Creative Omnivores: An Experience Sampling Study of the Variety and Diversity of Everyday Creative Activities

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Creativity Research Journal Pub Date : 2023-06-21 DOI:10.1080/10400419.2023.2226453
P. Silvia, Katherine N. Cotter, Alexander P. Christensen
{"title":"Creative Omnivores: An Experience Sampling Study of the Variety and Diversity of Everyday Creative Activities","authors":"P. Silvia, Katherine N. Cotter, Alexander P. Christensen","doi":"10.1080/10400419.2023.2226453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Studies of everyday creativity suggest that some people are like creative omnivores, dabbling in a broad range of creative pursuits, but others are like picky eaters, focusing on a single creative passion. A week-long experience sampling study examined the breadth vs depth of 125 university students’ everyday creative activities. Several times a day, people were asked if they were doing something creative, and if they were, to describe what they were doing. Diversity statistics quantified the variety (number of distinct domains) and balance (the relative predominance of any domain) of their creative activities. The sample varied widely in both aspects of diversity, reflecting differences in whether people’s creative efforts were relatively broad or focused. Notably, people who were high in openness to experience showed significantly higher variety (they did more kinds of creative activities) yet lower balance (one or two activities predominated), suggesting that they had a broad creative diet but a few favorite foods. Plain Language Summary When people are spending time in their everyday lives working on creative activities, what are they actually doing? A small but growing literature on creativity in everyday life shows that creativity is common – many people spend much of their time on creative hobbies, passions, and pursuits – but not much is known about the kinds of things people are opting to do. In the present research, we explored the diversity and complexity of creative activities across a typical week. Using the metaphor of omnivores vs picky eaters, we suggest that some people are like creative omnivores, dabbling in a broad range of creative pursuits, and that others are like picky eaters, focusing on a single creative passion. In a week-long study of 125 adults, several times a day people were asked if they were doing something creative, and if they were, to describe what they were doing. Using diversity statistics, we found broad differences in the variety (how many different kinds of activities people did) and balance (whether one or two activities predominated) of people’s creative engagement. Overall, there’s no single profile for everyday creativity: some people enjoy spending time on many different kinds of creative tasks, and others focus their creative efforts on one or two areas.","PeriodicalId":48144,"journal":{"name":"Creativity Research Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Creativity Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2226453","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Studies of everyday creativity suggest that some people are like creative omnivores, dabbling in a broad range of creative pursuits, but others are like picky eaters, focusing on a single creative passion. A week-long experience sampling study examined the breadth vs depth of 125 university students’ everyday creative activities. Several times a day, people were asked if they were doing something creative, and if they were, to describe what they were doing. Diversity statistics quantified the variety (number of distinct domains) and balance (the relative predominance of any domain) of their creative activities. The sample varied widely in both aspects of diversity, reflecting differences in whether people’s creative efforts were relatively broad or focused. Notably, people who were high in openness to experience showed significantly higher variety (they did more kinds of creative activities) yet lower balance (one or two activities predominated), suggesting that they had a broad creative diet but a few favorite foods. Plain Language Summary When people are spending time in their everyday lives working on creative activities, what are they actually doing? A small but growing literature on creativity in everyday life shows that creativity is common – many people spend much of their time on creative hobbies, passions, and pursuits – but not much is known about the kinds of things people are opting to do. In the present research, we explored the diversity and complexity of creative activities across a typical week. Using the metaphor of omnivores vs picky eaters, we suggest that some people are like creative omnivores, dabbling in a broad range of creative pursuits, and that others are like picky eaters, focusing on a single creative passion. In a week-long study of 125 adults, several times a day people were asked if they were doing something creative, and if they were, to describe what they were doing. Using diversity statistics, we found broad differences in the variety (how many different kinds of activities people did) and balance (whether one or two activities predominated) of people’s creative engagement. Overall, there’s no single profile for everyday creativity: some people enjoy spending time on many different kinds of creative tasks, and others focus their creative efforts on one or two areas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创意杂烩:日常创意活动多样性的经验抽样研究
对日常创造力的研究表明,有些人就像创意杂食动物,涉猎广泛的创意追求,但有些人就像挑食者,专注于单一的创意激情。一项为期一周的经验抽样研究考察了125名大学生日常创造性活动的广度和深度。一天几次,人们被问及他们是否在做一些创造性的事情,如果是,描述他们在做什么。多样性统计量化了他们创造性活动的多样性(不同领域的数量)和平衡性(任何领域的相对优势)。样本在多样性的这两个方面差异很大,反映了人们的创造性努力是相对广泛的还是集中的差异。值得注意的是,经验开放性高的人表现出明显更高的多样性(他们做更多种类的创造性活动),但更低的平衡性(主要是一种或两种活动),这表明他们有广泛的创造性饮食,但喜欢的食物很少。当人们在日常生活中花时间从事创造性活动时,他们实际上在做什么?关于日常生活中创造力的文献很少,但越来越多的文献表明,创造力是很普遍的——许多人把大量时间花在创造性的爱好、激情和追求上——但人们选择做的事情却鲜为人知。在本研究中,我们探讨了创造性活动在一周内的多样性和复杂性。用杂食者和挑食者的比喻,我们认为有些人就像创造性的杂食者,涉足广泛的创造性追求,而另一些人就像挑食者,专注于单一的创造性激情。在一项对125名成年人进行的为期一周的研究中,研究人员每天多次询问人们是否在做一些有创意的事情,如果是的话,请他们描述他们在做什么。使用多样性统计数据,我们发现人们创造性投入的多样性(人们从事多少种不同的活动)和平衡性(一种或两种活动占主导地位)存在巨大差异。总的来说,日常创造力并没有单一的特征:有些人喜欢把时间花在许多不同的创造性任务上,而其他人则把创造性的努力集中在一两个领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Creativity Research Journal publishes high-quality, scholarly research capturing the full range of approaches to the study of creativity--behavioral, clinical, cognitive, crosscultural, developmental, educational, genetic, organizational, psychoanalytic, psychometrics, and social. Interdisciplinary research is also published, as is research within specific domains (e.g., art, science) and research on critical issues (e.g., aesthetics, genius, imagery, imagination, incubation, insight, intuition, metaphor, play, problem finding and solving). Integrative literature reviews and theoretical pieces that appreciate empirical work are extremely welcome, but purely speculative articles are not published. Readers are encouraged to send commentaries, comments, and evaluative book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Drawings’ Creativity: Synchrony Effects on Rater Bias and the Mediating Role of Emotional Arousal Inaugural Issue of CRJ as the Journal of the Society for the Neuroscience of Creativity: Introduction to Volume 2 of the Special Issue How Does Narrow AI Impact Human Creativity? Creativity in the West and the East: A Meta-Analysis of Cross-Cultural Differences Narcissism Mediates the Relationship Between Helicopter Parenting and Divergent Creativity, but Not Convergent Creativity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1