Capacity, voice and opportunity: advancing municipal engagement in Canadian federal relations

IF 0.5 Q4 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance Pub Date : 2022-12-20 DOI:10.5130/cjlg.vi27.8480
Tomas Hachard
{"title":"Capacity, voice and opportunity: advancing municipal engagement in Canadian federal relations","authors":"Tomas Hachard","doi":"10.5130/cjlg.vi27.8480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Canada, municipalities are involved in an increasing number of policy areas, but they remain largely absent from the nation’s system of intergovernmental relations. Municipal representatives do not attend First Ministers’ meetings that gather the Prime Minister and heads of each province and territory. They are also largely excluded from intergovernmental councils or committees focused on specific policy areas. Nor do they participate in the negotiation of most intergovernmental agreements. \nThis paper explores how Canada’s intergovernmental infrastructure could be reformed to include municipalities. It does so through an analysis of how other countries have made space for municipalities in their intergovernmental processes. After drawing five lessons from international experience, the paper concludes with four approaches to reforming intergovernmental relations in Canada: (1) ensure municipalities have the capacity, voice and structures to participate effectively in intergovernmental relations; (2) increase municipal involvement in provincial policy-making, including potentially through co-governed intergovernmental councils; (3) as far as possible, eliminate unfunded mandates(ie responsibilities devolved without adequate funding to discharge them) through, for example, provincial legislation or provincial–municipal intergovernmental agreements that require consultation on the fiscal impacts of draft legislation or regulation on municipalities; (4) strengthen trilateral (national/provincial/municipal) relations, including through location-specific or policy-specific agreements, and trilateral intergovernmental councils.","PeriodicalId":43511,"journal":{"name":"Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5130/cjlg.vi27.8480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Canada, municipalities are involved in an increasing number of policy areas, but they remain largely absent from the nation’s system of intergovernmental relations. Municipal representatives do not attend First Ministers’ meetings that gather the Prime Minister and heads of each province and territory. They are also largely excluded from intergovernmental councils or committees focused on specific policy areas. Nor do they participate in the negotiation of most intergovernmental agreements. This paper explores how Canada’s intergovernmental infrastructure could be reformed to include municipalities. It does so through an analysis of how other countries have made space for municipalities in their intergovernmental processes. After drawing five lessons from international experience, the paper concludes with four approaches to reforming intergovernmental relations in Canada: (1) ensure municipalities have the capacity, voice and structures to participate effectively in intergovernmental relations; (2) increase municipal involvement in provincial policy-making, including potentially through co-governed intergovernmental councils; (3) as far as possible, eliminate unfunded mandates(ie responsibilities devolved without adequate funding to discharge them) through, for example, provincial legislation or provincial–municipal intergovernmental agreements that require consultation on the fiscal impacts of draft legislation or regulation on municipalities; (4) strengthen trilateral (national/provincial/municipal) relations, including through location-specific or policy-specific agreements, and trilateral intergovernmental councils.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
能力、声音和机会:促进加拿大联邦关系中的市政参与
在加拿大,市政当局参与了越来越多的政策领域,但它们在很大程度上仍然没有出现在国家的政府间关系体系中。市政代表不参加总理和各省和地区负责人参加的第一部长会议。他们在很大程度上也被排除在专注于特定政策领域的政府间理事会或委员会之外。它们也不参加大多数政府间协定的谈判。本文探讨了如何改革加拿大的政府间基础设施,将市政当局纳入其中。它通过分析其他国家如何在政府间进程中为市政当局腾出空间来做到这一点。在吸取了国际经验的五个教训后,本文总结了加拿大政府间关系改革的四种方法:(1)确保市政当局有能力、发言权和结构有效参与政府间关系;(2) 增加市政当局对省级决策的参与,包括可能通过共同管理的政府间理事会;(3) 尽可能通过省级立法或省市政府间协议,消除没有资金支持的任务(即在没有足够资金履行职责的情况下移交的职责),这些协议要求就立法或法规草案对市政府的财政影响进行协商;(4) 加强三方(国家/省/市)关系,包括通过特定地点或特定政策的协议以及三方政府间理事会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Funding primary health care service delivery in the West Nile sub-region, Uganda The impact of New Public Management reforms on the delivery of secondary education in Tanzania An Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice to Parliament: what can Australia learn from other countries? Review: The Winding Stair by Sir Rodney Brooke How informal ties matter: encroachment on road reservations along the Kumasi–Accra highway in Ghana
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1