1950 India–Nepal Treaty of Peace and Friendship and Regional Mobilisations in Eastern India

Samir Sharma
{"title":"1950 India–Nepal Treaty of Peace and Friendship and Regional Mobilisations in Eastern India","authors":"Samir Sharma","doi":"10.1177/09749284221147180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regional demands for statehood in India have had an aspiration towards a ‘nationalisation’ of their issues in the hopes of accommodation. In the case of the Gorkhaland movement for separate statehood in northern West Bengal, the competition among regional forces to occupy and share a ‘national political space’ from the ‘margins’ has fuelled the increasing employment of debates regarding international treaty obligations. While there are numerous factors that are the causes of regional political mobilisation, the demand for the abrogation of Article VII of the India–Nepal Treaty of Peace and Friendship (1950) has nevertheless remained as one of its central themes. This symbolises an accentuation in the anxieties of citizenship and belonging to the nation. Examining these amid the important issues relating to unsuccessful invocations from Nepal for a Brihat Nepal (Greater Nepal), and the constitution of the Eminent Persons Group (EPG) for India–Nepal relations, the article concludes that there will not be any radical change in the status quo of India’s international treaty obligations with Nepal despite repeated demands by regional actors in India. This is indicated in an elusive ‘permanent political solution’ declared by the ruling party in India as a response to the regional political mobilisation that will possibly depart from the debates that invoke and demand transformations to India’s treaty obligations with Nepal.","PeriodicalId":81509,"journal":{"name":"India quarterly","volume":"79 1","pages":"79 - 92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"India quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09749284221147180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Regional demands for statehood in India have had an aspiration towards a ‘nationalisation’ of their issues in the hopes of accommodation. In the case of the Gorkhaland movement for separate statehood in northern West Bengal, the competition among regional forces to occupy and share a ‘national political space’ from the ‘margins’ has fuelled the increasing employment of debates regarding international treaty obligations. While there are numerous factors that are the causes of regional political mobilisation, the demand for the abrogation of Article VII of the India–Nepal Treaty of Peace and Friendship (1950) has nevertheless remained as one of its central themes. This symbolises an accentuation in the anxieties of citizenship and belonging to the nation. Examining these amid the important issues relating to unsuccessful invocations from Nepal for a Brihat Nepal (Greater Nepal), and the constitution of the Eminent Persons Group (EPG) for India–Nepal relations, the article concludes that there will not be any radical change in the status quo of India’s international treaty obligations with Nepal despite repeated demands by regional actors in India. This is indicated in an elusive ‘permanent political solution’ declared by the ruling party in India as a response to the regional political mobilisation that will possibly depart from the debates that invoke and demand transformations to India’s treaty obligations with Nepal.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1950年印度-尼泊尔和平友好条约和东印度地区动员
印度地区对国家地位的要求一直渴望将其问题“国有化”,以期达成和解。就西孟加拉邦北部争取独立国家的廓尔喀兰运动而言,地区力量之间从“边缘”占据和共享“国家政治空间”的竞争推动了关于国际条约义务的辩论越来越多。尽管有许多因素是地区政治动员的原因,但要求废除《印度-尼泊尔和平友好条约》(1950年)第七条仍然是其核心主题之一。这象征着对公民身份和国家归属感的焦虑加剧。在与尼泊尔请求贿赂尼泊尔(大尼泊尔)和印度-尼泊尔关系知名人士小组(EPG)章程有关的重要问题中审查这些问题,文章的结论是,尽管印度的地区行为者一再提出要求,但印度与尼泊尔的国际条约义务现状不会发生任何根本性变化。印度执政党宣布了一个难以捉摸的“永久政治解决方案”,作为对地区政治动员的回应,这一点可能会偏离援引和要求改变印度与尼泊尔条约义务的辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Visa-on-arrival, ECOWAS-free Mobility and the Securitisation of the Intra-African Migration in Nigeria Book review: Mustafa Suleyman and Michael Bhaskar, The Coming Wave: AI, Power and the Twenty-first Century’s Greatest Dilemma Navigating East: Exploring Northeast India’s Perspective on the Look (Act) East Policy Golden Triangle Amphetamines in India: The Indo-Bangladesh Border as an Alternative to the North-East Corridor Book review: Suranjan Das and Anita Sengupta (Eds.), Contiguity, Connectivity and Access: The Importance of the Bay of Bengal Region in Indian Foreign Policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1