Verbal communication abilities checklist as an instrument to assess Brazilian children’s pragmatic profile

Camila Mayumi Abe Ingraci, S. Lopes-Herrera
{"title":"Verbal communication abilities checklist as an instrument to assess Brazilian children’s pragmatic profile","authors":"Camila Mayumi Abe Ingraci, S. Lopes-Herrera","doi":"10.1558/jircd.19971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this research was to develop a checklist to assess the pragmatic profile of Brazilian children aged 3–8 years.\nMethods: The Verbal Communication Abilities (VCA) checklist was adapted from the Protocol for Verbal Communicative Abilities (Lopes, 2000). In order to evaluate the checklist’s reliability and effectiveness, the pilot version of the VCA checklist was used by three speech-language pathologists (SLPs) for the analysis of two identical 30-minute videos of parent–child interactions: one of a child with typical language development and the other of a child with language-impairment. The SLPs suggested adjustments to the checklist, which were then integrated and led to a final version. Next, the final checklist’s effectiveness and sensitivity to pragmatic deficiencies were assessed using a sample size of 30 children. Data were gathered by two SLPs, who employed the checklist when analyzing 30 videos of parent–child interactions. Participants were divided into two groups: G1, composed of 15 children previously diagnosed with language disorders, and G2, composed of 15 children with typical language development; both groups were matched for age and gender.\nResults: Significant differences were found between the two groups in the dialogue and narrative discursive categories.\nConclusion: The checklist is an efficient and reliable tool for identifying pragmatic deficiencies faster and more easily than existing pragmatic tests and protocols.","PeriodicalId":52222,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.19971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this research was to develop a checklist to assess the pragmatic profile of Brazilian children aged 3–8 years. Methods: The Verbal Communication Abilities (VCA) checklist was adapted from the Protocol for Verbal Communicative Abilities (Lopes, 2000). In order to evaluate the checklist’s reliability and effectiveness, the pilot version of the VCA checklist was used by three speech-language pathologists (SLPs) for the analysis of two identical 30-minute videos of parent–child interactions: one of a child with typical language development and the other of a child with language-impairment. The SLPs suggested adjustments to the checklist, which were then integrated and led to a final version. Next, the final checklist’s effectiveness and sensitivity to pragmatic deficiencies were assessed using a sample size of 30 children. Data were gathered by two SLPs, who employed the checklist when analyzing 30 videos of parent–child interactions. Participants were divided into two groups: G1, composed of 15 children previously diagnosed with language disorders, and G2, composed of 15 children with typical language development; both groups were matched for age and gender. Results: Significant differences were found between the two groups in the dialogue and narrative discursive categories. Conclusion: The checklist is an efficient and reliable tool for identifying pragmatic deficiencies faster and more easily than existing pragmatic tests and protocols.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以语言沟通能力清单评估巴西儿童语用特征
目的:本研究的目的是制定一份清单,以评估巴西3-8岁儿童的语用特征。方法:言语交际能力(VCA)检查表改编自《言语交际能力协议》(Lopes,2000)。为了评估检查表的可靠性和有效性,三位言语语言病理学家(SLP)使用了VCA检查表的试点版本来分析两个相同的30分钟亲子互动视频:一个是典型语言发育的儿童,另一个是语言障碍的儿童。SLP建议对检查表进行调整,然后进行整合,形成最终版本。接下来,使用30名儿童的样本量来评估最终检查表的有效性和对语用缺陷的敏感性。数据由两名SLP收集,他们在分析30段亲子互动视频时使用了检查表。参与者被分为两组:G1组,由15名先前被诊断为语言障碍的儿童组成,G2组,由具有典型语言发展的15名儿童组成;两组在年龄和性别上匹配。结果:两组在对话和叙述话语两个方面存在显著差异。结论:与现有的语用测试和协议相比,该检查表是一种高效可靠的工具,可以更快、更容易地识别语用缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders
Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊最新文献
Adapting educational speech-language pathology services during a pandemic Integrating the HBM and the PEN-3 model to explain the health behavior of persons with DLD Discourse repetition and phonetic reduction in a person with dysarthria secondary to Parkinson’s disease Association between the degree of autism and permissiveness of pragmatic impairments in Japanese-speaking adults with and without autism spectrum disorder Diagnostic accuracy of current assessment measures for developmental language disorders in bilingual children
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1