Systematic review and meta-analysis of intravenous and topical tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss in knee arthroplasty

Q3 Health Professions Disaster and Emergency Medicine Journal Pub Date : 2022-09-30 DOI:10.5603/demj.a2022.0025
Jarosław Pecold, Mahdi Al-Jeabory, M. Matuszewski, M. Pruc, A. Maslyukov, Maciej Krupowies, Ewa Mańka, J. Smereka, L. Szarpak
{"title":"Systematic review and meta-analysis of intravenous and topical tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss in knee arthroplasty","authors":"Jarosław Pecold, Mahdi Al-Jeabory, M. Matuszewski, M. Pruc, A. Maslyukov, Maciej Krupowies, Ewa Mańka, J. Smereka, L. Szarpak","doi":"10.5603/demj.a2022.0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"InTrodUcTIon: The purpose of this review and meta-analysis is to compare tranexamic acid (TXA) administration via the intravenous route (IV-TXA) and topical route (T-TXA), in reducing blood loss in knee arthroplasty. MATerIAL And MeTHods: A systematic literature search was performed using Medline, EMBASE, Scopus and CENTRAL databases till December 20, 2021. Outcomes of interest included blood loss, hematocrit and hemoglobin drop, and adverse events. resULTs: A total of 3,363 patients (n = 1,307 in IV-TXA group; n = 2,056 in T-TXA group) from 23 studies were included. There was no statistically significantly difference between IV-TXA and T-TXA among to: total blood loss (874.8 ± 349.7 mL vs 844.9 ± 366.6 mL, respectively; SMD = 0.13; 95% CI: −9.37 to 85.32; p = 0.15), as well as transfusion needed (10.9% vs 15.4% respectively (RR = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.60 to 1.04; p = 0.09). Blood loss from the drain in IV-TXA and T-TXA varied and occurred 377.9 ± 191.9 vs 302.9 ± 182.6 mL for IV-TXA and T-TXA, respectively: (SMD = 0.52; 95% CI: 0.02 to 1.02; p = 0.04). concLUsIons: Our clinical findings support that TXA can effectively, safely, and decrease the number of transfusions without severe side effects in patients undergoing TKA. However, given the reports from individual single clinical trials of the superiority of T-TXA, further clinical trials and meta-analyses based on these findings are needed to standardize the approach to TXA use in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty.","PeriodicalId":52339,"journal":{"name":"Disaster and Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disaster and Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/demj.a2022.0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

InTrodUcTIon: The purpose of this review and meta-analysis is to compare tranexamic acid (TXA) administration via the intravenous route (IV-TXA) and topical route (T-TXA), in reducing blood loss in knee arthroplasty. MATerIAL And MeTHods: A systematic literature search was performed using Medline, EMBASE, Scopus and CENTRAL databases till December 20, 2021. Outcomes of interest included blood loss, hematocrit and hemoglobin drop, and adverse events. resULTs: A total of 3,363 patients (n = 1,307 in IV-TXA group; n = 2,056 in T-TXA group) from 23 studies were included. There was no statistically significantly difference between IV-TXA and T-TXA among to: total blood loss (874.8 ± 349.7 mL vs 844.9 ± 366.6 mL, respectively; SMD = 0.13; 95% CI: −9.37 to 85.32; p = 0.15), as well as transfusion needed (10.9% vs 15.4% respectively (RR = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.60 to 1.04; p = 0.09). Blood loss from the drain in IV-TXA and T-TXA varied and occurred 377.9 ± 191.9 vs 302.9 ± 182.6 mL for IV-TXA and T-TXA, respectively: (SMD = 0.52; 95% CI: 0.02 to 1.02; p = 0.04). concLUsIons: Our clinical findings support that TXA can effectively, safely, and decrease the number of transfusions without severe side effects in patients undergoing TKA. However, given the reports from individual single clinical trials of the superiority of T-TXA, further clinical trials and meta-analyses based on these findings are needed to standardize the approach to TXA use in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
静脉注射和外用氨甲环酸减少膝关节置换术出血量的系统评价和荟萃分析
简介:本综述和荟萃分析的目的是比较氨甲环酸(TXA)通过静脉途径(IV-TXA)和外用途径(T-TXA)在减少膝关节置换术中失血量方面的效果。材料和方法:使用Medline、EMBASE、Scopus和CENTRAL数据库进行系统文献检索,检索截止日期为2021年12月20日。研究结果包括失血、红细胞压积和血红蛋白下降以及不良事件。结果:IV-TXA组共3363例患者(n = 1307);n = 2056 (T-TXA组),共纳入23项研究。IV-TXA与T-TXA在总失血量(874.8±349.7 mL vs 844.9±366.6 mL)之间无统计学差异;SMD = 0.13;95% CI:−9.37 ~ 85.32;p = 0.15),以及输血需求(10.9% vs 15.4%) (RR = 0.79;95% CI: 0.60 ~ 1.04;P = 0.09)。IV-TXA和T-TXA的引流失血量各不相同,分别为377.9±191.9 mL和302.9±182.6 mL (SMD = 0.52;95% CI: 0.02 ~ 1.02;P = 0.04)。结论:我们的临床研究结果支持TXA可以有效、安全地减少TKA患者的输血次数,并且没有严重的副作用。然而,鉴于单个临床试验对T-TXA优越性的报道,需要基于这些发现的进一步临床试验和荟萃分析来规范膝关节置换术患者使用TXA的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Disaster and Emergency Medicine Journal
Disaster and Emergency Medicine Journal Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Navigating mortality prediction in severe malaria: risk stratification models from the emergency department of coastal India Evaluating the risk: Group A Streptococcus as a causative agent of streptococcal toxic shock syndrome and necrotizing fasciitis Reassessment of the underlying mechanisms that contribute to the neurological disorders linked to long-term COVID-19 Use of tourniquets for hemorrhage control in civilian and military prehospital settings: metabolic, hemodynamic, and anatomical complications derived from exposure time Ethical predictability of human resources in Iranian hospitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1