Towards the Pragmatic Concept of Knowledges

R. Maciag
{"title":"Towards the Pragmatic Concept of Knowledges","authors":"R. Maciag","doi":"10.37240/fin.2022.10.zs.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents and justifies the thesis that the way of understanding knowledge has changed significantly over the last century. This change consists in departing from the classic definition of knowledge formulated by Plato, and in particular in questioning the subjective role of man as the holder of knowledge and abandoning claims to the truthfulness of knowledge. This process was an intensive evolution; its elements are given and justified in the text. Its source was a deep reconstruction of the mode of creating epistemic structures in mathematics and geometry, based on the abandonment of the principle of representation. Knowledge turned out to be determined by the social context, it became dispersed, decentralized, which led to the rejection of the condition of its truthfulness. The last phase of this evolution is knowledge as a phenomenon in the area of digital technologies, in particular artificial intelligence. This evolution has led to the emergence of many variants of knowledge that act as local knowledge, which justifies the use of the plural in this case.","PeriodicalId":52830,"journal":{"name":"Filozofia i Nauka","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filozofia i Nauka","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37240/fin.2022.10.zs.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article presents and justifies the thesis that the way of understanding knowledge has changed significantly over the last century. This change consists in departing from the classic definition of knowledge formulated by Plato, and in particular in questioning the subjective role of man as the holder of knowledge and abandoning claims to the truthfulness of knowledge. This process was an intensive evolution; its elements are given and justified in the text. Its source was a deep reconstruction of the mode of creating epistemic structures in mathematics and geometry, based on the abandonment of the principle of representation. Knowledge turned out to be determined by the social context, it became dispersed, decentralized, which led to the rejection of the condition of its truthfulness. The last phase of this evolution is knowledge as a phenomenon in the area of digital technologies, in particular artificial intelligence. This evolution has led to the emergence of many variants of knowledge that act as local knowledge, which justifies the use of the plural in this case.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
试论知识的语用概念
本文提出并证明了这一论点,即理解知识的方式在上个世纪发生了重大变化。这种变化在于背离了柏拉图对知识的经典定义,尤其是质疑人作为知识持有者的主观角色,放弃了对知识真实性的主张。这一过程是一个密集的演变过程;文中给出了它的组成部分并对其进行了论证。其根源是在放弃表示原则的基础上,对数学和几何中创造认识结构的模式进行了深刻的重建。事实证明,知识是由社会背景决定的,它变得分散、分散,这导致了对其真实性条件的拒绝。这一演变的最后阶段是知识作为数字技术领域的一种现象,特别是人工智能。这种演变导致了许多作为局部知识的知识变体的出现,这证明了在这种情况下使用复数是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Main Evolutionary Ideas of Modern Biological Kowledge. An Outline of the Historical and Methodological Analysis On the Theory of Prebiotic Evolution Philosophical Fundaments of the Theory of Evolution The Organization of Living Matter and the Process of Evolution On the Biological Relation of Leaf Dye to Blood Dye The Protobiological Theory of Ceilings and Floors, or Chemical Evolution as a Planetary Process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1