Religious Populism in Mainstream Media between Indonesia and India

IF 0.3 Q4 COMMUNICATION Jurnal The Messenger Pub Date : 2022-05-03 DOI:10.26623/themessenger.v14i1.4193
Usman Kansong, I. Sunarwinadi, Pinckey Triputra
{"title":"Religious Populism in Mainstream Media between Indonesia and India","authors":"Usman Kansong, I. Sunarwinadi, Pinckey Triputra","doi":"10.26623/themessenger.v14i1.4193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p class=\"Default\"><strong><span>Introduction: </span></strong><span>The mainstream media used political and media logic on religious populism to reinforce ideological changes in contemporary society. This study investigated how media mediatize the 212 rally (<em>aksi 212</em>) and the 2017 Jakarta Governorial Election as religious populism cases. This study also compared how media in Indonesia and India delivered the content based on the majority identity.</span></p><p class=\"Default\"><strong>Methods:</strong> This study applied a qualitative approach. Detik.com, Metro TV, and Republika Daily were selected based on their delivery content platform and media ownership. The qualitative content analysis was applied to explore the concepts of political and media logic. Then, the results of Islamic populism in Indonesia were compared with Hindu populism in India.</p><p class=\"Default\"><strong>Findings: </strong>This study found that the three media mediatized <em>aksi 212</em> and the 2017 Jakarta Governorial Election as religious populism by using direct interaction. Detik.com was applying media logic while Metro TV and Republika Daily performed political logic. In comparing religious populism between Indonesia and India, the finding confirmed that populism came from a major identity. The finding showed that economic motivation could be escalated in parallel with religious identity.  </p><strong><span>Originality: </span></strong><span>This study become a novelty since no previous studies investigate the different delivery content platforms and the media ownership including comparing the mediatization process between two countries. Previous studies focused on the media concentration based on media ownership, platform, media landscape, and media policy without a mediatization process and religious populism. The previous studies of the mediatization of religious populism were conducted in a single case.</span>","PeriodicalId":41738,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal The Messenger","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal The Messenger","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26623/themessenger.v14i1.4193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: The mainstream media used political and media logic on religious populism to reinforce ideological changes in contemporary society. This study investigated how media mediatize the 212 rally (aksi 212) and the 2017 Jakarta Governorial Election as religious populism cases. This study also compared how media in Indonesia and India delivered the content based on the majority identity.

Methods: This study applied a qualitative approach. Detik.com, Metro TV, and Republika Daily were selected based on their delivery content platform and media ownership. The qualitative content analysis was applied to explore the concepts of political and media logic. Then, the results of Islamic populism in Indonesia were compared with Hindu populism in India.

Findings: This study found that the three media mediatized aksi 212 and the 2017 Jakarta Governorial Election as religious populism by using direct interaction. Detik.com was applying media logic while Metro TV and Republika Daily performed political logic. In comparing religious populism between Indonesia and India, the finding confirmed that populism came from a major identity. The finding showed that economic motivation could be escalated in parallel with religious identity.  

Originality: This study become a novelty since no previous studies investigate the different delivery content platforms and the media ownership including comparing the mediatization process between two countries. Previous studies focused on the media concentration based on media ownership, platform, media landscape, and media policy without a mediatization process and religious populism. The previous studies of the mediatization of religious populism were conducted in a single case.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印尼与印度主流媒体中的宗教民粹主义
引言:主流媒体运用宗教民粹主义的政治和媒体逻辑,强化了当代社会的意识形态变化。本研究调查媒体如何将212集会(aksi 212)和2017年雅加达省长选举作为宗教民粹主义案例进行媒介化。这项研究还比较了印尼和印度的媒体是如何根据大多数人的身份来传递内容的。方法:本研究采用定性方法。Detik.com、Metro TV和Republika Daily是根据它们的传播内容平台和媒体所有权入选的。定性的内容分析应用于探讨政治和媒体逻辑的概念。然后,将印度尼西亚伊斯兰民粹主义的结果与印度印度教民粹主义的结果进行比较。结果:本研究发现,三家媒体通过直接互动将aksi 212和2017年雅加达省长选举作为宗教民粹主义进行中介。Detik.com运用的是媒体逻辑,而Metro TV和Republika Daily运用的是政治逻辑。通过比较印尼和印度的宗教民粹主义,研究结果证实,民粹主义来自一个主要的身份。这一发现表明,经济动机可以与宗教认同同时升级。原创性:本研究是一项新颖的研究,因为之前没有研究调查不同的传播内容平台和媒体所有权,包括比较两国的媒介化过程。以往的研究关注的是基于媒体所有权、平台、媒体格局和媒体政策的媒体集中度,而非媒介化过程和宗教民粹主义。以往对宗教民粹主义媒介化的研究都是在单一案例中进行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Jurnal The Messenger
Jurnal The Messenger COMMUNICATION-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
Social Media Managers’ and Journalists’ Role in Maintaining Local Wisdom in A Mediatized Rural Area The Impact of Social Media Strategies of Non-Profit Organizations on Covid-19 Donation Intention in Indonesia The Creation of Dynamic Visual Objects as a Factor for Optimizing Advertisements in E-Commerce Visualization on Twitter Activism Networks and Opinion Leaders: The Case of #FreeWestPapua Perpetuation of Stigmatization of Minority Groups through Convergence of Content on Streaming and Social Media
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1