Consolidated drained behaviour of PVA fibre reinforced cemented Toyoura Sand

IF 2.3 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Pub Date : 2021-12-14 DOI:10.1080/19386362.2021.2014685
Muhammad Safdar, T. Newson, Colin Schmidt, Kenichi Sato, T. Fujikawa
{"title":"Consolidated drained behaviour of PVA fibre reinforced cemented Toyoura Sand","authors":"Muhammad Safdar, T. Newson, Colin Schmidt, Kenichi Sato, T. Fujikawa","doi":"10.1080/19386362.2021.2014685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this study, a series of consolidated drained (CID) compression tests were performed On unreinforced and reinforced cemented Toyoura sand specimens. Specimens were cured for 3, 7, 14, 28, 56 days, with cement contents of 0–3% (dry weight), and different Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) fibre contents of 0, 0.5, 1, 2, and 3% (weight ratio). Samples were prepared to a target dry density value (e.g. = 1.489 g/cm3) of Toyoura sand using under-compaction moist tamping technique with 10% water content by dry weight of soil. Triaxial compression tests (CID) were carried out at a confining pressure of 100 kPa. The monotonic stress–strain, stiffness, volumetric change behaviour, dilatancy angle, peak strength, and residual strength and brittleness index of the samples were investigated in greater detail. Results show that peak strength increases due to increase in curing duration by approximately 50–700%, and 0–300% in residual strength at 30% axial strain, compared to Toyoura sand. For reinforced cemented specimens there is an increase in volumetric strain with increasing curing duration or in other words, the rate of dilation increases with the increase in curing period. The dilatancy behaviour increases due to the addition of fibres and cement, this dilative behaviour has been attributed to cemented particles forming highly interlocked clusters. Brittleness of the cemented specimens reinforced with 0.5%-1% fibres have been supressed significantly compared to the higher concentrations of fibre (2–3%). Hence, it shows that there might be a threshold fibre concentration range (0.5%-1%), where fibres are considered to be the most effective and beyond this concentration, fibre causes further adverse effects.","PeriodicalId":47238,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering","volume":"16 1","pages":"700 - 715"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2021.2014685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this study, a series of consolidated drained (CID) compression tests were performed On unreinforced and reinforced cemented Toyoura sand specimens. Specimens were cured for 3, 7, 14, 28, 56 days, with cement contents of 0–3% (dry weight), and different Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) fibre contents of 0, 0.5, 1, 2, and 3% (weight ratio). Samples were prepared to a target dry density value (e.g. = 1.489 g/cm3) of Toyoura sand using under-compaction moist tamping technique with 10% water content by dry weight of soil. Triaxial compression tests (CID) were carried out at a confining pressure of 100 kPa. The monotonic stress–strain, stiffness, volumetric change behaviour, dilatancy angle, peak strength, and residual strength and brittleness index of the samples were investigated in greater detail. Results show that peak strength increases due to increase in curing duration by approximately 50–700%, and 0–300% in residual strength at 30% axial strain, compared to Toyoura sand. For reinforced cemented specimens there is an increase in volumetric strain with increasing curing duration or in other words, the rate of dilation increases with the increase in curing period. The dilatancy behaviour increases due to the addition of fibres and cement, this dilative behaviour has been attributed to cemented particles forming highly interlocked clusters. Brittleness of the cemented specimens reinforced with 0.5%-1% fibres have been supressed significantly compared to the higher concentrations of fibre (2–3%). Hence, it shows that there might be a threshold fibre concentration range (0.5%-1%), where fibres are considered to be the most effective and beyond this concentration, fibre causes further adverse effects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
聚乙烯醇纤维增强toyoua砂的固结排水性能
摘要在本研究中,对未加筋和加筋胶结Toyura砂试样进行了一系列固结排水(CID)压缩试验。样品固化3、7、14、28、56天,水泥含量为0–3%(干重),不同聚乙烯醇(PVA)纤维含量为0、0.5、1、2和3%(重量比)。使用压实下湿夯技术将样品制备为Toyura砂的目标干密度值(例如=1.489g/cm3),含水量为土壤干重的10%。三轴压缩试验(CID)在100kPa的围压下进行。更详细地研究了样品的单调应力-应变、刚度、体积变化行为、剪胀角、峰值强度、残余强度和脆性指数。结果表明,与Toyoura砂相比,峰值强度增加的原因是固化时间增加了约50-700%,残余强度在30%轴向应变下增加了0-300%。对于增强水泥试件,体积应变随着固化时间的增加而增加,换句话说,膨胀率随着固化期的增加而增大。由于纤维和水泥的加入,膨胀行为增加,这种膨胀行为归因于胶结颗粒形成高度互锁的团簇。与较高浓度的纤维(2-3%)相比,用0.5%-1%纤维增强的胶结试样的脆性得到了显著抑制。因此,它表明可能存在一个阈值纤维浓度范围(0.5%-1%),其中纤维被认为是最有效的,超过该浓度,纤维会造成进一步的不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
De-carbonizing in construction using supplementary cementitious materials and accelerated carbonation technique - a review Assessment of p-y response of a laterally loaded single pile embedded in two-layered cohesionless substrata with inclined interface Optimization of water repellency in soils for geotechnical applications SWRC interpretation of iron ore tailings blends focusing on saturation assessment of dry stacking Influence of residual stress and soil dilatancy on the load capacity of jacked pile
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1