Why is evacuation so difficult? Sociocultural aspects of landslide disaster in Ponorogo, Indonesia

IF 2 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Disaster Prevention and Management Pub Date : 2020-11-18 DOI:10.1108/dpm-04-2019-0123
D. Purworini, Desi Puji Hartuti, Dini Purnamasari
{"title":"Why is evacuation so difficult? Sociocultural aspects of landslide disaster in Ponorogo, Indonesia","authors":"D. Purworini, Desi Puji Hartuti, Dini Purnamasari","doi":"10.1108/dpm-04-2019-0123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeSociocultural aspects of populations residing in disaster-prone areas have not often been discussed in disaster evacuation studies. Therefore, the main purpose of this paper is to describe the sociocultural factors affecting evacuation decision-making.Design/methodology/approachThis was an exploratory research study which used in-depth semi-structured interviews to collect the data. Selection of the informants was also fulfilled via the purposive sampling method with regard to specific criteria. The informants consisted of 20 villagers that had faced a disaster and eight staff members of the Regional Board of Disaster Management of the Republic of Indonesia which is Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah (BPBD), Ponorogo, who had managed it. The data analysis was ultimately performed through thematic coding.FindingsThe results of the coding analysis revealed that sociocultural aspects were among the primary reasons for evacuation decisions before disasters. In this paper, sociocultural factors shaping evacuation decision behavior could be a result of norms, roles, language, leadership, rules, habits, jobs, perceptions, family engagement, as well as other behaviors demonstrated by individuals and the community.Research limitations/implicationsThis study is not analyzing the role of the social organization or a religious one and also the economic aspect in the evacuation decision-making.Practical implicationsThis paper includes implications for the local government and the BPBD Ponorogo to establish an efficient communication strategy persuading villagers to evacuate. In general, formal policies cannot always be implemented in managing disaster; therefore, visible dedication and solidarity of the members are always needed in order to manage evacuation problems.Originality/valueThis paper meets needs for a study delineating sociocultural factors affecting evacuation decisions before disasters strike. Sociocultural theory could also describe real aspects of culture inherent in the daily lives of populations living in disaster-prone areas.","PeriodicalId":47687,"journal":{"name":"Disaster Prevention and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disaster Prevention and Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dpm-04-2019-0123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeSociocultural aspects of populations residing in disaster-prone areas have not often been discussed in disaster evacuation studies. Therefore, the main purpose of this paper is to describe the sociocultural factors affecting evacuation decision-making.Design/methodology/approachThis was an exploratory research study which used in-depth semi-structured interviews to collect the data. Selection of the informants was also fulfilled via the purposive sampling method with regard to specific criteria. The informants consisted of 20 villagers that had faced a disaster and eight staff members of the Regional Board of Disaster Management of the Republic of Indonesia which is Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah (BPBD), Ponorogo, who had managed it. The data analysis was ultimately performed through thematic coding.FindingsThe results of the coding analysis revealed that sociocultural aspects were among the primary reasons for evacuation decisions before disasters. In this paper, sociocultural factors shaping evacuation decision behavior could be a result of norms, roles, language, leadership, rules, habits, jobs, perceptions, family engagement, as well as other behaviors demonstrated by individuals and the community.Research limitations/implicationsThis study is not analyzing the role of the social organization or a religious one and also the economic aspect in the evacuation decision-making.Practical implicationsThis paper includes implications for the local government and the BPBD Ponorogo to establish an efficient communication strategy persuading villagers to evacuate. In general, formal policies cannot always be implemented in managing disaster; therefore, visible dedication and solidarity of the members are always needed in order to manage evacuation problems.Originality/valueThis paper meets needs for a study delineating sociocultural factors affecting evacuation decisions before disasters strike. Sociocultural theory could also describe real aspects of culture inherent in the daily lives of populations living in disaster-prone areas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么疏散如此困难?印度尼西亚Ponorogo滑坡灾害的社会文化方面
在灾害疏散研究中,居住在易受灾地区的人口的社会文化方面往往没有得到讨论。因此,本文的主要目的是描述影响疏散决策的社会文化因素。设计/方法/方法这是一项探索性研究,采用深度半结构化访谈来收集数据。举报人的选择也是根据具体标准通过有目的的抽样方法完成的。告密者包括20名遭受灾害的村民和印度尼西亚共和国区域灾害管理委员会的8名工作人员,该委员会是位于波诺罗戈的Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah (BPBD),负责管理灾害。数据分析最终通过主题编码进行。编码分析的结果显示,社会文化因素是灾难发生前做出疏散决定的主要原因之一。在本文中,塑造疏散决策行为的社会文化因素可能是规范、角色、语言、领导、规则、习惯、工作、观念、家庭参与以及个人和社区表现出的其他行为的结果。本研究没有分析社会组织或宗教组织在疏散决策中的作用,也没有分析经济方面的作用。本文对当地政府和BPBD Ponorogo建立有效的沟通策略说服村民撤离的启示。一般来说,在管理灾害时,正式的政策并不总能得到执行;因此,为了管理疏散问题,总是需要成员们明显的奉献和团结。原创性/价值这篇论文满足了研究灾害发生前影响疏散决策的社会文化因素的需要。社会文化理论也可以描述生活在灾害易发地区的人们日常生活中固有的文化的真实方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Disaster Prevention and Management, An International Journal, sets out to advance the available knowledge in the fields of disaster prevention and management and to act as an integrative agent for extant methodologies and activities relating to disaster emergency and crisis management. Publishing high quality, refereed papers, the journal supports the exchange of ideas, experience and practice between academics, practitioners and policy-makers.
期刊最新文献
Creative research with indigenous women: challenging marginalisation through collective spaces and livelihoods practices Punishment and survival – incarcerated persons' experiences with extreme heat in Texas prisons Facilitating the voices of people with disabilities in disaster research: a case study of participatory timeline methodologies in Sindhupalchok Nepal Reflexivity and interdisciplinarity: the reflexive journey of an interdisciplinary research team in disaster risk reduction Comparative study for underlying concepts of land acquisition during post-disaster recovery in Italy, the United States and Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1