Can the components of green intellectual capital influence employee green behavior? An empirical analysis on Indian energy sector using the partial least squares method

IF 6.2 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Intellectual Capital Pub Date : 2022-03-08 DOI:10.1108/jic-10-2021-0284
Arpita Ghosh, S. Haque
{"title":"Can the components of green intellectual capital influence employee green behavior? An empirical analysis on Indian energy sector using the partial least squares method","authors":"Arpita Ghosh, S. Haque","doi":"10.1108/jic-10-2021-0284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe study aims to explore the relationship between the dimensions of green intellectual capital (GIC) and employee green behavior (EGB).Design/methodology/approachA survey has been conducted among a random representative population of employees working for the energy-sector organizations in India to collect data for this study. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) for GIC supports the inclusion of the new dimension in its construct. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) validates the measurement model. Hypothesized relationships have been examined by applying structural equation modeling using partial least squares method.FindingsResults corroborate that all the four dimensions of GIC have varying degrees of significant positive impact on EGB. The study contributes to the existing literature by extending the understanding of the concept of GIC and its connection with EGB using natural-resource based theory and social cognitive theory (SCT).Originality/valueThe study has empirically examined the relationship between GIC and EGB in the context of a developing country like India. Moreover, unlike the existing literature that have classified GIC into green human capital (GHC), green structural capital (GSC) and green relational capital (GRC), the study identifies green spiritual capital (GSpC) as another important dimension of GIC which is an intangible asset and highly relevant in influencing altruistic activities like green behavior. The study presents significant implications for managers and policy-makers for ensuring EGB by investing in GIC resources.","PeriodicalId":48191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Capital","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Capital","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jic-10-2021-0284","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

PurposeThe study aims to explore the relationship between the dimensions of green intellectual capital (GIC) and employee green behavior (EGB).Design/methodology/approachA survey has been conducted among a random representative population of employees working for the energy-sector organizations in India to collect data for this study. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) for GIC supports the inclusion of the new dimension in its construct. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) validates the measurement model. Hypothesized relationships have been examined by applying structural equation modeling using partial least squares method.FindingsResults corroborate that all the four dimensions of GIC have varying degrees of significant positive impact on EGB. The study contributes to the existing literature by extending the understanding of the concept of GIC and its connection with EGB using natural-resource based theory and social cognitive theory (SCT).Originality/valueThe study has empirically examined the relationship between GIC and EGB in the context of a developing country like India. Moreover, unlike the existing literature that have classified GIC into green human capital (GHC), green structural capital (GSC) and green relational capital (GRC), the study identifies green spiritual capital (GSpC) as another important dimension of GIC which is an intangible asset and highly relevant in influencing altruistic activities like green behavior. The study presents significant implications for managers and policy-makers for ensuring EGB by investing in GIC resources.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绿色智力资本的构成要素是否会影响员工的绿色行为?用偏最小二乘法对印度能源部门进行实证分析
目的探讨绿色智力资本(GIC)维度与员工绿色行为(EGB)的关系。设计/方法/方法在印度能源部门组织的随机代表性员工群体中进行了一项调查,以收集本研究的数据。探索性因子分析(EFA)的GIC支持在其结构中包含新的维度。验证性因子分析(CFA)验证了测量模型。采用偏最小二乘法的结构方程模型对假设关系进行了检验。研究结果证实,GIC的所有四个维度对EGB都有不同程度的显著正向影响。本研究运用自然资源基础理论和社会认知理论(SCT)拓展了对GIC概念及其与EGB关系的理解,对现有文献有所贡献。本研究以印度等发展中国家为背景,实证考察了GIC与EGB之间的关系。此外,与现有文献将GIC分为绿色人力资本(GHC)、绿色结构资本(GSC)和绿色关系资本(GRC)不同,本研究将绿色精神资本(GSpC)确定为GIC的另一个重要维度,它是一种无形资产,与影响绿色行为等利他行为高度相关。该研究为管理者和决策者通过投资政府投资资源来确保EGB提供了重要的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intellectual Capital is a peer-reviewed international publication dedicated to the exchange of the latest research and best practice information on all aspects of creating, identifying, managing and measuring intellectual capital in organisations. The journal publishes original research and case studies by academic, business and public sector contributors on intellectual capital strategies, approaches, frameworks, tools, techniques and technologies in order to increase the understanding of intellectual capital within the context of the modern knowledge economy. The focus of this journal is on the identification of innovative intellectual capital strategies and the application of theoretical concepts to real-world situations.
期刊最新文献
Do employees with high human capital hide knowledge? Exploring mediation and moderation mechanisms Human–artificial intellectual capital…beyond a fragmented perspective The role of intellectual capital on zakat performance: insight from Indonesia How entrepreneurs engage with feedback during value creation – a taxonomy Using firm-level intellectual capital to achieve strategic sustainability: examination of phenomenon of business failure in terms of the critical events
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1