Optimize! Oil, Labor, and Authoritarian Neoliberalism in Kazakhstan

IF 0.5 3区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY International Labor and Working-Class History Pub Date : 2023-08-17 DOI:10.1017/S014754792300011X
Maurizio Totaro
{"title":"Optimize! Oil, Labor, and Authoritarian Neoliberalism in Kazakhstan","authors":"Maurizio Totaro","doi":"10.1017/S014754792300011X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Following the 2014–2015 oil price crisis, service companies in Kazakhstan went through a process of industrial restructuring centered on workforce reduction and a concomitant increase of labor outsourcing. Taking the restructuring – or “optimization” – of state-owned service companies in the region of Mangystau as a starting point, this paper illustrates the heterogenous precarization effects and forms of precarity catalyzed by the process. Taking a multidimensional approach, the paper describes and analyses the effects of precarization in both socio-economic and political terms, as well as the implications for the production of differentiated laboring subjectivities. It situates the ethnographic trajectories of workers within the framework of Kazakhstan's authoritarian neoliberalism, highlighting the punitive and pastoral techniques of goverment deployed in the restructuring of the regional oil complex. In the first part, the article describes how precarization was experienced by workers as “slavery”, entailing the loss of social recognition as well as the intensification of economic exploitation and political domination, heightening their exposure to social and bodily vulnerability. The second section looks instead at the workings of a governmental agency in its effort to remake redundant workers into small business owners through the acquisition of entrepreneurial skills and the abandonment of the Soviet “dependency mindset”. The third and last section of the article concentrates on the individual trajectory of a dismissed worker joining a multi-level marketing scheme in order to cleanse himself from the bodily and social toxicity of precarized work in the oil industry.","PeriodicalId":14353,"journal":{"name":"International Labor and Working-Class History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Labor and Working-Class History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S014754792300011X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Following the 2014–2015 oil price crisis, service companies in Kazakhstan went through a process of industrial restructuring centered on workforce reduction and a concomitant increase of labor outsourcing. Taking the restructuring – or “optimization” – of state-owned service companies in the region of Mangystau as a starting point, this paper illustrates the heterogenous precarization effects and forms of precarity catalyzed by the process. Taking a multidimensional approach, the paper describes and analyses the effects of precarization in both socio-economic and political terms, as well as the implications for the production of differentiated laboring subjectivities. It situates the ethnographic trajectories of workers within the framework of Kazakhstan's authoritarian neoliberalism, highlighting the punitive and pastoral techniques of goverment deployed in the restructuring of the regional oil complex. In the first part, the article describes how precarization was experienced by workers as “slavery”, entailing the loss of social recognition as well as the intensification of economic exploitation and political domination, heightening their exposure to social and bodily vulnerability. The second section looks instead at the workings of a governmental agency in its effort to remake redundant workers into small business owners through the acquisition of entrepreneurial skills and the abandonment of the Soviet “dependency mindset”. The third and last section of the article concentrates on the individual trajectory of a dismissed worker joining a multi-level marketing scheme in order to cleanse himself from the bodily and social toxicity of precarized work in the oil industry.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化哈萨克斯坦的石油、劳工和威权主义新自由主义
摘要2014-2015年油价危机后,哈萨克斯坦的服务公司经历了以劳动力减少和随之而来的劳动力外包增加为中心的产业重组过程。本文以曼格斯套地区国有服务公司的重组或“优化”为出发点,阐述了该过程所催化的异质性不稳定效应和不稳定形式。本文采用多层面的方法,从社会经济和政治角度描述和分析了不稳定的影响,以及对产生差异化劳动主体性的影响。它将工人的民族志轨迹置于哈萨克斯坦独裁新自由主义的框架内,强调了在地区石油综合体重组中部署的惩罚性和田园式政府技术。在第一部分中,文章描述了工人如何将不稳定视为“奴隶”,导致社会认可的丧失,以及经济剥削和政治统治的加剧,加剧了他们在社会和身体上的脆弱性。第二部分着眼于一个政府机构的运作,通过获得创业技能和放弃苏联的“依赖心态”,将多余的工人改造成小企业主。文章的第三节也是最后一节集中讲述了一名被解雇的工人加入多层次营销计划的个人轨迹,以使自己免受石油行业预制工作对身体和社会的毒害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: ILWCH has an international reputation for scholarly innovation and quality. It explores diverse topics from globalisation and workers’ rights to class and consumption, labour movements, class identities and cultures, unions, and working-class politics. ILWCH publishes original research, review essays, conference reports from around the world, and an acclaimed scholarly controversy section. Comparative and cross-disciplinary, the journal is of interest to scholars in history, sociology, political science, labor studies, global studies, and a wide range of other fields and disciplines. Published for International Labor and Working-Class History, Inc.
期刊最新文献
The Worlds of Labor in Ghana’s Gold Mining Industry, c. 1895–1957 Pacifying the Battlefield of Industry: Warfare and Social Rights in 1848 France Gender and Deindustrialization: A Transnational Historiographical Review Japan’s Forgotten Korean Forced Laborers: The Search for Hidden Wartime Graves in Hokkaido Team–Work: The Olympics 1925 and 1931
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1