs of survivors and more fully achieve accountability. Organizational change scholarship suggests engaging key stakeholders to examine the readiness of an institution to embrace change. One notable gap in the literature is the application of an organizational readiness framework in the context of restorative justice to address campus sexual harm. Through two phases of interviews with a total of five participants, this exploratory study fills that gap by identifying markers of readiness for restorative justice to address campus sexual harm and applying those markers to gauge one university’s readiness for restorative justice. This study identifies philosophical, practical, and external considerations relevant to readiness for restorative justice. This research also notes markers in need of further development at one university, discussing ways that those markers of readiness can be improved, as well as directions for future research.","PeriodicalId":10583,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Justice Review","volume":"24 1","pages":"457 - 482"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Justice Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2021.1995718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Recent scholarly attention has focused on the possibilities of using restorative justice to address campus sexual harm. Scholars and advocates have noted gaps in current responses to campus sexual harm, highlighting restorative justice as an additional approach to better address the needs of survivors and more fully achieve accountability. Organizational change scholarship suggests engaging key stakeholders to examine the readiness of an institution to embrace change. One notable gap in the literature is the application of an organizational readiness framework in the context of restorative justice to address campus sexual harm. Through two phases of interviews with a total of five participants, this exploratory study fills that gap by identifying markers of readiness for restorative justice to address campus sexual harm and applying those markers to gauge one university’s readiness for restorative justice. This study identifies philosophical, practical, and external considerations relevant to readiness for restorative justice. This research also notes markers in need of further development at one university, discussing ways that those markers of readiness can be improved, as well as directions for future research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织准备好恢复性司法来解决校园性伤害:“混乱的创造世界”
摘要最近学术界关注的焦点是利用恢复性司法解决校园性伤害的可能性。学者和倡导者注意到目前应对校园性伤害的措施存在差距,强调恢复性司法是更好地满足幸存者需求和更充分地实现问责制的一种额外方法。组织变革奖学金建议让关键利益相关者参与进来,检查一个机构是否准备好接受变革。文献中的一个显著空白是在恢复性司法的背景下应用组织准备框架来解决校园性伤害问题。通过对总共五名参与者的两个阶段的访谈,这项探索性研究填补了这一空白,确定了恢复性司法解决校园性伤害的准备程度标志,并将这些标志应用于衡量一所大学恢复性司法的准备程度。本研究确定了与恢复性司法准备工作相关的哲学、实践和外部考虑因素。这项研究还指出了一所大学需要进一步开发的标记,讨论了如何改进这些准备就绪标记,以及未来研究的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Justice Review
Contemporary Justice Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Cultivating just campus communities: engaging university students in developing restorative justice alternatives Defining restorative justice: a perspective from England and Wales’s further education sector The agricultural prison industry: a scoping review The international criminal court and responsibility for mass atrocities: can JCE enhance capacity to hold masterminds accountable? Restorative justice for adult offenders in South Australia: judicial perspectives and insights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1