{"title":"Diagnostic value of T cells spot test of tuberculosis infection on blood and cerebrospinal fluid for tuberculous meningitis","authors":"Qing-luan Yang, Bingyan Zhang, Qianqian Liu, Wei Zhang, Yuanyuan Liu, X. Weng, L. Shao, Wenhong Zhang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6680.2018.10.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo evaluate the diagnostic value of T cells spot test of tuberculosis infection (T-SPOT.TB) on blood and cerebrospinal fluid for tuberculous meningitis (TBM). \n \n \nMethods \nOne hundred and fifteen adult patients with suspected tuberculous meningitis were retrospectively enrolled from March 2013 to March 2017 in Huashan Hospital affiliated to Fudan University. Among them, 30 were diagnosed with TBM (7 definite, 19 highly probable and 4 possible), 37 with other infectious meningitis and 29 with non-infectious meningitis. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) of T-SPOT.TB on peripheral mononuclear cells (PBMC) and cerebrospinal fluid mononuclear cells (CSF-MC) were analyzed using Fisher exact test, and the diagnostic performance was evaluated by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC). \n \n \nResults \nWhen including the 30 TBM cases and 66 non-TBM cases into analysis, the sensitivities and specificities, PPV and NPV of PBMC and CSF-MC for diagnosing TBM were as follows: 93.1% and 66.7%, 77% and 87.7%, 65.9% and 71.4%, 95.9% and 85.1%, respectively. When including the 30 TBM and 37 other infectious meningitis into analysis, the sensitivities and specificities, PPV and NPV of the PBMC and CSF-MC for diagnosing TBM were as follows: 93.1% and 66.7%, 68.6% and 86.5%, 71.1% and 80.0%, 92.3% and 76.2%, respectively. By ROC curve analysis, the AUC of blood and CSF were 0.882 (95%CI: 0.795-0.969) and 0.814 (95% CI: 0.704-0.925), respectively. Using a cut-off value of 32 spot forming cells (SFC) per million CSF-MC for T-SPOT.TB on CSF-MC showed a sensitivity of 66.7%, a specificity of 91.9%, PPV of 87.0% and NPV of 77.3%. The positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were 8.22 and 0.363 respectively. \n \n \nConclusions \nT-SPOT.TB on CSF-MC has a role in diagnosing TBM. And 32 SFC per million CSF-MC might be the optimal cut-off value to differentiate TBM and non-TBM. \n \n \nKey words: \nT cells spot test of tuberculosis infection; Cerebrospinal fluid; Tuberculosis, meningeal; Diagnosis","PeriodicalId":10127,"journal":{"name":"中华传染病杂志","volume":"36 1","pages":"622-626"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华传染病杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6680.2018.10.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the diagnostic value of T cells spot test of tuberculosis infection (T-SPOT.TB) on blood and cerebrospinal fluid for tuberculous meningitis (TBM).
Methods
One hundred and fifteen adult patients with suspected tuberculous meningitis were retrospectively enrolled from March 2013 to March 2017 in Huashan Hospital affiliated to Fudan University. Among them, 30 were diagnosed with TBM (7 definite, 19 highly probable and 4 possible), 37 with other infectious meningitis and 29 with non-infectious meningitis. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) of T-SPOT.TB on peripheral mononuclear cells (PBMC) and cerebrospinal fluid mononuclear cells (CSF-MC) were analyzed using Fisher exact test, and the diagnostic performance was evaluated by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC).
Results
When including the 30 TBM cases and 66 non-TBM cases into analysis, the sensitivities and specificities, PPV and NPV of PBMC and CSF-MC for diagnosing TBM were as follows: 93.1% and 66.7%, 77% and 87.7%, 65.9% and 71.4%, 95.9% and 85.1%, respectively. When including the 30 TBM and 37 other infectious meningitis into analysis, the sensitivities and specificities, PPV and NPV of the PBMC and CSF-MC for diagnosing TBM were as follows: 93.1% and 66.7%, 68.6% and 86.5%, 71.1% and 80.0%, 92.3% and 76.2%, respectively. By ROC curve analysis, the AUC of blood and CSF were 0.882 (95%CI: 0.795-0.969) and 0.814 (95% CI: 0.704-0.925), respectively. Using a cut-off value of 32 spot forming cells (SFC) per million CSF-MC for T-SPOT.TB on CSF-MC showed a sensitivity of 66.7%, a specificity of 91.9%, PPV of 87.0% and NPV of 77.3%. The positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were 8.22 and 0.363 respectively.
Conclusions
T-SPOT.TB on CSF-MC has a role in diagnosing TBM. And 32 SFC per million CSF-MC might be the optimal cut-off value to differentiate TBM and non-TBM.
Key words:
T cells spot test of tuberculosis infection; Cerebrospinal fluid; Tuberculosis, meningeal; Diagnosis
期刊介绍:
The Chinese Journal of Infectious Diseases was founded in February 1983. It is an academic journal on infectious diseases supervised by the China Association for Science and Technology, sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association, and hosted by the Shanghai Medical Association. The journal targets infectious disease physicians as its main readers, taking into account physicians of other interdisciplinary disciplines, and timely reports on leading scientific research results and clinical diagnosis and treatment experience in the field of infectious diseases, as well as basic theoretical research that has a guiding role in the clinical practice of infectious diseases and is closely integrated with the actual clinical practice of infectious diseases. Columns include reviews (including editor-in-chief reviews), expert lectures, consensus and guidelines (including interpretations), monographs, short monographs, academic debates, epidemic news, international dynamics, case reports, reviews, lectures, meeting minutes, etc.