Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the Iranian caregiver burden questionnaire for heart failure

IF 0.2 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Research in Cardiovascular Medicine Pub Date : 2020-04-01 DOI:10.4103/rcm.rcm_13_20
Marjohn Hamediseresht, Yasaman Khalili, Raana Asghari, S. Taghavi, A. Amin, N. Naderi
{"title":"Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the Iranian caregiver burden questionnaire for heart failure","authors":"Marjohn Hamediseresht, Yasaman Khalili, Raana Asghari, S. Taghavi, A. Amin, N. Naderi","doi":"10.4103/rcm.rcm_13_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: It is important to have a strong appropriate tool for measuring, evaluating, and understanding the nature and consequences of chronic stresses on caregivers of patients with heart failure (HF). The purpose of this study is the assessment of the validity and reliability of the questionnaire for evaluating the burden on caregivers of patients with HF. Methods: In order to assess the burden of caregivers of patients with HF, the Caregiver Burden Questionnaire for Heart Failure version 3 (CBQ-HF, version 3) was used. After translation and back translation, the questionnaire was provided to 20 caregivers, and after 2 weeks, the same caregivers refilled the questionnaire; so that, we could measure its reliability by calculating Cronbach's alpha. Face validity and content validity were also obtained at this stage. Finally, the questionnaire was provided to eighty caregivers; hence, the total number of one hundred caregivers completed the questionnaire. Results: From a total of 100 collected questionnaires, 68 of participants were male and 32 of participants were female. The mean ± standard deviation of emotional burden on the patient's caregivers was 46 ± 10 and the median of the physical, social, and living pattern burden was 14, 4, and 13, respectively. The test–retest reliability showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: 94%). Conclusion: This study approved the Persian version of CBQHF questionnaire as a standard and valid tool in Persian language, which can be used among caregivers of patients with HF in order to examine their problems and to plan for improving their quality of life.","PeriodicalId":21031,"journal":{"name":"Research in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/rcm.rcm_13_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: It is important to have a strong appropriate tool for measuring, evaluating, and understanding the nature and consequences of chronic stresses on caregivers of patients with heart failure (HF). The purpose of this study is the assessment of the validity and reliability of the questionnaire for evaluating the burden on caregivers of patients with HF. Methods: In order to assess the burden of caregivers of patients with HF, the Caregiver Burden Questionnaire for Heart Failure version 3 (CBQ-HF, version 3) was used. After translation and back translation, the questionnaire was provided to 20 caregivers, and after 2 weeks, the same caregivers refilled the questionnaire; so that, we could measure its reliability by calculating Cronbach's alpha. Face validity and content validity were also obtained at this stage. Finally, the questionnaire was provided to eighty caregivers; hence, the total number of one hundred caregivers completed the questionnaire. Results: From a total of 100 collected questionnaires, 68 of participants were male and 32 of participants were female. The mean ± standard deviation of emotional burden on the patient's caregivers was 46 ± 10 and the median of the physical, social, and living pattern burden was 14, 4, and 13, respectively. The test–retest reliability showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: 94%). Conclusion: This study approved the Persian version of CBQHF questionnaire as a standard and valid tool in Persian language, which can be used among caregivers of patients with HF in order to examine their problems and to plan for improving their quality of life.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊朗照护者心力衰竭负担问卷的信度和效度评估
引言:重要的是要有一个强大的适当工具来测量、评估和理解慢性压力对心力衰竭患者护理人员的性质和后果。本研究的目的是评估评估HF患者护理人员负担的问卷的有效性和可靠性。方法:为了评估HF患者的护理人员负担,使用心力衰竭护理人员负担问卷第3版(CBQ-HF,第3版)。翻译和回译后,将问卷提供给20名护理人员,2周后,相同的护理人员重新填写问卷;因此,我们可以通过计算Cronbachα来衡量它的可靠性。这一阶段还获得了面孔有效性和内容有效性。最后,向80名护理人员提供了调查表;因此,共有100名护理人员完成了问卷调查。结果:在总共收集的100份问卷中,68名参与者是男性,32名参与者是女性。患者照顾者的情绪负担的平均值±标准差为46±10,身体、社会和生活模式负担的中位数分别为14、4和13。测试-再测试的可靠性显示出高度的内部一致性(Cronbachα:94%)。结论:本研究认可CBQHF问卷的波斯语版本是一种标准有效的波斯语工具,可在HF患者的护理人员中使用,以检查他们的问题并计划改善他们的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Cardiovascular Medicine
Research in Cardiovascular Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
An unusual presentation of a rare case of rhabdomyosarcoma of the left atrium as severe rheumatic mitral stenosis with atrial fibrillation, fast ventricular rate, and left atrial failure Prognostic value of cardiac and noncardiac biomarkers in infective endocarditis: A prospective cross-sectional study Transcatheter closure of the aortopulmonary window with a multifunctional occluder device Predictions of adherence to treatment in patients referred to the heart failure clinic of Shahid Rajaee Hospital in Tehran The association between statin dosage and malignant ventricular arrhythmias in patients with primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for ischemic cardiomyopathy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1