Creating equitable access: using OER for socially just educational leaders

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal for Multicultural Education Pub Date : 2022-10-12 DOI:10.1108/jme-12-2021-0224
S. Richardson, Jacqueline Roebuck Sakho
{"title":"Creating equitable access: using OER for socially just educational leaders","authors":"S. Richardson, Jacqueline Roebuck Sakho","doi":"10.1108/jme-12-2021-0224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to demonstrate ways in which educator preparation programs can influence educator and administrator support of Open Education Resources (OER). OER is still not used as widely as the researchers would like, even though it was introduced in the year 2002 (Bliss and Smith, 2017). While it is rarely used to a large extent, it is especially lacking in K-12 schools. By introducing OER to educator candidates (including future principals) in their own programs, they may be supportive of OER and invest in them when they work in schools.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe research was conducted when an OER project was required in educator preparation programs. Two classes totaling 27 students engaged in a group project, creating OER materials and receptacles over the course of the semester.\n\n\nFindings\nResearch showed that educator candidates were in favor of using OER thoroughly. Through building their own OER resources, educator candidates understood the importance of creating socially just and equitable learning environments, aligning with diversity, equity, inclusion and belonging.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, a project like this has not been researched before. This research supports the idea that usage of OER and investment in it should happen for all educator candidates (teachers and administrators).\n","PeriodicalId":43323,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Multicultural Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Multicultural Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jme-12-2021-0224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate ways in which educator preparation programs can influence educator and administrator support of Open Education Resources (OER). OER is still not used as widely as the researchers would like, even though it was introduced in the year 2002 (Bliss and Smith, 2017). While it is rarely used to a large extent, it is especially lacking in K-12 schools. By introducing OER to educator candidates (including future principals) in their own programs, they may be supportive of OER and invest in them when they work in schools. Design/methodology/approach The research was conducted when an OER project was required in educator preparation programs. Two classes totaling 27 students engaged in a group project, creating OER materials and receptacles over the course of the semester. Findings Research showed that educator candidates were in favor of using OER thoroughly. Through building their own OER resources, educator candidates understood the importance of creating socially just and equitable learning environments, aligning with diversity, equity, inclusion and belonging. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, a project like this has not been researched before. This research supports the idea that usage of OER and investment in it should happen for all educator candidates (teachers and administrators).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创造公平的机会:为社会公正的教育领导者使用OER
目的本文的目的是展示教育者准备计划如何影响教育者和管理者对开放教育资源(OER)的支持。尽管OER在2002年被引入,但它仍然没有像研究人员希望的那样广泛使用(Bliss和Smith, 2017)。虽然它很少在很大程度上使用,但在K-12学校尤其缺乏。通过在他们自己的项目中向教育候选人(包括未来的校长)介绍OER,他们可能会支持OER,并在他们在学校工作时投资OER。设计/方法/方法本研究是在教育工作者培训项目需要OER项目时进行的。两个班共27名学生参与了一个小组项目,在整个学期的课程中制作OER材料和容器。调查结果表明,教育候选人赞成彻底使用OER。通过建立自己的OER资源,教育者候选人了解了创造社会公正和公平的学习环境的重要性,并与多样性、公平、包容和归属感保持一致。原创性/价值据作者所知,这样的项目之前还没有被研究过。这项研究支持了这样一种观点,即所有教育工作者候选人(教师和管理人员)都应该使用OER并对其进行投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Multicultural Education
Journal for Multicultural Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
18.20%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Journal for Multicultural Education is a double-blind peer reviewed journal. Published quarterly, the editorial objectives and coverage focus on: Fostering research into the management of multicultural education, understanding multicultural education in the context of teacher-learner equity and enabling learners to collaborate more effectively across ethnic, cultural and linguistic lines. Topics covered include: -Intercultural education- Inclusive education- Urban education- Diversity in education- Ethnicity in education- Gender and education- Disability and education- Technology and Multicultural education The journal is international in coverage and publishes original, theoretical and applied articles by leading scholars, expert consultants and respected practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Fostering newly resettled refugee-background adolescents’ self-efficacy and advocacy in a community-based youth program Venezuelan migration to Brazil: teachers and students co-constructing multicultural education inside classrooms The relationship between classroom racial/ethnic composition and teacher perceptions of work conditions “I am afflicted with the evil eye!” How Islamic cultural beliefs influence college students’ perceptions of their academic experience The significance of ethnomathematics learning: a cross-cultural perspectives between Indonesian and Thailand educators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1