Memetakan Anatomi Diskursus Islamisme dan Terorisme Islam

Ridwan Rosdiawan
{"title":"Memetakan Anatomi Diskursus Islamisme dan Terorisme Islam","authors":"Ridwan Rosdiawan","doi":"10.15642/islamica.2018.13.1.1-33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: What is the main factor of terrorism; Islamic doctrine, or political factor? There are three mainstream opinions provide theoretical reviews. Firstly, those who believe that the justification of acts of violence to terrorism is an inherent product of religious doctrine. Secondly, those who consider that terrorism is a profane matter have absolutely nothing to do with religion. Thirdly, the opinion which states that terrorism is syncretism and interrelated modification between politics and religion. This article tries to examine the three views above by dissecting other perspectives in order to get a clearer picture of the discourse of Islamism transforming into a radical movement leading to terrorism. Doctrinal and political motives are so strongly integrated and overlapping in the structure of the motives and actions of these radical groups. Departing from the view that Islamism is a movement that aims to make radical-revolutionary changes in social structure institutions, this article collects theories that can be used as maps to understand the construction of Islamism.","PeriodicalId":30844,"journal":{"name":"Islamica Jurnal Studi Keislaman","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Islamica Jurnal Studi Keislaman","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15642/islamica.2018.13.1.1-33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract: What is the main factor of terrorism; Islamic doctrine, or political factor? There are three mainstream opinions provide theoretical reviews. Firstly, those who believe that the justification of acts of violence to terrorism is an inherent product of religious doctrine. Secondly, those who consider that terrorism is a profane matter have absolutely nothing to do with religion. Thirdly, the opinion which states that terrorism is syncretism and interrelated modification between politics and religion. This article tries to examine the three views above by dissecting other perspectives in order to get a clearer picture of the discourse of Islamism transforming into a radical movement leading to terrorism. Doctrinal and political motives are so strongly integrated and overlapping in the structure of the motives and actions of these radical groups. Departing from the view that Islamism is a movement that aims to make radical-revolutionary changes in social structure institutions, this article collects theories that can be used as maps to understand the construction of Islamism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绘制伊斯兰主义和恐怖主义的解剖结构
摘要:恐怖主义的主要因素是什么?伊斯兰教义,还是政治因素?有三种主流观点提供了理论综述。首先,那些认为对恐怖主义的暴力行为的辩护是宗教教义的固有产物的人。其次,那些认为恐怖主义是亵渎的人与宗教毫无关系。第三,认为恐怖主义是政治与宗教的融合和相互关联的修正的观点。本文试图通过剖析其他观点来审视上述三种观点,以便更清楚地了解伊斯兰主义转变为导致恐怖主义的激进运动的话语。教义和政治动机在这些激进组织的动机和行动结构中是如此紧密地结合和重叠。本文从伊斯兰主义是一场旨在对社会结构制度进行激进革命变革的运动的观点出发,收集了可以作为理解伊斯兰主义建构地图的理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Institution of Islam Java: Coastal Islam, Local Culture, and the Role of Sufism The Gayo People Philosophy: Genap-Mupakat and Social Harmonization in Central Aceh From Islamism to Democracy: The Case of Rached Ghannouchi and Ennahda of Tunisia Under the Guidance of the Prophet: Charisma and Religious Authority in Contemporary Madura, Indonesia Islamic Press in Surakarta (914-1926): A Study of Medan Moeslimin and Islam Bergerak
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1