Conceptualizing critical practice in social work: an integration of recognition and redistribution

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL WORK European Journal of Social Work Pub Date : 2021-09-15 DOI:10.1080/13691457.2021.1977250
Shachar Timor-Shlevin
{"title":"Conceptualizing critical practice in social work: an integration of recognition and redistribution","authors":"Shachar Timor-Shlevin","doi":"10.1080/13691457.2021.1977250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the current construction of critical theory of social work practice, recognition is a central explanatory concept. It informs critical practice as primarily relational, focused on providing respect and visibility for service users, and allowing their voices to be heard. However, while critical political theory emphasizes the ethical commitment to integrating recognition with redistribution, the focus on recognition in social work practice hinders the conceptualization of providing material support as a valuable practice. This gap may lead to the construction of direct social work as irrelevant for people living in poverty and social exclusion, who suffer from a lack of both recognition and redistribution. This article offers an integrated model for critical social work practice in which recognition and redistribution intersect. This model identifies four different types of casework practice: isolated emotional support, isolated material assistance, managerialist withdrawal, and critical practice, and contributes to the construction of a relevant theory of critical practice for social work.","PeriodicalId":12060,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Social Work","volume":"26 1","pages":"28 - 40"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2021.1977250","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the current construction of critical theory of social work practice, recognition is a central explanatory concept. It informs critical practice as primarily relational, focused on providing respect and visibility for service users, and allowing their voices to be heard. However, while critical political theory emphasizes the ethical commitment to integrating recognition with redistribution, the focus on recognition in social work practice hinders the conceptualization of providing material support as a valuable practice. This gap may lead to the construction of direct social work as irrelevant for people living in poverty and social exclusion, who suffer from a lack of both recognition and redistribution. This article offers an integrated model for critical social work practice in which recognition and redistribution intersect. This model identifies four different types of casework practice: isolated emotional support, isolated material assistance, managerialist withdrawal, and critical practice, and contributes to the construction of a relevant theory of critical practice for social work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会工作中批判性实践的概念化:认知与再分配的整合
在当前社会工作实践批判理论的建构中,承认是一个核心的解释性概念。它将批判性实践作为主要的关系,重点是为服务用户提供尊重和可见性,并允许他们的声音被听到。然而,尽管批判政治理论强调将承认与再分配相结合的伦理承诺,但社会工作实践中对承认的关注阻碍了将提供物质支持作为一种有价值的实践的概念化。这种差距可能导致直接社会工作的构建与生活在贫困和社会排斥中的人无关,他们遭受缺乏承认和再分配的痛苦。本文为批判性社会工作实践提供了一个认知与再分配交叉的综合模型。该模型确定了四种不同类型的个案工作实践:孤立的情感支持、孤立的物质援助、管理者退缩和批判性实践,并有助于构建社会工作批判性实践的相关理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Social Work provides a forum for the social professions in all parts of Europe and beyond. It analyses and promotes European and international developments in social work, social policy, social service institutions, and strategies for social change by publishing refereed papers on contemporary key issues. Contributions include theoretical debates, empirical studies, research notes, country perspectives, and reviews. It maintains an interdisciplinary perspective which recognises positively the diversity of cultural and conceptual traditions in which the social professions of Europe are grounded. In particular it examines emerging European paradigms in methodology and comparative analysis.
期刊最新文献
When the outside penetrates the inside: the relationship between Palestinian Israeli and Jewish Israeli social workers in mixed cities during the events of May 2021 Discretion for whom? Local policies and the agency problem between politicians and care managers in Swedish social service ‘There is a fear of not being SUPER knowledgeable’ – social workers striving to enhance children’s participation in the assessment process for disability support The bridging role of social work: the quest towards installing a structural approach within primary health care Social work competence in disaster management: an integrative review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1