The Safety of Treatment with Cefepime in Elderly Patients

IF 1 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Aging Medicine and Healthcare Pub Date : 2019-12-23 DOI:10.33879/amh.2019.125-1805.010
Joyce M. Cabradilla, P. Ong, E. Villaverde, Eloisa Marasigan, Nathalie Declarador, K. Tan, H. N. Tan, Y. Ding
{"title":"The Safety of Treatment with Cefepime in Elderly Patients","authors":"Joyce M. Cabradilla, P. Ong, E. Villaverde, Eloisa Marasigan, Nathalie Declarador, K. Tan, H. N. Tan, Y. Ding","doi":"10.33879/amh.2019.125-1805.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/Purpose: Cefepime-induced neurotoxicity has been reported worldwide sporadically. Most patients affected are elderly and have renal impairment. Few cases were identified in our institution and prompted this review to formulate measures to prevent its occurrence. Methods: This is a quality improvement study done in the Department of Geriatric Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore. We retrieved case records of patients who received cefepime between March 2014 and September 2015. Demographic data, comorbidities, indication, duration and doses of cefepime were recorded. Case records of patients which developed neurologic symptoms were independently reviewed. Patients were determined to have cefepime-induced neurotoxicity based on set criteria. Results: Total of 279 records were reviewed. Cefepime was administered for a mean duration of 3.2 days. Urinary tract infection was the most common indication for prescribing cefepime. Majority of patients were cognitively impaired (n=174, 62%) and had chronic kidney disease (CKD) (n=157, 56%). Six cases (2.2%) were identified to have cefepime-induced neurotoxicity. The mean daily dose of cefepime administered for this group was lower compared to the rest of the cohort, but the duration of treatment was longer. Mean latency period was 3 days and mean recovery period was 4 days. Predominant symptoms were confusion (n=6) and drowsiness (n=5). Other symptoms were myoclonus (n=2) and agitation (n=2). Eighteen patients received higher dose of cefepime based on creatinine clearance, but none of them developed neurologic symptoms. Conclusion: Since this special group is vulnerable, there should be increased awareness for this condition, diligent adjustment of cefepime dosages according to renal function and timely de-escalation of antibiotics.","PeriodicalId":36784,"journal":{"name":"Aging Medicine and Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Medicine and Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33879/amh.2019.125-1805.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background/Purpose: Cefepime-induced neurotoxicity has been reported worldwide sporadically. Most patients affected are elderly and have renal impairment. Few cases were identified in our institution and prompted this review to formulate measures to prevent its occurrence. Methods: This is a quality improvement study done in the Department of Geriatric Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore. We retrieved case records of patients who received cefepime between March 2014 and September 2015. Demographic data, comorbidities, indication, duration and doses of cefepime were recorded. Case records of patients which developed neurologic symptoms were independently reviewed. Patients were determined to have cefepime-induced neurotoxicity based on set criteria. Results: Total of 279 records were reviewed. Cefepime was administered for a mean duration of 3.2 days. Urinary tract infection was the most common indication for prescribing cefepime. Majority of patients were cognitively impaired (n=174, 62%) and had chronic kidney disease (CKD) (n=157, 56%). Six cases (2.2%) were identified to have cefepime-induced neurotoxicity. The mean daily dose of cefepime administered for this group was lower compared to the rest of the cohort, but the duration of treatment was longer. Mean latency period was 3 days and mean recovery period was 4 days. Predominant symptoms were confusion (n=6) and drowsiness (n=5). Other symptoms were myoclonus (n=2) and agitation (n=2). Eighteen patients received higher dose of cefepime based on creatinine clearance, but none of them developed neurologic symptoms. Conclusion: Since this special group is vulnerable, there should be increased awareness for this condition, diligent adjustment of cefepime dosages according to renal function and timely de-escalation of antibiotics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
头孢吡肟治疗老年患者的安全性
背景/目的:头孢吡肟引起的神经毒性在世界范围内零星报道。大多数受影响的患者是老年人,有肾功能损害。在我们的机构中发现的病例很少,这促使这次审查制定了防止其发生的措施。方法:这是一项在新加坡Tan Tock Seng医院老年医学部进行的质量改进研究。我们检索了2014年3月至2015年9月期间接受头孢吡肟治疗的患者的病例记录。记录人口统计学数据、合并症、适应症、持续时间和头孢吡肟的剂量。对出现神经系统症状的患者的病例记录进行独立审查。根据设定的标准,确定患者具有头孢吡肟诱导的神经毒性。结果:共审查了279份记录。头孢吡肟给药的平均持续时间为3.2天。尿路感染是开头孢吡肟最常见的适应症。大多数患者认知受损(n=174,62%),患有慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)(n=157,56%)。6例(2.2%)被鉴定为具有头孢吡肟诱导的神经毒性。与其他队列相比,该组患者的头孢吡肟平均日剂量较低,但治疗持续时间较长。平均潜伏期为3天,平均恢复期为4天。主要症状为意识模糊(n=6)和嗜睡(n=5)。其他症状为肌阵挛(n=2)和烦躁不安(n=2)。根据肌酸酐清除率,18名患者接受了更高剂量的头孢吡肟治疗,但没有一名患者出现神经系统症状。结论:由于这一特殊人群易感,应提高对这种情况的认识,根据肾功能适时调整头孢吡肟的剂量,并及时停用抗生素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aging Medicine and Healthcare
Aging Medicine and Healthcare Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Decoding the Cerebellum’s Contribution to Aging and Cognitive Declines The Association Between Health Literacy and Quality of Life in the Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study Accuracy and Applicability of the SARC-F and SARC-CalF Questionnaire in the Screening of Sarcopenia in Hospitalized Elderly Patients How Rational is the Use of Medicine in Elderly Individuals?: The Turkey Example Happiness and Its Determinants among Community-Dwelling Middle-Aged and Older Adults: Age- and Sex-Specific Analysis in the Gan-Dau Healthy Longevity Plan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1