Evaluation of Preoperative Cardiology Consultations: Incidence, Characteristics and Implications for Perioperative Management

Mohamed Alioui, Wiam Eljellouli, Houssein Houmed, Tanae Elghali, Moncif Choubhi, Khalil Abou Elalaa
{"title":"Evaluation of Preoperative Cardiology Consultations: Incidence, Characteristics and Implications for Perioperative Management","authors":"Mohamed Alioui, Wiam Eljellouli, Houssein Houmed, Tanae Elghali, Moncif Choubhi, Khalil Abou Elalaa","doi":"10.29328/journal.jccm.1001160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This retrospective study examines the importance of preoperative cardiology consultations in optimizing patient care and anesthesia surgical perioperative management. Methods: The study includes 7,756 patients from the Department of Anesthesiology at Mohammed V Military Teaching Hospital. Out of these, 122 patients were referred to cardiology consultations. Demographics, surgical specialties, reasons for referral, diagnostic tests, and interventions were analyzed. Results: Referred patients (average age 61.45 years) were mainly over 65 years old, with 59.01% being male. Common surgical specialties seeking consultations were abdominal surgery (30.327%), orthopedic surgery (26.230%), and urological surgery (19.672%). Hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes were prevalent risk factors. Most patients were classified as ASA II (50%) or ASA III (27.04%), with NYHA I (61.5%) or NYHA II (31.2%) classifications. Referrals were due to ECG abnormalities (41.0%), routine evaluation (19.7%), and history of myocardial infarction or previous coronary angiography (39.3%). Discussion: Preoperative cardiology consultations accounted for 1.57% of all pre-anesthesia clinic patients. They were vital in assessing and managing cardiovascular risks, consistent with previous studies. The impact of these consultations was evident in optimizing patient management through treatment plan adjustments and interventions. Conclusion: Preoperative cardiology consultations play a crucial role in identifying and managing cardiovascular risks, contributing significantly to patient care and improving perioperative management. Further research should evaluate long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness across different patient populations.","PeriodicalId":92232,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiology and cardiovascular medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiology and cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.jccm.1001160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This retrospective study examines the importance of preoperative cardiology consultations in optimizing patient care and anesthesia surgical perioperative management. Methods: The study includes 7,756 patients from the Department of Anesthesiology at Mohammed V Military Teaching Hospital. Out of these, 122 patients were referred to cardiology consultations. Demographics, surgical specialties, reasons for referral, diagnostic tests, and interventions were analyzed. Results: Referred patients (average age 61.45 years) were mainly over 65 years old, with 59.01% being male. Common surgical specialties seeking consultations were abdominal surgery (30.327%), orthopedic surgery (26.230%), and urological surgery (19.672%). Hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes were prevalent risk factors. Most patients were classified as ASA II (50%) or ASA III (27.04%), with NYHA I (61.5%) or NYHA II (31.2%) classifications. Referrals were due to ECG abnormalities (41.0%), routine evaluation (19.7%), and history of myocardial infarction or previous coronary angiography (39.3%). Discussion: Preoperative cardiology consultations accounted for 1.57% of all pre-anesthesia clinic patients. They were vital in assessing and managing cardiovascular risks, consistent with previous studies. The impact of these consultations was evident in optimizing patient management through treatment plan adjustments and interventions. Conclusion: Preoperative cardiology consultations play a crucial role in identifying and managing cardiovascular risks, contributing significantly to patient care and improving perioperative management. Further research should evaluate long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness across different patient populations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术前心脏病学咨询的评估:发病率、特征及其对围手术期管理的意义
背景:本回顾性研究探讨了术前心脏病学咨询在优化患者护理和麻醉手术围手术期管理中的重要性。方法:本研究包括来自穆罕默德五世军事教学医院麻醉科的7756名患者。其中,122名患者接受了心脏病咨询。分析了人口统计学、外科专业、转诊原因、诊断测试和干预措施。结果:转诊患者(平均年龄61.45岁)主要年龄在65岁以上,其中男性占59.01%。寻求咨询的常见外科专业有腹部手术(30.327%)、骨科手术(26.230%)和泌尿外科手术(19.672%)。高血压、血脂异常和糖尿病是常见的危险因素。大多数患者被分为ASA II(50%)或ASA III(27.04%),NYHA I(61.5%)或NYHA II(31.2%)。转诊是由于心电图异常(41.0%)、常规评估(19.7%)和心肌梗死或既往冠状动脉造影史(39.3%)。讨论:术前心脏病咨询占所有麻醉前临床患者的1.57%。与之前的研究一致,它们在评估和管理心血管风险方面至关重要。这些咨询的影响在通过调整治疗计划和干预措施优化患者管理方面是显而易见的。结论:术前心脏病学咨询在识别和管理心血管风险方面发挥着至关重要的作用,对患者护理和改善围手术期管理有重要贡献。进一步的研究应该评估不同患者群体的长期结果和成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Non-surgical Techniques for Combined Rheumatic Severe Aortic and Mitral Stenosis – Case Series and Brief Review of Literature Chronic Ethanol Decreases the Left Ventricular Cardiac Performance A Complex Case with a Completely Percutaneous Solution: Treatment of a Severe Calcific Left Main in a Patient with Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis Rida Herbal Bitters Improve Cardiovascular Function in High-fat Diet/Streptozotocin-induced Diabetic Rats Calcium Scoring on CT Coronary Angiography in Hypertensive Patients as a Criterion for the Prediction of Coronary Artery Disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1