Revisiting the Singaporean values to welfare as foundational ideas of Central Provident Fund development

IF 1.3 Q2 SOCIAL WORK Asian Social Work and Policy Review Pub Date : 2021-06-06 DOI:10.1111/aswp.12233
Tauchid Komara Yuda, Pinurba Parama Pratiyudha, Kafa Abdallah Kafaa
{"title":"Revisiting the Singaporean values to welfare as foundational ideas of Central Provident Fund development","authors":"Tauchid Komara Yuda,&nbsp;Pinurba Parama Pratiyudha,&nbsp;Kafa Abdallah Kafaa","doi":"10.1111/aswp.12233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This succinct review returns to the debate on political-culture and Singaporean social policy nexus that has been abandoned since 2000. They put the spotlight on the social policy through the Confucian lens, examining to what extent Confucianism teaching was conditioned in formal welfare provisions. Yet, they are too focused on the common idea of Confucianism while overlooking the original idea of Singaporean value promoted by Lee Kuan Yew. Hence, this article raises the discussion of the links of Singaporean values and the Central Provident Found (CPF) which have barely been highlighted in the literature. Singaporean values are hybrid between Confucianism and Western values. This article argues that although the CPF has expanded in terms of features and benefits, it has not crossed the line that separates Singapore from Western models. Because of its Singaporean values, the country does not follow the typical European model, which is being adopted by other East Asian countries. This article concludes the CPF not only reflects its centrality to Singaporean values but also as a value stabilizer that has long history in contributing to Singaporean nation-building.</p>","PeriodicalId":44567,"journal":{"name":"Asian Social Work and Policy Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/aswp.12233","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Social Work and Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aswp.12233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This succinct review returns to the debate on political-culture and Singaporean social policy nexus that has been abandoned since 2000. They put the spotlight on the social policy through the Confucian lens, examining to what extent Confucianism teaching was conditioned in formal welfare provisions. Yet, they are too focused on the common idea of Confucianism while overlooking the original idea of Singaporean value promoted by Lee Kuan Yew. Hence, this article raises the discussion of the links of Singaporean values and the Central Provident Found (CPF) which have barely been highlighted in the literature. Singaporean values are hybrid between Confucianism and Western values. This article argues that although the CPF has expanded in terms of features and benefits, it has not crossed the line that separates Singapore from Western models. Because of its Singaporean values, the country does not follow the typical European model, which is being adopted by other East Asian countries. This article concludes the CPF not only reflects its centrality to Singaporean values but also as a value stabilizer that has long history in contributing to Singaporean nation-building.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新审视新加坡的福利价值观作为中央公积金发展的基本理念
这篇简洁的评论回到了自2000年以来被抛弃的关于政治文化和新加坡社会政策关系的辩论。他们通过儒家的镜头关注社会政策,考察儒家的教学在多大程度上以正式的福利规定为条件。然而,他们过于关注儒家的共同理念,而忽视了李光耀所倡导的新加坡价值的原始理念。因此,本文提出了新加坡价值观和中央公积金基金(CPF)之间的联系的讨论,这在文献中几乎没有得到强调。新加坡的价值观是儒家思想和西方价值观的混合体。本文认为,尽管公积金制度在功能和利益方面有所扩展,但它并没有超越新加坡与西方模式的界限。由于新加坡的价值观,这个国家没有遵循典型的欧洲模式,而其他东亚国家正在采用这种模式。本文的结论是,公积金不仅反映了它在新加坡价值观中的中心地位,而且作为一种价值稳定器,在新加坡的国家建设中有着悠久的历史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: There is a growing recognition that major social trends, such as the process of globalization, rapidly changing demography, increasing psycho-social difficulties in individuals and families, growing economic disparities within and between the nations, and international migration, present important challenges for social policies and social work practices in Asia. It also has become evident that social policy strategies and social work methods must be developed and implemented in the context of Asian region''s own histories, cultures, and unique developmental trajectories in order to respond effectively to those emerging challenges. The Asian Social Work and Policy Review seeks to encourage exchanges of original ideas, rigorous analysis of experiences, innovative practice methods founded on local knowledge and skills of problem solving in the areas of social work and social policy between various countries in Asia.
期刊最新文献
Home-based elderly care development in Hebei Province, China: A systematic literature review The Effects of Caring for Grandchildren on Health and Well-Being of Grandparents: Evidence From Vietnam Trends in Distress-Free Life Expectancy in Japan, 2010–2022 Parenthood and gender inequality on labor market outcomes: Evidence from South Korea Behavioral reasoning theory perspectives on voluntary social insurance: The roles of collectivism and long-term orientation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1