Temporal variability in organic amendment impacts on hydro-physical properties of sandy agricultural soils

Dirk-Jan Daniel Kok, Laura Scherer, Wim de Vries, Peter Michiel van Bodegom
{"title":"Temporal variability in organic amendment impacts on hydro-physical properties of sandy agricultural soils","authors":"Dirk-Jan Daniel Kok,&nbsp;Laura Scherer,&nbsp;Wim de Vries,&nbsp;Peter Michiel van Bodegom","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Organic amendments (OAs) can improve the hydro-physical properties of a soil and thereby potentially enhance the resilience of agricultural systems to droughts and floods. An OA's contribution to this resilience, however, depends on the timeliness of its impacts, as soil improvements should be achieved when droughts are most frequent or flood risks are greatest. Yet little is known regarding the temporal variability of OA impacts or the influence of OA quantity and quality thereupon. In this research, therefore, we investigated at two agricultural sites the temporal variability of improvements in soil bulk density, aggregate stability, infiltration capacity and water retention after the application of compost, farmyard manure, bokashi, a selection of organic residues from landscape maintenance, and a combination of these residues with manure. Results showed that, depending on management practices and soil type, OAs decrease bulk density by up to 9.8%, increase infiltration capacity by up to 108.1%, aggregate stability by up to 60.0%, and water retention by up to 77.8% relative to unamended controls within 3 years of repeated application. However, the magnitude of these improvements varies up to 96% between seasons, depending on the soil property and OA treatment. On average, for all treatments, impacts relative to the control varied between different seasons by 5% for bulk density, 47.1% for infiltration capacity, 22.6% for aggregate stability, and 26.3% for water retention. When offsetting OA nutrient differences with mineral fertilizers, this variability showed a stronger correlation to differences in OA application quantity than quality (i.e., chemical composition). Results suggest that disregarding temporal variability in OA impacts can result in an inaccurate valuation of OAs as either effective or ineffective in improving soil resilience, given that impacts may, instead of their frequently presumed persistency, actually be highly transient or lagged. Our findings highlight the importance of considering the potential intra-annual variability of OA impacts on soil hydro-physical properties when designing OA application strategies to ameliorate the effects of specific seasonal climatic challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"87 4","pages":"963-984"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.20547","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Organic amendments (OAs) can improve the hydro-physical properties of a soil and thereby potentially enhance the resilience of agricultural systems to droughts and floods. An OA's contribution to this resilience, however, depends on the timeliness of its impacts, as soil improvements should be achieved when droughts are most frequent or flood risks are greatest. Yet little is known regarding the temporal variability of OA impacts or the influence of OA quantity and quality thereupon. In this research, therefore, we investigated at two agricultural sites the temporal variability of improvements in soil bulk density, aggregate stability, infiltration capacity and water retention after the application of compost, farmyard manure, bokashi, a selection of organic residues from landscape maintenance, and a combination of these residues with manure. Results showed that, depending on management practices and soil type, OAs decrease bulk density by up to 9.8%, increase infiltration capacity by up to 108.1%, aggregate stability by up to 60.0%, and water retention by up to 77.8% relative to unamended controls within 3 years of repeated application. However, the magnitude of these improvements varies up to 96% between seasons, depending on the soil property and OA treatment. On average, for all treatments, impacts relative to the control varied between different seasons by 5% for bulk density, 47.1% for infiltration capacity, 22.6% for aggregate stability, and 26.3% for water retention. When offsetting OA nutrient differences with mineral fertilizers, this variability showed a stronger correlation to differences in OA application quantity than quality (i.e., chemical composition). Results suggest that disregarding temporal variability in OA impacts can result in an inaccurate valuation of OAs as either effective or ineffective in improving soil resilience, given that impacts may, instead of their frequently presumed persistency, actually be highly transient or lagged. Our findings highlight the importance of considering the potential intra-annual variability of OA impacts on soil hydro-physical properties when designing OA application strategies to ameliorate the effects of specific seasonal climatic challenges.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有机改良剂对沙质农业土壤水物理性质影响的时间变异性
有机改良剂(OAs)可以改善土壤的水物理特性,从而有可能增强农业系统对干旱和洪水的抵御能力。然而,OA对这种恢复力的贡献取决于其影响的及时性,因为应该在干旱最频繁或洪水风险最大的时候实现土壤改善。然而,关于OA影响的时间变异性,以及OA数量和质量对其的影响,我们所知甚少。因此,在本研究中,我们在两个农业基地调查了施用堆肥、农家肥、bokashi、景观维护中选择的有机残留物以及这些残留物与粪便的组合后,土壤容重、团聚体稳定性、入渗能力和保水能力改善的时间变异。结果表明,根据不同的管理方法和土壤类型,在3年的重复施用中,相对于未经修改的对照,OAs降低了高达9.8%的容重,增加了高达108.1%的入渗能力,提高了高达60.0%的团聚体稳定性,以及高达77.8%的保水性。然而,这些改善的幅度在不同季节之间变化高达96%,这取决于土壤性质和OA处理。平均而言,所有处理相对于对照的影响在不同季节之间变化幅度分别为容重5%、入渗能力47.1%、团聚体稳定性22.6%和保水能力26.3%。当用矿质肥料抵消OA养分差异时,这种变异与OA施用量差异的相关性强于与质量(即化学成分)差异的相关性。结果表明,忽视OA影响的时间变异性可能导致对OA在改善土壤恢复力方面有效或无效的评估不准确,因为影响可能是高度短暂或滞后的,而不是通常假定的持久性。我们的研究结果强调了在设计OA应用策略以改善特定季节气候挑战的影响时,考虑OA对土壤水物理性质影响的潜在年内变异性的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of long-term nighttime warming on carbon storage and nitrogen retention of calcareous soil profiles in wheatland Microtopography controls organic and inorganic carbon stocks in Vertisols: Insights from a climosequence on the Texas coastal plain Impact of soil core preparation on hydraulic properties and modeled carbon cycling across texture classes Cover crop can offset negative effects of corn silage harvest on soils in a corn silage–soybean rotation Numerical analysis of slope stability in granite residual soil under rainfall conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1