Using Numbers to Persuade: Hidden Rhetoric of Statistics

Sıdıka Başçı, Nadia Hassan
{"title":"Using Numbers to Persuade: Hidden Rhetoric of Statistics","authors":"Sıdıka Başçı, Nadia Hassan","doi":"10.33818/ier.747554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Philosophy of current knowledge distinguishes facts from values. It maintains that facts are objective, indisputable, universally verifiable and do not require to persuade. Since rhetoric is persuasion it is assumed to be deceptive and overlook reality. Therefore, statistics in its current form disregards rhetoric and emphasizes only numbers. It ignores meanings and interpretation of numbers that involve subjectivity and value judgements. In real world, numbers and values are entangled in a way that it becomes impossible to avoid subjectivity. So, it is used with an appearance of objectivity. We illustrate how apparently objective statistics conceal subjective choices. Most of real-world experiences cannot be reduced to numbers, but scientific approach compels us to measure everything. In the attempt to measure the unmeasurables like trust, intelligence and wealth etc.it is inevitable make subjective choices. There is no objective way to reduce multiple measures into one. In the field of economics values are involved even in seemingly indisputable numbers like GDP. It is value laden for the choice of factors, weights and their signs. Making comparisons on such measures without awareness have harmful implications for policy development. Moreover, it is also desirable to understand hidden values to avoid deception.","PeriodicalId":32692,"journal":{"name":"International Econometric Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Econometric Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33818/ier.747554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Philosophy of current knowledge distinguishes facts from values. It maintains that facts are objective, indisputable, universally verifiable and do not require to persuade. Since rhetoric is persuasion it is assumed to be deceptive and overlook reality. Therefore, statistics in its current form disregards rhetoric and emphasizes only numbers. It ignores meanings and interpretation of numbers that involve subjectivity and value judgements. In real world, numbers and values are entangled in a way that it becomes impossible to avoid subjectivity. So, it is used with an appearance of objectivity. We illustrate how apparently objective statistics conceal subjective choices. Most of real-world experiences cannot be reduced to numbers, but scientific approach compels us to measure everything. In the attempt to measure the unmeasurables like trust, intelligence and wealth etc.it is inevitable make subjective choices. There is no objective way to reduce multiple measures into one. In the field of economics values are involved even in seemingly indisputable numbers like GDP. It is value laden for the choice of factors, weights and their signs. Making comparisons on such measures without awareness have harmful implications for policy development. Moreover, it is also desirable to understand hidden values to avoid deception.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用数字说服:统计的隐藏修辞
当前知识的哲学将事实与价值区分开来。它认为事实是客观的,无可争辩的,普遍可验证的,不需要说服。由于修辞是说服,它被认为是欺骗性的,忽视现实。因此,目前形式的统计忽略修辞,只强调数字。它忽略了涉及主观性和价值判断的数字的意义和解释。在现实世界中,数字与价值纠缠在一起,无法避免主观性。因此,它的使用带有一种客观的表象。我们说明了明显的客观统计数据是如何隐藏主观选择的。大多数现实世界的经验不能简化为数字,但科学的方法迫使我们衡量一切。在衡量诸如信任、智力、财富等不可衡量的事物时,主观选择是不可避免的。没有客观的方法将多种措施简化为一种措施。在经济学领域,价值甚至涉及到GDP等看似无可争议的数字。因子、权重及其符号的选择承载着价值。在没有意识的情况下对这些措施进行比较会对政策制定产生有害影响。此外,了解隐藏的价值以避免欺骗也是可取的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Unveiling the Dynamics: Exploring the Relationship between Emerging Stock Market Prices and Macroeconomic Factors through ARDL Analysis A Panel Data Analysis on the Relationship between Financial Development and Economic Growth: The Case of Asian Countries Analyzing Common Market Options in the Scope of OIC Investigating the Causal Relationship between Renewable Energy Consumption and Life Expectancy in Turkey: A Toda-Yamamoto Causality Test Gibson Paradox: Panel Data Analysis on ASEAN-T Countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1