Differences in venous, capillary and interstitial glucose concentrations in individuals without diabetes after glucose load

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Journal of Laboratory Medicine Pub Date : 2023-04-19 DOI:10.1515/labmed-2023-0013
Stefan Pleus, S. Schauer, A. Baumstark, Alexandra Beil, N. Jendrike, Manuela Link, Eva Zschornack, Anne Beltzer, C. Haug, G. Freckmann
{"title":"Differences in venous, capillary and interstitial glucose concentrations in individuals without diabetes after glucose load","authors":"Stefan Pleus, S. Schauer, A. Baumstark, Alexandra Beil, N. Jendrike, Manuela Link, Eva Zschornack, Anne Beltzer, C. Haug, G. Freckmann","doi":"10.1515/labmed-2023-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives Differences between capillary and venous glucose concentrations have been reported in the past. In continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system performance studies, comparator measurements are often performed in venous samples, despite CGM systems typically aiming at providing capillary-like values. In this study, differences between venous, capillary and interstitial glucose concentrations, measured with a laboratory analyzer, a self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) system and an intermittent-scanning CGM system were investigated in subjects without diabetes after glucose load. Methods During the study, an oral glucose tolerance test (oGTT) was performed with 41 participants who had no known history of diabetes (mean age 25.5 ± 9.7 years). Venous blood samples for measurement with a laboratory analyzer were collected before drinking the standardized 75 g glucose solution and after 60 and 120 min. In parallel, capillary blood was obtained for measurement with a laboratory analyzer and an SMBG system, and interstitial glucose values were measured with an intermittent-scanning CGM system. Results Glucose concentrations in the fasting state were slightly different for the three different compartments whereas considerable differences (some median differences exceeding 30 %) in glucose concentration were observed 60 and 120 min after the start of the oGTT. Conclusions Marked differences with a high inter-individual variability between venous, capillary, and interstitial fluid glucose concentrations were found especially after glucose load. These differences can affect perceived CGM accuracy in performance studies depending on the specific comparator method used, and they are potentially relevant in clinical practice, like diabetes diagnosis.","PeriodicalId":55986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2023-0013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Differences between capillary and venous glucose concentrations have been reported in the past. In continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system performance studies, comparator measurements are often performed in venous samples, despite CGM systems typically aiming at providing capillary-like values. In this study, differences between venous, capillary and interstitial glucose concentrations, measured with a laboratory analyzer, a self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) system and an intermittent-scanning CGM system were investigated in subjects without diabetes after glucose load. Methods During the study, an oral glucose tolerance test (oGTT) was performed with 41 participants who had no known history of diabetes (mean age 25.5 ± 9.7 years). Venous blood samples for measurement with a laboratory analyzer were collected before drinking the standardized 75 g glucose solution and after 60 and 120 min. In parallel, capillary blood was obtained for measurement with a laboratory analyzer and an SMBG system, and interstitial glucose values were measured with an intermittent-scanning CGM system. Results Glucose concentrations in the fasting state were slightly different for the three different compartments whereas considerable differences (some median differences exceeding 30 %) in glucose concentration were observed 60 and 120 min after the start of the oGTT. Conclusions Marked differences with a high inter-individual variability between venous, capillary, and interstitial fluid glucose concentrations were found especially after glucose load. These differences can affect perceived CGM accuracy in performance studies depending on the specific comparator method used, and they are potentially relevant in clinical practice, like diabetes diagnosis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无糖尿病患者葡萄糖负荷后静脉、毛细血管和间质葡萄糖浓度的差异
【摘要】目的过去曾报道过毛细血管和静脉葡萄糖浓度的差异。在连续血糖监测(CGM)系统性能研究中,尽管CGM系统通常旨在提供毛细血管样值,但通常在静脉样本中进行比较器测量。在这项研究中,通过实验室分析仪、自我血糖监测系统(SMBG)和间歇扫描CGM系统测量了非糖尿病受试者在葡萄糖负荷后静脉、毛细血管和间质葡萄糖浓度的差异。方法在研究过程中,对41名无糖尿病史的参与者(平均年龄25.5±9.7 岁)进行口服葡萄糖耐量试验(oGTT)。在饮用标准化75 g葡萄糖溶液前和60和120 min后采集静脉血样本,用实验室分析仪进行测量。同时,用实验室分析仪和SMBG系统测量毛细血管血,用间歇扫描CGM系统测量间质葡萄糖值。结果空腹葡萄糖浓度在三个不同的室间略有不同,而葡萄糖浓度在oGTT开始后60和120 min观察到相当大的差异(一些中位数差异超过30 %)。结论静脉、毛细血管和间质液葡萄糖浓度存在显著差异,个体间差异较大,尤其是在葡萄糖负荷后。根据所使用的具体比较方法,这些差异可能会影响性能研究中感知到的CGM准确性,并且它们在临床实践中具有潜在的相关性,如糖尿病诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Laboratory Medicine
Journal of Laboratory Medicine Mathematics-Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Laboratory Medicine (JLM) is a bi-monthly published journal that reports on the latest developments in laboratory medicine. Particular focus is placed on the diagnostic aspects of the clinical laboratory, although technical, regulatory, and educational topics are equally covered. The Journal specializes in the publication of high-standard, competent and timely review articles on clinical, methodological and pathogenic aspects of modern laboratory diagnostics. These reviews are critically reviewed by expert reviewers and JLM’s Associate Editors who are specialists in the various subdisciplines of laboratory medicine. In addition, JLM publishes original research articles, case reports, point/counterpoint articles and letters to the editor, all of which are peer reviewed by at least two experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the stability of uncentrifuged serum and plasma analytes at various post-collection intervals How Gaussian mixture modelling can help to verify reference intervals from laboratory data with a high proportion of pathological values Using machine learning techniques for exploration and classification of laboratory data Automated sex and age partitioning for the estimation of reference intervals using a regression tree model Serum LDH and its isoenzymes (LDH2 and LDH5) associated with predictive value for refractory mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1