Caring in the Gig Economy: A Relational Perspective of Decent Work

IF 3.8 3区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS Work Employment and Society Pub Date : 2023-05-25 DOI:10.1177/09500170231173586
M. Khan, Jannine Williams, Penny Williams, Robyn Mayes
{"title":"Caring in the Gig Economy: A Relational Perspective of Decent Work","authors":"M. Khan, Jannine Williams, Penny Williams, Robyn Mayes","doi":"10.1177/09500170231173586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rapidly expanding gig economy has been criticized for creating precarious and indecent working conditions. These critiques draw on decent work debates centred on employment classification, regulation and platform fairness, with less focus on the interactions between workers, platforms and clients, which are central to the experience of platform-mediated work. This article adopts a worker-centric relational perspective to explore decent work in the gig economy. Drawing on the experiences of workers in platform-mediated domestic care work, the insights from this study highlight the importance of social interactions and relationships, using an ethics of care lens, to elucidate how relational aspects shape workers’ experiences. The findings reveal platform workers centre mutuality of interests, responsiveness and reciprocity, attentiveness and solidarity to maintain a balance of care (care-for-self and care-for-others) when negotiating platform-mediated care work. This article contributes relationality as a key dimension of decent work currently overlooked in studies exploring gig work arrangements.","PeriodicalId":48187,"journal":{"name":"Work Employment and Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work Employment and Society","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170231173586","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapidly expanding gig economy has been criticized for creating precarious and indecent working conditions. These critiques draw on decent work debates centred on employment classification, regulation and platform fairness, with less focus on the interactions between workers, platforms and clients, which are central to the experience of platform-mediated work. This article adopts a worker-centric relational perspective to explore decent work in the gig economy. Drawing on the experiences of workers in platform-mediated domestic care work, the insights from this study highlight the importance of social interactions and relationships, using an ethics of care lens, to elucidate how relational aspects shape workers’ experiences. The findings reveal platform workers centre mutuality of interests, responsiveness and reciprocity, attentiveness and solidarity to maintain a balance of care (care-for-self and care-for-others) when negotiating platform-mediated care work. This article contributes relationality as a key dimension of decent work currently overlooked in studies exploring gig work arrangements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关爱零工经济:体面工作的关系视角
迅速扩张的零工经济因创造不稳定和不雅的工作条件而受到批评。这些批评借鉴了以就业分类、监管和平台公平性为中心的体面工作辩论,而对工人、平台和客户之间的互动关注较少,而这些互动对平台中介工作的体验至关重要。本文采用以工人为中心的关系视角来探讨零工经济中的体面工作。利用平台中介的家庭护理工作工作者的经验,本研究的见解强调了社会互动和关系的重要性,使用护理伦理的视角,阐明了关系方面如何塑造工人的经验。研究结果表明,平台工作者在协商平台中介的护理工作时,以利益互补性、反应性和互惠性、关注性和团结性为中心,保持照顾(照顾自己和照顾他人)的平衡。这篇文章将关系作为体面工作的一个关键维度,目前在探索零工工作安排的研究中被忽视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
13.50%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Work, Employment and Society (WES) is a leading international peer reviewed journal of the British Sociological Association which publishes theoretically informed and original research on the sociology of work. Work, Employment and Society covers all aspects of work, employment and unemployment and their connections with wider social processes and social structures. The journal is sociologically orientated but welcomes contributions from other disciplines which addresses the issues in a way that informs less debated aspects of the journal"s remit, such as unpaid labour and the informal economy.
期刊最新文献
Retraction Book Review: Peter Cappelli, Our Least Important Asset: Why the Relentless Focus on Finance and Accounting is Bad for Business and Employees CappelliPeterOur Least Important Asset: Why the Relentless Focus on Finance and Accounting is Bad for Business and EmployeesOxford; New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2023, £23.99 hbk, (ISBN: 9780197629802), 240 pp. Ambivalent Inclusion: Older Workers, Diversity Agendas and the Persistence of the Ideal Worker Carol Wolkowitz remembered Fathers Combining Work and Care: Flexible Work Arrangements and Paternal Involvement Across Financial Situations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1