Confronting the traditional system: a qualitative study on the challenges to school based restorative practices policy implementation

Q2 Social Sciences Contemporary Justice Review Pub Date : 2021-07-03 DOI:10.1080/10282580.2021.1931844
Brett Hall, A. Keeney, D. Engstrom, P. Brazzel
{"title":"Confronting the traditional system: a qualitative study on the challenges to school based restorative practices policy implementation","authors":"Brett Hall, A. Keeney, D. Engstrom, P. Brazzel","doi":"10.1080/10282580.2021.1931844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT With the abundance of research that has come to fruition in recent years about the school to prison pipeline and rampant disproportionality of exclusionary discipline, the United States is starting to see a shift to a school-based restorative practices approach. Because of the nascent nature of this framework, research is far behind practice in schools, and knowledge about barriers to implementation is limited. This qualitative research study used purposive sampling and semi-structured interviews to review the experiences of 12 education professionals in San Diego County involved with restorative practice implementation. Participants believe an absence of administrative buy-in and a lack of resources prevent restorative practices from being executed with efficacy. Participants also stated that the resistance to change and the drastic change in culture, as well as societal factors, challenged restorative practices implementation. Findings suggest that restorative practices should be prioritized with intentionality by all levels of the public education system for more effective implementation in schools and more equitable outcomes for students.","PeriodicalId":10583,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Justice Review","volume":"24 1","pages":"361 - 383"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10282580.2021.1931844","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Justice Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2021.1931844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT With the abundance of research that has come to fruition in recent years about the school to prison pipeline and rampant disproportionality of exclusionary discipline, the United States is starting to see a shift to a school-based restorative practices approach. Because of the nascent nature of this framework, research is far behind practice in schools, and knowledge about barriers to implementation is limited. This qualitative research study used purposive sampling and semi-structured interviews to review the experiences of 12 education professionals in San Diego County involved with restorative practice implementation. Participants believe an absence of administrative buy-in and a lack of resources prevent restorative practices from being executed with efficacy. Participants also stated that the resistance to change and the drastic change in culture, as well as societal factors, challenged restorative practices implementation. Findings suggest that restorative practices should be prioritized with intentionality by all levels of the public education system for more effective implementation in schools and more equitable outcomes for students.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
直面传统制度:基于学校的恢复性实践政策实施挑战的定性研究
摘要近年来,随着大量关于从学校到监狱的研究取得成果,以及排斥性学科的比例失调,美国开始转向以学校为基础的恢复性实践方法。由于这一框架的新生性质,研究远远落后于学校的实践,关于实施障碍的知识也很有限。这项定性研究使用了有目的的抽样和半结构化访谈,回顾了圣地亚哥县12名教育专业人员参与恢复性实践实施的经验。参与者认为,缺乏行政支持和资源阻碍了恢复性做法的有效实施。与会者还指出,对变革的抵制和文化的剧烈变化,以及社会因素,对恢复性做法的实施提出了挑战。研究结果表明,各级公共教育系统应出于意愿优先考虑恢复性做法,以便在学校更有效地实施,并为学生带来更公平的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Justice Review
Contemporary Justice Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Cultivating just campus communities: engaging university students in developing restorative justice alternatives Defining restorative justice: a perspective from England and Wales’s further education sector The agricultural prison industry: a scoping review The international criminal court and responsibility for mass atrocities: can JCE enhance capacity to hold masterminds accountable? Restorative justice for adult offenders in South Australia: judicial perspectives and insights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1