Ancient Athenian Democracy, Workers’ Councils, and Leftist Criticism of Stalinist Russia

Q2 Arts and Humanities Clotho Pub Date : 2022-12-23 DOI:10.4312/clotho.4.2.47-67
Vittorio Saldutti
{"title":"Ancient Athenian Democracy, Workers’ Councils, and Leftist Criticism of Stalinist Russia","authors":"Vittorio Saldutti","doi":"10.4312/clotho.4.2.47-67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“The political form at last discovered under which to work out the economic emancipation of labor.” With these words, Marx described the Paris Commune of 1871. It “was formed of the municipal councillors, chosen by universal suffrage in the various wards of the town, responsible and revocable at short term […] a working, not a parliamentary body, executive and legislative at the same time.” The political tradition of the Commune was inherited by the Russian soviets and inspired Lenin, who explained the role of those governing bodies as a “reversion to primitive democracy.” Arthur Rosenberg, professor of Ancient History at Berlin University, tried in his book Democracy and Class Struggle in the Ancient World to offer historical ground for the ideas developed by Lenin in State and Revolution and compared ancient Athenian democracy to the contemporary German and Russian councils. During the 1920s, as a communist leader and MP, Rosenberg, recalling his ideas on Athenian democracy, criticized the political degeneration of the Russian workers’ State. He stressed how Soviet Russia, in limiting the power of the councils, had suppressed the governing body of socialist direct democracy. In his work Workers’ Councils, Dutch revolutionary Anton Pannekoek renewed Rosenberg’s criticism at the end of World War II, returning to the image of ancient democratic Athens as a forerunner of the socialist councils.","PeriodicalId":33790,"journal":{"name":"Clotho","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clotho","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4312/clotho.4.2.47-67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“The political form at last discovered under which to work out the economic emancipation of labor.” With these words, Marx described the Paris Commune of 1871. It “was formed of the municipal councillors, chosen by universal suffrage in the various wards of the town, responsible and revocable at short term […] a working, not a parliamentary body, executive and legislative at the same time.” The political tradition of the Commune was inherited by the Russian soviets and inspired Lenin, who explained the role of those governing bodies as a “reversion to primitive democracy.” Arthur Rosenberg, professor of Ancient History at Berlin University, tried in his book Democracy and Class Struggle in the Ancient World to offer historical ground for the ideas developed by Lenin in State and Revolution and compared ancient Athenian democracy to the contemporary German and Russian councils. During the 1920s, as a communist leader and MP, Rosenberg, recalling his ideas on Athenian democracy, criticized the political degeneration of the Russian workers’ State. He stressed how Soviet Russia, in limiting the power of the councils, had suppressed the governing body of socialist direct democracy. In his work Workers’ Councils, Dutch revolutionary Anton Pannekoek renewed Rosenberg’s criticism at the end of World War II, returning to the image of ancient democratic Athens as a forerunner of the socialist councils.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
古雅典民主、工人委员会与左派对斯大林主义俄国的批评
“终于发现了实现劳动经济解放的政治形式。”马克思用这些话描述了1871年的巴黎公社。它“由市议员组成,由各区普选产生,负责任且可在短期内罢免……这是一个工作机构,而非议会机构,同时是行政和立法机构。”俄罗斯苏维埃继承了公社的政治传统,并启发了列宁,他将这些管理机构的作用解释为“向原始民主的回归”。柏林大学古代史教授阿瑟·罗森伯格在《古代世界的民主与阶级斗争》一书中试图为列宁在《国家与革命》中提出的思想提供历史依据,并将古代雅典的民主与当代德国和俄罗斯的议会进行了比较。在20世纪20年代,作为共产主义领导人和国会议员,罗森博格回忆起他对雅典民主的看法,批评了俄国工人国家的政治堕落。他强调苏俄如何在限制议会权力的同时,压制了社会主义直接民主的管理机构。在他的著作《工人委员会》中,荷兰革命家Anton Pannekoek在第二次世界大战结束时重申了罗森伯格的批评,将古代民主雅典的形象作为社会主义委员会的先驱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Medea Rejuvenates Herself: Female Roles and the Use of the Body in Seneca’s Medea Motiv svobode, človekovega dostojanstva in zavedanja skupne človeške usode od antike do Cervantesa Julian the Apostate, Claudius Mamertinus, and Ammianus Marcellinus: Filling in a “Blank Spot”? Pliny the Elder and Nicholas of Poland on Snake Products and Their Medical Applications Neil Gaiman’s Use of Antiquity in Television Series: American Gods and Calliope
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1