A Clinical Audit and Impact of Interventions on Antibiotic Prescribing Practices at a Public Dental Primary Care Clinic

IF 0.1 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Archives of Orofacial Science Pub Date : 2022-06-23 DOI:10.21315/aos2022.1701.oa01
Sarah Wan-Lin Lim, Diana Brennai Awan, T. H. Maling
{"title":"A Clinical Audit and Impact of Interventions on Antibiotic Prescribing Practices at a Public Dental Primary Care Clinic","authors":"Sarah Wan-Lin Lim, Diana Brennai Awan, T. H. Maling","doi":"10.21315/aos2022.1701.oa01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in dentistry has been widely reported but local studies are scarce. We aimed to evaluate antibiotic prescribing practices among dental officers in a public dental primary care clinic against current guidelines: specifically assessing the number, appropriateness, accuracy of prescriptions, type of antibiotics prescribed and repeated prescribing of the same type of antibiotics within a specific duration. A retrospective audit consisting of two cycles (1st cycle: July to September 2018, 2nd cycle: July to September 2019) was carried out by manually collecting relevant data of patients (aged 18 and above) who were prescribed antibiotics from carbon copies of prescription books. Between each cycle, various interventions such as education through a continuous professional development (CPD) session, presentation of preliminary findings and making guidelines more accessible to dental officers were implemented. When the 1st and 2nd cycles were compared, the number of antibiotic prescriptions issued reduced from 194 to 136 (–30.0%) whereas the percentage of appropriate prescriptions increased slightly by 4.1%. Inaccurate prescriptions in terms of dosage and duration decreased (–0.5% and –13.7%, respectively) whilst drug form and frequency of intake increased (+15.7% and +0.7%, respectively). Repeated prescribing of the same antibiotics by the same officer within a period of ≤6 weeks no longer occurred. Amoxicillin and metronidazole were most commonly prescribed in both cycles. Overall, the antibiotic prescribing practices did not closely adhere to current guidelines. However, clinical audit in conjunction with targeted interventions resulted in improvement in the antibiotic prescribing patterns. Thus, further intervention and re-audit is necessary.","PeriodicalId":44961,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orofacial Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orofacial Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21315/aos2022.1701.oa01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in dentistry has been widely reported but local studies are scarce. We aimed to evaluate antibiotic prescribing practices among dental officers in a public dental primary care clinic against current guidelines: specifically assessing the number, appropriateness, accuracy of prescriptions, type of antibiotics prescribed and repeated prescribing of the same type of antibiotics within a specific duration. A retrospective audit consisting of two cycles (1st cycle: July to September 2018, 2nd cycle: July to September 2019) was carried out by manually collecting relevant data of patients (aged 18 and above) who were prescribed antibiotics from carbon copies of prescription books. Between each cycle, various interventions such as education through a continuous professional development (CPD) session, presentation of preliminary findings and making guidelines more accessible to dental officers were implemented. When the 1st and 2nd cycles were compared, the number of antibiotic prescriptions issued reduced from 194 to 136 (–30.0%) whereas the percentage of appropriate prescriptions increased slightly by 4.1%. Inaccurate prescriptions in terms of dosage and duration decreased (–0.5% and –13.7%, respectively) whilst drug form and frequency of intake increased (+15.7% and +0.7%, respectively). Repeated prescribing of the same antibiotics by the same officer within a period of ≤6 weeks no longer occurred. Amoxicillin and metronidazole were most commonly prescribed in both cycles. Overall, the antibiotic prescribing practices did not closely adhere to current guidelines. However, clinical audit in conjunction with targeted interventions resulted in improvement in the antibiotic prescribing patterns. Thus, further intervention and re-audit is necessary.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床审计和干预措施对抗生素处方实践在公共牙科初级保健诊所的影响
牙科中不适当的抗生素处方已被广泛报道,但当地的研究很少。我们的目的是根据现行指南评估公立牙科初级保健诊所牙科医生的抗生素处方做法:具体评估处方的数量、适当性、准确性、处方的抗生素类型以及在特定时间内重复开相同类型的抗生素。一项由两个周期组成的回顾性审计(第一个周期:2018年7月至9月,第二个周期:2019年7月到9月)通过手动收集处方书复写本中开具抗生素的患者(18岁及以上)的相关数据进行。在每个周期之间,实施了各种干预措施,如通过持续专业发展会议进行教育、介绍初步调查结果以及让牙科医生更容易获得指导方针。当比较第一个周期和第二个周期时,开出的抗生素处方数量从194张减少到136张(-30.0%),而合适处方的百分比略有增加4.1%。剂量和持续时间方面的不准确处方减少了(分别为-0.5%和-13.7%),药物形式和服用频率增加了(分别增加15.7%和+0.7%)。不再发生同一官员在≤6周内重复开具相同抗生素的情况。阿莫西林和甲硝唑是两个周期中最常见的处方。总的来说,抗生素处方的做法并没有严格遵守现行的指导方针。然而,临床审计结合有针对性的干预措施改善了抗生素处方模式。因此,有必要进行进一步的干预和重新审计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Orofacial Science
Archives of Orofacial Science DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Salvage Mandibulectomy in an Octogenarian with Recurrent Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report Histopathologic Changes in Dental Follicle Associated with Radiographically Normal Impacted Lower Third Molars The Key Role of Interleukin-17A/Interleukin-17RA in Bone Metabolism and Diseases: A Review An Enhanced Version of Sample Size Calculator, Scalex SP Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans of Parotid Region: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1