Psychometric evaluation of Iranian version of nursing faculty’s incivility questionnaire

Q4 Nursing Frontiers of Nursing Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.2478/fon-2023-0028
Zahra Abedini, S. Khanjari, Sima Hashemi
{"title":"Psychometric evaluation of Iranian version of nursing faculty’s incivility questionnaire","authors":"Zahra Abedini, S. Khanjari, Sima Hashemi","doi":"10.2478/fon-2023-0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective Faculty incivility is a growing problem in nursing schools that disrupts the learning process and affects nursing care of patients. Fostering and managing faculty incivility requires knowing this problem using a valid and reliable instrument. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the faculty’s perceived incivility questionnaire in the Iranian community. Methods In this methodological study, the participants involved were 357 nursing students. They were selected between October and December 2019. The faculty’s perceived incivility questionnaire was evaluated in terms of content and construct validity. McDonald’s omega and Cronbach’s alpha coefficients were calculated. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to evaluate the construct validity of the questionnaire. Results The content validity index (CVI) was 0.86–0.91 for the items and 0.87 for the whole instrument. In factor analysis, two factors of violent and irresponsible behaviors were extracted. These factors explained >41.769% of the variance. Model fit indices (Parsimonious Comparative Fit Index [PCFI] = 0.783, Parsimonious Normed Fit Index [PNFI] = 0.756, root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.051, Goodness-of-Fit Index [GFI] = 0.955, Adjusted Goodness-of-Fit Index [AGFI] = 0.932, Comparative Fit Index [CFI] = 0.955, χ2/df = 2.26) indicated the proportion of factors. Internal consistency was 0.87–0.93. Conclusions Faculty’s perceived incivility questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool with two factors that can be used to evaluate the incivility in Iranian faculty members.","PeriodicalId":52206,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Nursing","volume":"10 1","pages":"249 - 254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/fon-2023-0028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objective Faculty incivility is a growing problem in nursing schools that disrupts the learning process and affects nursing care of patients. Fostering and managing faculty incivility requires knowing this problem using a valid and reliable instrument. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the faculty’s perceived incivility questionnaire in the Iranian community. Methods In this methodological study, the participants involved were 357 nursing students. They were selected between October and December 2019. The faculty’s perceived incivility questionnaire was evaluated in terms of content and construct validity. McDonald’s omega and Cronbach’s alpha coefficients were calculated. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to evaluate the construct validity of the questionnaire. Results The content validity index (CVI) was 0.86–0.91 for the items and 0.87 for the whole instrument. In factor analysis, two factors of violent and irresponsible behaviors were extracted. These factors explained >41.769% of the variance. Model fit indices (Parsimonious Comparative Fit Index [PCFI] = 0.783, Parsimonious Normed Fit Index [PNFI] = 0.756, root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.051, Goodness-of-Fit Index [GFI] = 0.955, Adjusted Goodness-of-Fit Index [AGFI] = 0.932, Comparative Fit Index [CFI] = 0.955, χ2/df = 2.26) indicated the proportion of factors. Internal consistency was 0.87–0.93. Conclusions Faculty’s perceived incivility questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool with two factors that can be used to evaluate the incivility in Iranian faculty members.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊朗版护理教师不文明行为问卷的心理测量学评价
摘要目的护理学校教师不文明行为是一个日益严重的问题,它扰乱了学习过程,影响了患者的护理。培养和管理教师的无礼行为需要使用有效和可靠的工具来了解这个问题。本研究的目的是评估教师在伊朗社区的不文明感知问卷的有效性和可靠性。方法本研究共有357名护生参加。他们是在2019年10月至12月期间被选中的。从内容和结构有效性两个方面对教师的不文明感知问卷进行了评价。计算了麦克唐纳的ω和克朗巴赫的α系数。采用探索性和验证性因素分析对问卷的结构有效性进行评价。结果项目的内容有效性指数(CVI)为0.86–0.91,整个仪器的CVI为0.87。在因素分析中,提取了暴力行为和不负责任行为的两个因素。这些因素解释了>41.769%的方差。模型拟合指数(解析比较拟合指数[PCFI]=0.783,解析正态拟合指数[PNFI]=0.756,近似均方根误差[RMSEA]=0.051,拟合优度指数[GFI]=0.955,调整后拟合优度指标[AGFI]0.932,比较拟合指数[CFI]=0.955,χ2/df=2.26)表示因子的比例。内部一致性为0.87–0.93。结论教师不文明感知问卷是一种有效、可靠的工具,有两个因素可用于评估伊朗教师的不文明行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers of Nursing
Frontiers of Nursing Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Implementation and achievements of enhanced recovery after surgery program in perioperative management of gastric cancer patients† Impacts of fighting against COVID-19 on critical care nurses’ psychological and physical health: a literature review Investigating adverse events in long-term care facilities: a systematized review Detection and management of perioperative blood glucose abnormalities Knowledge, attitude, and practices related to medication errors among nursing professionals: a questionnaire-based study in a tertiary care hospital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1