Mapping functional tree regions of the Atlantic Forest: how much is left and opportunities for conservation

IF 2.2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Environmental Conservation Pub Date : 2022-05-27 DOI:10.1017/S0376892922000212
J. L. A. Silva, A. F. Souza, A. P. Vitória
{"title":"Mapping functional tree regions of the Atlantic Forest: how much is left and opportunities for conservation","authors":"J. L. A. Silva, A. F. Souza, A. P. Vitória","doi":"10.1017/S0376892922000212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Many biomes still lack an overall view of their macro-functional structure (i.e., natural biogeographical regions and zones), including the Atlantic Forest biodiversity hotspot. The effective design of protected areas depends on the spatial identification of units with ecologically distinct content, whether it be floristic, phylogenetic or functional. This study used a regionalization approach to identify the potential functional regions of the Atlantic Forest by interpolating functional data from forest remnants into the entire original occurrence area of the biome, including deforested lands. Conservation status was then estimated. Analysis of seven traits of leaf, wood, seed and plant size revealed that the biome is structured over 14 functional regions and three zones (clusters of regions). Functional regions represented specific combinations of traits rather than being characterized by extremely high or low values of a single trait. They retained an average of 29.5% of forest remnants (range: 7.63–54.66%) and 10.82% of protected areas (range: 0.35–35.78%). By analysing the functional space occupied by all regions, captured by two principal component analysis axes using the pixel-level information contained in interpolated trait maps, we showed that large parts of this space were not covered by forest remnants or protected areas and that the most represented regions had serious deficits in protected areas. Although the Serra do Mar mountain range in the south and south-east Atlantic Forest is relevant as a centre of species endemism and richness and has received considerable attention for carrying out ecological studies and creating protection areas, this range does not fully encompass the functional biodiversity of such a rich biome. Our results demonstrate the potential for combining regionalization and conservation approaches to unravel the macro-structures of biomes.","PeriodicalId":50517,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Conservation","volume":"49 1","pages":"164 - 171"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892922000212","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary Many biomes still lack an overall view of their macro-functional structure (i.e., natural biogeographical regions and zones), including the Atlantic Forest biodiversity hotspot. The effective design of protected areas depends on the spatial identification of units with ecologically distinct content, whether it be floristic, phylogenetic or functional. This study used a regionalization approach to identify the potential functional regions of the Atlantic Forest by interpolating functional data from forest remnants into the entire original occurrence area of the biome, including deforested lands. Conservation status was then estimated. Analysis of seven traits of leaf, wood, seed and plant size revealed that the biome is structured over 14 functional regions and three zones (clusters of regions). Functional regions represented specific combinations of traits rather than being characterized by extremely high or low values of a single trait. They retained an average of 29.5% of forest remnants (range: 7.63–54.66%) and 10.82% of protected areas (range: 0.35–35.78%). By analysing the functional space occupied by all regions, captured by two principal component analysis axes using the pixel-level information contained in interpolated trait maps, we showed that large parts of this space were not covered by forest remnants or protected areas and that the most represented regions had serious deficits in protected areas. Although the Serra do Mar mountain range in the south and south-east Atlantic Forest is relevant as a centre of species endemism and richness and has received considerable attention for carrying out ecological studies and creating protection areas, this range does not fully encompass the functional biodiversity of such a rich biome. Our results demonstrate the potential for combining regionalization and conservation approaches to unravel the macro-structures of biomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绘制大西洋森林的功能树区:剩下多少和保护的机会
许多生物群系仍然缺乏对其宏观功能结构(即自然生物地理区域和地带)的整体认识,包括大西洋森林生物多样性热点。保护区的有效设计取决于具有不同生态内容的单元的空间识别,无论是植物区系、系统发育还是功能。本研究采用区域化方法,通过将森林残余物的功能数据插值到整个生物群系原生区(包括毁林地),确定大西洋森林的潜在功能区。然后估计保护状况。对叶、木、种子和植株大小等7个性状的分析表明,该生物群系的结构可分为14个功能区和3个区(区簇)。功能区代表了特定性状的组合,而不是单一性状的极高或极低值。平均保留了29.5%的森林残余物(7.63 ~ 54.66%)和10.82%的保护区(0.35 ~ 35.78%)。利用插值特征图谱中包含的像素级信息,通过对两个主成分分析轴捕获的所有区域所占据的功能空间进行分析,我们发现这些空间的大部分没有被森林遗迹或保护区覆盖,并且最具代表性的区域存在严重的保护区缺陷。虽然南大西洋和东南大西洋森林的Serra do Mar山脉是物种特有和丰富的中心,并因进行生态研究和建立保护区而受到相当大的关注,但这一范围并没有完全包括如此丰富的生物群系的功能生物多样性。我们的研究结果表明,结合区划和保护方法来揭示生物群系的宏观结构的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Conservation
Environmental Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Environmental Conservation is one of the longest-standing, most highly-cited of the interdisciplinary environmental science journals. It includes research papers, reports, comments, subject reviews, and book reviews addressing environmental policy, practice, and natural and social science of environmental concern at the global level, informed by rigorous local level case studies. The journal"s scope is very broad, including issues in human institutions, ecosystem change, resource utilisation, terrestrial biomes, aquatic systems, and coastal and land use management. Environmental Conservation is essential reading for all environmentalists, managers, consultants, agency workers and scientists wishing to keep abreast of current developments in environmental science.
期刊最新文献
Economic valuation of changes in ecosystem services of 77 Ramsar wetlands in West Asia over 37 years (1984–2021) The Five-Year Plan and target allocation cycle of environmental pollution in China Impacts of soil and water conservation measures on farm technical efficiency in the semi-arid tropics of central India Recreational agroecosystem service value evidenced by mobile phone data: implications for incentive enhancement in terraced paddy land Trade-offs in fishing strategy decisions and conservation implications for small-scale fisheries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1